I Have A Grail, But Need A Pros To Help

This is closest thing to grail that i know of, outcome is ALWAYS A PROFIT!!!
There are no perfect HGs, and this one problem is margin......
before you ask, it is not a martingale
This is a grid method with logic ordering.

Once you test this baby, you will know what im talking about.
The one and only thing that can stop you from taking profits
is your margin, and I need all the help that I can find to
cut that to minimum!

I need a pro coder, tester, and pro trader with LOTS OF EXPERIENCE!!!
This WILL NOT BE PUBLIC, so send me a PM to [email protected]

Maybe this got your attention!!!
This is real and working.....need help to minimize need of big margin!

10k to 100k in 3 months

I'm not entirely sure what backtesting will tickle in terms of people's fancy, no offense but with the number of people claiming the same thing over and over until someone actually sees and forward tests it will they pay much attention to it without the inclination to ask for money upfront for their services.

Just giving you a general point, you may want to hug it to your chest but it's sorta counter-productive to say you could have something good but can't really give much proof. Even theoretical proof, backtesting just isn't reliable. It's necessary more often than not, but not a good indicator of whether or not the system is profitable.

Some general info would be welcome ya dig? Drawdowns, timeframes, main indicators or currency pairs. People have different preferences, if you chirp a few things that resonates with someone else (for example I like using multiple time frames) then chances are they will nudge you.

Perhaps a tad pointless for me to be this long winded but the moment struck me as such.

Here is a proof

You need to set up the 3 buy stop orders and the 3 sell stop orders away in equal increments from a middle starting point. Then all you have to do is to have the EA triggering each level placing pending orders on the rest of the levels but the one is at. If it is at a buy level, the EA must place pending orders only above that buy level is at with the initial lot size and in the 3 sell levels with any lot size you choose (usually twice the initial lot size). If the price is at a sell level, the EA must place pending orders only below the sell level is at with the initial lot size and in the 3 buy levels with any lot size you choose (usually twice the initial lot size).
No matter where the market moves, when one of the top or the bottom targeted prices is hit, profit will be made. in fact the longer it takes to reach such point, the more money it will make.
Basically what will happen is that all pending orders in one of the two sides will have been triggered but not all of the pending orders in the other side will have been triggered. Hence the unbalance, and therefore the profit. In order for the broker to win and take your money, it would have to have opened most orders in both sides but it has to do it sequentially. In other words, the broker would have to open up-down-up-down-up-down until it triggers all orders. Since you are placing more orders every time the broker triggers one, the broker cannot catch up with you because it has to go all the way to the opposite side to trigger the ones you opened in that side. As you can see the pending orders widen making it a long way for the broker to keep going to each side every time you place more pending orders. This is how you win, because the broker is limited eventually by the real market price going in a trend.
Take the current price (at any time) and from that moment on calculate how many pips the open orders make. Subtract the open orders to any target, the upper target or the lower target. What I mean is take all the sell orders and calculate to the stop loss for instance and then the buy orders to the profit or the opposite take the sell orders and calculate to the profit and then the buy orders to the stop loss.

Put this on paper, an do a little calculations, and you will be sure that it always ends in profit!!!

Ah, to sort of nail something on the head...

Excessive usage of exclamation points and using bold text as a precursor to it makes it sound like you are a used car salesmen. Not a judgment, it just reads that way to me. Sort of like an internet ad or e-mail spam going "YOU CAN HAVE A LARGER PENIS NOW!!!!"

Again, not a judgement... Just pointing out that if you want to catch something interesting you have to show enough to prove that it just might be. Not things that are easily fobbed.

God what is the point of me saying all this, sleep deprivation is most likely getting the best of me

So I assume this is a scalping saddle system, what I can interpret from you though is that it just uses incremental lots.

To be honest i've never understood people thinking that their broker is out to get them personally, to move their numbers as such as to ONLY affect you strikes me as an amazingly large waste of time/effort.

Market Makers might try and stop out some of the larger people or large groups of smallers sure assuming they took an opposite entry (which would show a lack of client filtering, so why go for an unprofessional broker anyway)

Less talking, more working....
Put this on paper, and then play smart!!!

Backtested with 50% correct data... forget it!
You need to trade it live to see how it works... backtesting with Metatrader is flawed.

Nobody even bothered to understand the system,
but yet everybody thinks he understund it.
Brokers can not stop this system, only your margin can!

He's pointing out the obvious and a sentiment that most people agree with, backtesting with metatrader proves very little.