If in fact is was based on FACTS. Then I would readily agree.
Like the expression goes "Opinions are like a..holes. We all have one"
Edit: Rememeber how this all started - with me pointing out that a trendline with two points is indeed a trendline. Not according to you. Well to me that is a difference of opinion. Not fact. Why couldn't you accept that and move on. Since your opinion is all that matters here, adios.
1. What tf is this chart
2. Why are you over here harassing people on this thread as well
) I know you are a terrific trader and I look forward to your insight here if you have any to contribute 
Son of a beesting!
I go away (burp) for a few hours and holy smoke breaks looseA Norwegian fury is not something you want to be one the wrong end of. IMO. It is like huge cloud of punching fists with a big blonde beard . Yikes
That being said Skunny, do you have a chart or a project or something for us to work on today? Gann fibs or whatever would be welcome.
Dagoods I agree with your fib... I kinda have to since thats how i drew it too
Islander, I dig your charts are you making a... gann grid perhaps? and yeah I have been trying to figure out time since before day 1. It is my obsession. That and spicy garlic buffalo wings.
Sizz
I feel the same way. The more I trade with VHands, the more questions I am encountering. Where and when to walk the fib? And is every larger swing that encounters a break likely to hit its target? I think not. In the same way we don't let our smaller fibs cross boundaries of the larger ones, it seems the reverse is also true. When a smaller swing hits it's target, price sometimes reverses all the way into the oppiste direction, hitting the bigger swing's stop.
One day I traded VHands almost perfectly. But after re-reading some posts, and trying to spot reversals, and where to properly adjust the fibs, it seems the reason a bigger swing trade can go bad is because the smaller swing hit it's target. So bigger time frames rule the smaller ones, but can the smaller ones at times also rule the bigger ones? I not sure, but in some sense it must be true.
Hi Sizz - I guess that I maybe making some sort of Gann grid, but its very much trying to interpret Skunnys comments and extrapolate from his posted charts - so further comments will be appreciated. In hindsight I can see that a couple of my lines are slightly missplaced for correct contact, but you can see the valid contact points.
What I am not certain about is the possible validity of the two green lines on the right of my chart. As they are gann lines and so fixed angle, the very right one also has two touches and I thus would think has some validity for a future TP. The one to the left of it only has its initial point - the last hourly swing high and its angle and is therefore waiting for a (less) possible confirmation by price action in the future.
IMO the very nature of working off the last data will mean starting with fewer contact points and waiting for future confirmation.
Here is a picture of GJ Daily. Hope this helps to explain.
Jon
Jon,
for what its worth. 15 cents prolly. IMO... the M1 started with a 1M if that makes sense and the targets are open until price is hit and they are done. Doesn't mean price can;t sky rocket to like 2xx in the interim.
What eggzachary were your vhands findings?
Sizz.
