Disliked...
Give a Ferrari to a apprentice, he will run in the wall pretty quickly. Give it to Schumacher and see the difference
Ignored
Ralf ramped it TWICE !! Don't tell me Ralf Schmacher is an apprentice !!
Top 100 best Trading Systems: post good Trading Systems here 48 replies
Are the best systems also the systems that fail most spectacularly? 55 replies
Systems, Systems and Systems... 1 reply
So many systems!!! 9 replies
Disliked...
Give a Ferrari to a apprentice, he will run in the wall pretty quickly. Give it to Schumacher and see the difference
Ignored
Disliked"only a fool whoud ignore the economic news."
that might be too radicaly sad. As news they give one perspective to look how it reflects on technical behavour.Ignored
DislikedWhen you talk about technical behavour, it's not really technical, in a TA kind of sense. It's more phycological, which is less scientific. there is a big difference.Ignored
DislikedDon't forget, 10-20 years ago almost nobody used TA. People still lost and made money in very similar ways. TA is new hype idea imho.
Best regards,
VladIgnored
Dislikedi am not sure eanymore what is what. it goes really Dark Areas of horisont when it comes to Randomness and Chaos. people still observing and "starting" to study it.Ignored
DislikedChaos, that's an interesting subject. It seems quite reasonable that a lot of the time, market is "chaotic" in the scientific sense of the word. however, there are clearly times, when market is behaving in much simpler ways. in every market, there are times when it's possible to make abnormal returns, e.g after news events, and this is well documented. Rather then trading chaos, it seems like a better idea to trade inefficiencies and irregularities.Ignored
DislikedIt will not tell what will occure next but it tell the charasteristic similaryties what market contains. Out come of that fragment is never the same. But there is similarityes in behavour.Ignored
Quoting bluebuddahDislikedAs for "magic numbers" (Fibs, Fib retracements, Camarilla levels, Pivot Points, Gann, Murray Math, etc.), I absolutely hate these so-called indicators. They have almost zero basis as to why they should work, and the typical answer I get when I ask someone if it works or not is: "I don't know how it works... it just does"
The one that gets me really upset is Pivot Points... because no one knows why or how they came about... they just blindly follow it because it was the latest, greatest thing a few years ago. Pivot Points come from commodity floor traders;Ignored
Disliked
I did this a couple of years ago and came to the realization that all the indicators are almost the same thing. The reason why TA doesn't work is that instead of understanding what these indicators are and how they work and don't work, everyone spends too much time trying to tweak them to become the perfect indicator. This is as absurd as buying a brand new car, and knowing nothing about auto repair, taking out some random parts, and slapping in new random parts, and expecting to win the next Daytona 500.Ignored
DislikedThat's because all indicators are based off MAs. Look into the metatrader code of each of them and you'll see.Ignored