Rick - is this the right one?
Attached File(s)
Supernova GBP/JPY Mini Trend Catcher
- #4,581
- Jan 27, 2008 2:40pm Jan 27, 2008 2:40pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
- #4,583
- Jan 27, 2008 3:12pm Jan 27, 2008 3:12pm
- Joined Jun 2007 | Status: Unconventionable Conventionist | 2,768 Posts
Hi Matt,
Welcome back! No you don't need the Imran indicator. He just combines the original 2 on one indicator pane and applies some smoothing. So no need to use a new indicator. I am anxious to see the tests on this. It was really tricky to program and will probably need some optimization to get the best signals.
Rick
OK, thanks for the untangling on this issue!
So my template is up to date and I will start up the platform now to be ready on time. Best Wishes!
Matt
- #4,585
- Jan 27, 2008 5:22pm Jan 27, 2008 5:22pm
- | Commercial User | Joined Apr 2007 | 8,331 Posts
That's the demo up and running and Sydney open.
At least, I thought Sydney was open. FxMarketHours shows Sydney not opening until tomorrow. Oz on holiday today?
Ah well. Pips awayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
At least, I thought Sydney was open. FxMarketHours shows Sydney not opening until tomorrow. Oz on holiday today?
Ah well. Pips awayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
Just got home from work and it looks like all but one statement is being published. Really glad that part is working.
schedule sounds great. I am live testing on my real acount as well using mini lots, so far up 180pips in 3 days. I manually closed and left a lot on the table last week.
Ken Pipsqueaker
"See you on the Pipside"
- #4,591
- Jan 27, 2008 8:46pm Jan 27, 2008 8:46pm
Good point, I've got that one too! 
Thanks wolfeman!
yes, acs is what irman uses in his thread but the EA rick has coded up seems to be calling up the CustomIndicator("Laguerre"). If you don't have the exact same indicator (down to the spelling), then the EA will throw an error message.
- #4,593
- Jan 28, 2008 12:45am Jan 28, 2008 12:45am
Hi Testers,
Very interesting first few hours. The GBPUSD executed for many of us as a long and then prompltly reversed direction. That's trading Some of the indicators reacted well and got us out early, while other got us out later. But look at the QQE_VOL test! It avoided the long and caught the reversal!
This is what we need to see. First, are there bugas in the indicators. Then, which indicators are performing best. We really don't care as much about profitability since we are really restricting the EA. We need to see correctness according to the rules. When we add the indis back to gether, things get fun again.
I am measuring equity swings for the future MM/RM enhancements and this is good data.
Rick
Very interesting first few hours. The GBPUSD executed for many of us as a long and then prompltly reversed direction. That's trading
Some of the indicators reacted well and got us out early, while other got us out later. But look at the QQE_VOL test! It avoided the long and caught the reversal!This is what we need to see. First, are there bugas in the indicators. Then, which indicators are performing best. We really don't care as much about profitability since we are really restricting the EA. We need to see correctness according to the rules. When we add the indis back to gether, things get fun again.
I am measuring equity swings for the future MM/RM enhancements and this is good data.
Rick
- #4,594
- Jan 28, 2008 2:20am Jan 28, 2008 2:20am
Hey O, mine is running and we have our 1st 1HR T3 test trade in progress on the GBP/USD with +5 PIPS... we are all done no need to proceed....
schedule sounds great. I am live testing on my real acount as well using mini lots, so far up 180pips in 3 days. I manually closed and left a lot on the table last week.
Hi PipSqueaker,
That's great. What settings are you using? One of the asessments we will make by running the indi's separately is which seem most effective. Then we will come up with promising collections. These will also, in all likelihood, be different for different TF's. It would be great to start collecting successful setups in advance.
Rick
- #4,595
- Jan 28, 2008 2:35am Jan 28, 2008 2:35am
Update:
These first few hours are going really well. Many of the indicators did a good job of filtering out a troublesome GBPUSD. Market open is always risky as there is not much volatility, so indicators do not behave as well as they do when volatility increases. The same is true of the dead zone. I usually wait until the London open to begin trading on Monday and our data may lead me to add a market open input so that traders can specify a time to accept new trades after market open.
It is interesting to see that Vol took the opposite trade after the down spike. Also notice that QQE alone is not a great exit indi (so far). It definitely likes help. My own observations are that QQE alternate TF (Matt's idea) using the trade with long term trend input improves QQE substantially. Also, QQE is much better by itself for the H4 and Daily TF's (which I often trade) while other indi's get better for shorter TF's.
Also, note how CCI got us out of trouble really effectively.
Lots of good data, so far.
Rick
These first few hours are going really well. Many of the indicators did a good job of filtering out a troublesome GBPUSD. Market open is always risky as there is not much volatility, so indicators do not behave as well as they do when volatility increases. The same is true of the dead zone. I usually wait until the London open to begin trading on Monday and our data may lead me to add a market open input so that traders can specify a time to accept new trades after market open.
It is interesting to see that Vol took the opposite trade after the down spike. Also notice that QQE alone is not a great exit indi (so far). It definitely likes help
. My own observations are that QQE alternate TF (Matt's idea) using the trade with long term trend input improves QQE substantially. Also, QQE is much better by itself for the H4 and Daily TF's (which I often trade) while other indi's get better for shorter TF's.Also, note how CCI got us out of trouble really effectively.
Lots of good data, so far.
Rick