Trading using Murray Maths and Price Action | Page 55 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Maths question and MT4 compiler/tester issue? 25 replies

Murray maths indicator question 2 replies

Do i need to be a maths genius? 12 replies

How important is a knowledge of maths? 96 replies

Stupid maths 19 replies

Attachments: Trading using Murray Maths and Price Action
Exit Attachments

Trading using Murray Maths and Price Action

  • #1,081
  • Apr 7, 2009 11:54am Apr 7, 2009 11:54am
Hey Karthik can you get me one of those beauties? If you don't mind
  • #1,082
  • Apr 7, 2009 11:55am Apr 7, 2009 11:55am
Quoting Jermy365
Hey Karthik can you get me one of those beauties? If you don't mind

well i would love to have one myself , mate....maybe we could both get one ??..:-))
  • #1,083
  • Apr 7, 2009 11:56am Apr 7, 2009 11:56am
Got out at 147.98 for +37.
  • #1,084
  • Edited 12:06pm Apr 7, 2009 12:02pm | Edited 12:06pm
Quoting malcolmb14
murray math works on gann square principles . It has a frame setting of 8/16/32/64 and 128 .

The MML on higher time frame will look different from lower time frames.

I am new to this but being an engineer am grasping it very quickly and have done many really nice trades on gj both long and short today

I looked at my higher time this morning for a 48 hour target and have 4 standard still off 151.5 and have been scalping in between on a 5 min chart...
Maybe I and others wondering about the mml being at different levels on
different T/F `s is the wrong question . They are not the same levels of
S/R because they can`t be . Its a calculation of price movement taken at
a given amount of time . Am I correct in assuming then that whatever the
mml are at whichever T/F it is still a valid S/R level ? However ns karthik
has found the 60min most reliable . Replys from anyone most welcome .
p.s. ns , your daily pics add the spice , very nice
  • #1,085
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:06pm Apr 7, 2009 12:06pm
Quoting ns_karthik
well i would love to have one myself , mate....maybe we could both get one ??..:-))
you guys! count me in!!!
  • #1,086
  • Edited 12:19pm Apr 7, 2009 12:08pm | Edited 12:19pm
Quoting ns_karthik
well, i take the SR from 1H chart and use it on the 5M charts...
Hi, I've only just started reading the thread and the downloaded books. Here's how I am interpreting what you are saying about H1 and M15 charts. I have manually added the MML to existing S/R lines on the M15. Is that something close to what you do?

Thanks
G

Whhoooops - I used the M15. But I meant to use the M5. Aside from that huge error, have I got the principle right?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: gbpusd.gif Size: 38 KB
  • #1,087
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:20pm Apr 7, 2009 12:20pm
Quoting glass
Maybe I and others wondering about the mml being at different levels on
different T/F `s is the wrong question . They are not the same levels of
S/R because they can`t be . Its a calculation of price movement taken at
a given amount of time . Am I correct in assuming then that whatever the
mml are at whichever T/F it is still a valid S/R level ? However ns karthik
has found the 60min most reliable . Replys from anyone most welcome .
p.s. ns , your daily pics add the spice , very nice
all MM levels in all TFs are valid SR...but those on lower TFs are less strong that the ones on the higher TFs...as simple as that...

the reason that i add pics everyday is cos as traders, we should enjoy what we are doing...already we are quite lonely guys...so for our enjoyment, i post such pics...i hope u all enjoy these and dont consider me as some perverted idiot..
  • #1,088
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:20pm Apr 7, 2009 12:20pm
Quoting Grath
Hi, I've only just started reading the thread and the downloaded books. Here's how I am interpreting what you are saying about H1 and M15 charts. I have manually added the MML to existing S/R lines on the M15. Is that something close to what you do?

Thanks
G

Whhoooops - I used the M15. But I meant to use the M5. Aside from that huge error, have I got the principle right?

yep....but there is an indicator which does this for u....u can find it somewhere on this thread...
  • #1,089
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:24pm Apr 7, 2009 12:24pm
en, have fun

karthik:
again my question on H1,
GAP of E/U 1.3306, U/CHF 1.1414 was not retested...

will it be filled before a further move usually? sorry to be questionaires, haha
I am just wondering what it takes for a solid trend to form...

Quoting ns_karthik
all MM levels in all TFs are valid SR...but those on lower TFs are less strong that the ones on the higher TFs...as simple as that...
  • #1,090
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:26pm Apr 7, 2009 12:26pm
good shorts taken inbetween busy works after pa fail to break 6/8MM in gj , looking for the break 5/8MM or return to 6/8 again for retry .PA almost standstill , not a good sign .waiting ......
fontu
Not understand?better not follow my analyses!doubt clearer first, risks ++
  • #1,091
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:29pm Apr 7, 2009 12:29pm
Quoting billye
en, have fun

karthik:
again my question on H1,
GAP of E/U 1.3306, U/CHF 1.1414 was not retested...

will it be filled before a further move usually? sorry to be questionaires, haha
I am just wondering what it takes for a solid trend to form...

i dont see a gap?? !!
  • #1,092
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:31pm Apr 7, 2009 12:31pm
Quoting ns_karthik
yep....but there is an indicator which does this for u....u can find it somewhere on this thread...
Hmmmm. Yes I saw the previous posts about that and your comment to someone to use their eyes (I think it was) but I went there too and failed to find the link. No matter; I'll download all the rest and find the one you mean.

