Quoting clam61Dislikedits basically murrey mathIgnored
I have read all the details on that, and am very pleased to be able to inform you that it's actually a lot simpler, less interpretive and more accurate.
Maybe it would be a good idea to find out about it before you make this type of suggestion. I can show you on a webcast if you like. I have one on 11 December at 8.00PST, if you'd like to join us. It's free and covers the concept.
The framework is there; we just have to work on our frame of mind.