The strength of BE system | Page 13 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Related Instruments

EUR/USD, Gold/USD

Similar Threads

Trading system using relative strength 2,816 replies

Trading System Using Relative Strength-Part 2 1,499 replies

Relative Strength Basket Trading System 3,479 replies

Trading system based on individual currency strength 12 replies

Strength positioning system (PA) 6 replies

Attachments: The strength of BE system
Exit Attachments

The strength of BE system

  • #241
  • Feb 12, 2026 6:50pm Feb 12, 2026 6:50pm
Quoting rogerha
Been a bit quiet on the thread, apologies. IMO the EA is flawed, no disrespect to the AI that built it. Been trading it and watching it, firstly it is resource-heavy, so it brings your platform to a standstill. It doesn't place trades because it places orders incorrectly. Its lotsize calculation isn't working properly. It doesn't manage trades within the original constraints. However I think conceptually, it has some potential. If you are trusting backtests or forward tests on this, my opinion you aren't getting the full picture of a mean-reversion...
Greetings guys, we're all adults here let's keep it that way. In fact, I agree a little with rogerha with the EA being a bit lumpy, not saying it's flawed (though not saying it isn't, since I haven't personally tested it thoroughly).

rogerha I understand your skepticism (since it was made by an AI, so there is bound to be doubt), your comments are much appreciated and I am wondering if you could perhaps provide some images of the errors/mismanagements that you have seen. You are testing on FX pairs, right? That in and of itself might be the reason for the lack of functionality. Might I inquire if you have gotten any Invalid SL/TPs or anything of that sort (because potentially it might be something to do with the pips/decimal places or something of the like).

Cfudge can you explain your SL consistency problems? I think it might be due to the fact you have the Local Swing SL, but I am unsure. There might also be a misunderstanding of the inputs.

I am wondering if everyone could report any anomalies that they might be seeing in detail so I can dig deeper and make this a better EA --that is what I am here for.
Same goes for any potential additions/filters (or anything like that).
  • #242
  • Feb 12, 2026 7:47pm Feb 12, 2026 7:47pm
Quoting Realblank
{quote} Greetings guys, we're all adults here let's keep it that way. In fact, I agree a little with rogerha with the EA being a bit lumpy, not saying it's flawed (though not saying it isn't, since I haven't personally tested it thoroughly). rogerha I understand your skepticism (since it was made by an AI, so there is bound to be doubt), your comments are much appreciated and I am wondering if you could perhaps provide some images of the errors/mismanagements that you have seen. You are testing on FX pairs, right? That in and of itself might be...
Thanks Realblank

I am not sure what rogerha means exactly, I am not a coder.

My reason for wondering about the SLs having huge disparities is because I am using % of account per trade, so while there will be differences because the balance is fluctuating, they should be closer together in amounts throughout the day.

In the pic below you will see the big differences while the position sizes are the same in most instances.

Chris
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: sl.jpg Size: 160 KB
  • #243
  • Feb 12, 2026 8:25pm Feb 12, 2026 8:25pm
Quoting cfudge
{quote} Thanks Realblank I am not sure what rogerha means exactly, I am not a coder. My reason for wondering about the SLs having huge disparities is because I am using % of account per trade, so while there will be differences because the balance is fluctuating, they should be closer together in amounts throughout the day. In the pic below you will see the big differences while the position sizes are the same in most instances. Chris {image}
Okay I might be stating the obvious here or I might be deeply mistaken, but isn't this somewhat expected since (I believe) you are using the Local Swing SL which by nature ends up giving you different (adaptive) SLs (on the highest price for the past X candles)? Not sure if you intended to have a fixed SL of about 150? Might I be missing or misunderstanding something?

Maybe it's best if you share the Chart if possible for that specific period to see why the EA might have behaved that way.
  • #244
  • Feb 12, 2026 8:57pm Feb 12, 2026 8:57pm
Quoting Realblank
{quote} Okay I might be stating the obvious here or I might be deeply mistaken, but isn't this somewhat expected since (I believe) you are using the Local Swing SL which by nature ends up giving you different (adaptive) SLs (on the highest price for the past X candles)? Not sure if you intended to have a fixed SL of about 150? Might I be missing or misunderstanding something? Maybe it's best if you share the Chart if possible for that specific period to see why the EA might have behaved that way.
Yes I am using adaptive SL with 7 candle lookback. But the actual amount of the trade opened should be set to the % of account. So yes different SL distances but position size is determined by the % of account balance.
That is how I understand the logic behind those settings.
  • #245
  • Feb 12, 2026 9:08pm Feb 12, 2026 9:08pm
Quoting cfudge
{quote} Yes I am using adaptive SL with 7 candle lookback. But the actual amount of the trade opened should be set to the % of account. So yes different SL distances but position size is determined by the % of account balance. That is how I understand the logic behind those settings.
Normally when we talk about % of the account it is not the size of the position. It is the size of the loss at the SL. So setting 2% then you accept a loss at 2% of the account. So the positions does not need to be at the same size, but the losses in $ should be the same.

