Please see Phillip's posting on page Page 183 posting 2738. chart of USDJPY.
Here, I am not seeing point B and Point C (in his chart) as double bottoms.
I am seeing them as individual "agressive reversal Trades".
Can you differentiate between the approaches you would have taken on the two Agressive trades at point B and point C?
Point B is same as point C in MACD. Here are my observations for you to comment and correct:
Observation #1:
At agressive trade point B, if we had followed your philosophy of (i) "Determine your SL to about 35 to 40 pips and (ii) place your buy limit order so that this 35 to 40 pip SL is below the low of previous candle by at least 15 to 20 pips", then we would not have entered this long trade at all which is good!
At point C, the same approach would have allowed us to enter the long trade which is again good!
Observation #2:
Both the aggressive long trades at point B and C are counter-trend trades. Then, how do we differentiate between them and favor trade at point C and refuse the same at point B?
At the agressive long trade at point B the price is far away from both the fast MAs (8 and 21). So, for the market to go up, it has to travel horizontally (transverse travel) for a while to reach the fast MAs, and then cross those MAs up and, if at all it does these two uphill tasks, then and then only it can muster the courage to go up. This up hill task for the price [(i) travel transverse to come close to the two fast MAs and (ii) cross them up], these two uphill tasks are the reasons for us to be skeptic (or hesitant) to go long on the aggrsssive trade at B.
Where as at point C, the similar agressive trade is pretty close to two fast MAs. It just has to cross the two MAs which are in the vicinity of the price. THERE IS NO TRANSVESRE TRAVEL (horizontal travel) needed to come close to those two fast MAs. So we can feel comfortable to go long on this trade.
Here, Phillip, the concept of what you said about the MACD signal and the (e)motion of the price action makes great sense. In both cases (pt B and Pt C) there was an MACD signal (agressive trade). There was no difference in these two signals. But the price action, the price (e)motion played its role and made us not to take the signal at pt B and take the signal at point C.
What is your comment? Can we safely hesitate to take an MACD signal (revesring signals only) if the price is pretty far away from the two fast MAs and not to hesitate to take similar signal if the price is pretty close to the fast MAs?
Please read this twice with your UADJPY chart (double bottom agressive trades chart) before commenting, because I might not have put forth my thinking clearly.
Thanlks a lot for the hard working bunch!.
-Chandra