Interestingly, (or not 'cos you don't use M15), the one I have at the moment, MurreyMath-TimeFrame rev b, paints lines at the same levels on M15 as H1 with some more intermediate lines. Makes sense 'cos one is 4 times the other. It's the M5 for which I need to search for this other indicator.

Thanks for a really useful thread. I hope to be able to learn mml here.

G
  • #1,093
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:35pm Apr 7, 2009 12:35pm
Quoting Grath
Hmmmm....

its there on post #235 mate...
  • #1,094
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:38pm Apr 7, 2009 12:38pm
Quoting Grath
Hmmmm....
Here I will post it one more time, but it is on the thread already. I just went and found it. Took me 43seconds.
Attached File(s)
File Type: mq4 Murrey_Math_Line_X_eng.mq4   13 KB | 660 downloads
  • #1,095
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:40pm Apr 7, 2009 12:40pm
Quoting smjones
Here I will post it one more time, but it is on the thread already. I just went and found it. Took me 43seconds.

hiya mate...how r u doing??
  • #1,096
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:46pm Apr 7, 2009 12:46pm
Quoting ns_karthik
hiya mate...how r u doing??
Been trading LOL I like your method. I only traded the EURUSD this morning and had a great time
Shorted at 1.3360 at 08:25 GMT and another short at 1.3324 at 09:00 GMT

Both were sell stop entries on 1 pip lower than the bar that retested the MML.

Closed both at 1.3245 on the recalculated 1/8. Got re-quoted a couple of times on the way out, but that is the way of trading and to be expected.

It was good fun. Thanks again for such a well laid out approach
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: ScreenHunter_003.gif Size: 14 KB
  • #1,097
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:48pm Apr 7, 2009 12:48pm
oh, I mean do this 2 levels have to be re-tested before going forward?? they are 2 major H1 levels right???
I only see it stall at minor(M15) level... not sure what you usually see coz only look at H1 m-m for 2 days... do they re-test every level before going forward??
1.3489 not retested as well...

http://www.forexfactory.com/attachme...1&d=1239106879
Quoting ns_karthik

Quote:
Originally Posted by billye http://www.forexfactory.com/images/buttons/viewpost.gif
en, have fun

karthik:
again my question on H1,
GAP of E/U 1.3306, U/CHF 1.1414 was not retested...

will it be filled before a further move usually? sorry to be questionaires, haha
I am just wondering what it takes for a solid trend to form...


i dont see a gap?? !!
  • #1,098
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:51pm Apr 7, 2009 12:51pm
Quoting smjones
Been trading LOL I like your method. I only traded the EURUSD this morning and had a great time
Shorted at 1.3360 at 08:25 GMT and another short at 1.3324 at 09:00 GMT

Both were sell stop entries on 1 pip lower than the bar that retested the MML.

Closed both at 1.3245 on the recalculated 1/8

It was good fun. Thanks again for such a well laid out approach

isnt that a previlege for me?? i was just going thru your profile and it was then i realised how well respected u r around here in FF....and to get such comments from such a person is really humbling....thanks Jones..
  • #1,099
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:55pm Apr 7, 2009 12:55pm
Quoting billye
oh, I mean do this 2 levels have to be re-tested before going forward?? they are 2 major H1 levels right???
I only see it stall at minor(M15) level... not sure what you usually see coz only look at H1 m-m for 2 days... do they re-test every level before going forward??
1.3489 not retested as well...

http://www.forexfactory.com/attachme...1&d=1239106879

well i dont look for retests and i dont have any specific system which says that there has to be re test of every level before going forward....as u would have seen...i just trade this moment and the next....not for me, the prediction what it would do 5 hrs or 6 hrs later...i just keep it simple and trade what i see...break of SR, take a trade...stall at SR, take profit or SL and run....thats all...
  • #1,100
  • Apr 7, 2009 12:57pm Apr 7, 2009 12:57pm
agree! levels are good and well calculated center/SR

but how did you decide to travel short for 2 H1 levels? just curious. [edit: karthik says, break out a S/R, that simple?!]

did you use some other analysis for the going short? haha again I'm questionaires... sorry smjones
Quoting smjones
Been trading LOL I like your method. I only traded the EURUSD this morning and had a great time
Shorted at 1.3360 at 08:25 GMT and another short at 1.3324 at 09:00 GMT

Both were sell stop entries on 1 pip lower than the bar that retested the MML.

Closed both at 1.3245 on the recalculated 1/8. Got re-quoted a couple of times on the way out, but that is the way of trading and to be expected.

It was good fun. Thanks again for such a well laid out approach
0 traders viewing now