DislikedYeah,
I tested it too and its only about 97.5% acurate. Oh well, I'll just wait for something better...for free.Ignored
- #101
- Feb 8, 2007 1:05pm Feb 8, 2007 1:05pm
- Joined Mar 2006 | Status: THANK YOU MERLIN,TWEE and FF Team | 4,603 Posts
bo7a method... method for GBP/JPY 205 replies
The Pouria EA Development Thread 461 replies
(pouria method II on the test) 218 replies
Inquiry of 400:1 leverage method 11 replies
Simple trading method 49 replies
DislikedYeah,
I tested it too and its only about 97.5% acurate. Oh well, I'll just wait for something better...for free.Ignored
DislikedYeah,
I tested it too and its only about 97.5% acurate. Oh well, I'll just wait for something better...for free.Ignored
Dislikednitro4x
It looks nice promising .......... but a couple of things .......
--> Are you adding spreads? This is very important! Some are charged 10 pips ......
--> are you only taking trades when the Averages Cross & the MACD line up exactly or are you allowing one or two candles for the MACD to come in line?
--> You have to manually ..... drop down the vertical lines ...... otherwise it looks pretty ..... but pretty .... and actual are not the same.
--> Pouria looks good ..... but forward testing .... will tell it all .... I noticed that you have to allow one candle beyond the cross to be sure .... its real and not just .... pretty. Conclusions on my manual back teasting on GBP/JPY ..... I think this would trade quite profitably .... but it is not the Holy Grail. It on first glance appears to be .... but I don't think that it is.
The EA will help us to back test quicker and better and ...... and I am anxiously anticipating its arrival any day now. mikhaildgreat is working on the EA. IMO
Ignored
DislikedWhy do we wait for the next candle? So if it crosses this hour dont take it? This is a new rule? Explain please.Ignored