Don't know if that is the case here, but it is the normal.
MetaTrader 4 - so many advantages.
  • #246
  • Feb 12, 2026 9:26pm Feb 12, 2026 9:26pm
Quoting RiskFighter
{quote} Normally when we talk about % of the account it is not the size of the position. It is the size of the loss at the SL. So setting 2% then you accept a loss at 2% of the account. So the positions does not need to be at the same size, but the losses in $ should be the same. Don't know if that is the case here, but it is the normal.
Yes that is what I am saying...the $ amount lost when SL is hit should be close to the same.

If you look at the trades highlighted in my previous post there are trades with losses ranging from $30 dollars to $100 dollars. That is not using % properly.

The EA is using different position sizes for trades but I am not sure what its logic is.
  • #247
  • Feb 12, 2026 9:43pm Feb 12, 2026 9:43pm
Okay I see what is going on (I think)

Essentially this is my bad, % of account (against the norm as pointed out by RiskFighter) determines SOLELY the position size NOT the SL (in my terms), the SL is solely determined based on which mode you have (adaptive or fixed). This means you will indeed get different SL $ amounts because of the fact that (currently) said % input does not affect your actual amount that you are "literally" risking (SLs). This is why that input is on the position sizing section. So yeah my bad, I guess the term "RiskPercent" does not correctly/generally apply here. Sorry about that.

If you guys want, I could implement a % Risk SL option of some sort.
  • #248
  • Feb 12, 2026 10:08pm Feb 12, 2026 10:08pm
Quoting Realblank
Okay I see what is going on (I think) Essentially this is my bad, % of account (against the norm as pointed out by RiskFighter) determines SOLELY the position size NOT the SL (in my terms), the SL is solely determined based on which mode you have (adaptive or fixed). This means you will indeed get different SL $ amounts because of the fact that (currently) said % input does not affect your actual amount that you are "literally" risking (SLs). This is why that input is on the position sizing section. So yeah my bad, I guess the term "RiskPercent"...
"If you guys want, I could implement a % Risk SL option of some sort."

But keep the option that you have programmed now. Never delete anything that is working, before something better has been proved.
MetaTrader 4 - so many advantages.
  • #249
  • Feb 12, 2026 10:22pm Feb 12, 2026 10:22pm
Quoting RiskFighter
{quote} "If you guys want, I could implement a % Risk SL option of some sort." But keep the option that you have programmed now. Never delete anything that is working, before something better has been proved.
Yes of course (I saw your post about the calculation, yeah, I think I know about those problems with division by Zero (it happens everywhere ).

So just to confirm you do want me to implement this Standard SL% option (as an added option)? What are your thoughts Cfudge? Or shall I wait for us to perhaps gather some other modifications/additions (reached by testing) that could be useful/needed (that way I am not constantly putting a new version of the EA per se)?
  • #250
  • Feb 12, 2026 10:32pm Feb 12, 2026 10:32pm
Quoting Realblank
{quote} Yes of course (I saw your post about the calculation, yeah, I think I know about those problems with division by Zero (it happens everywhere ). So just to confirm you do want me to implement this Standard SL% option (as an added option)? What are your thoughts Cfudge? Or shall I wait for us to perhaps gather some other modifications/additions (reached by testing) that could be useful/needed (that way I am not constantly putting a new version of the EA per se)?
I deleted the calculation because it works only on Forex.

5:30 am here. Time for bed :-)
MetaTrader 4 - so many advantages.
  • #251
  • Feb 12, 2026 10:38pm Feb 12, 2026 10:38pm
Quoting Realblank
{quote} Yes of course (I saw your post about the calculation, yeah, I think I know about those problems with division by Zero (it happens everywhere ). So just to confirm you do want me to implement this Standard SL% option (as an added option)? What are your thoughts Cfudge? Or shall I wait for us to perhaps gather some other modifications/additions (reached by testing) that could be useful/needed (that way I am not constantly putting a new version of the EA per se)?
Hi Realblank
I would say let's wait. I have things I have been testing for the last 2 weeks, 2 different approaches to this system and I want to wait till the weekend to put it all together and then present the results here.

Thank you for sticking with the EA for us.

Chris

PS: I was wondering about the time in Denmark Riskfighter..........LOL
  • #252
  • Edited 8:32pm Feb 13, 2026 4:35pm | Edited 8:32pm
I made a new demo account for this. The system were up and running right after noon today. Setting the exact parameters as stated in post #183. Running 1M Gold. Only difference is, that I am using fixed lotsize of 0.1 just like Pusztafie. A 2% gave me an error 134, which is "Not enough money".

Loss 336$.

No value in this half friday result. Just to show that I am running from monday morning. Goal is to have several days where my results are following the cfudge results, before I begin to think about improvements. Can never be the same of cause, with different brokers.



Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 14 KB
MetaTrader 4 - so many advantages.
  • #253
  • Feb 13, 2026 8:41pm Feb 13, 2026 8:41pm
Quoting cfudge
{quote} Here are the results for today (we had a power outage yesterday and I missed the first 1/2 hour of trading, so there looks like a couple more SL but nothing too significant. 52 trades 33 win $2410.00 19 SL -($1036.00) $1374.00 total gained 9 day total $3763.00 Chris
Here are the results for today

19 wins $1914.00

40 SL -($2531.00)

$-(617.00)

10 day total $3099.00

Chris
  • #254
  • Feb 13, 2026 8:45pm Feb 13, 2026 8:45pm
Quoting RiskFighter
I made a new demo account for this. The system were up and running right after noon today. Setting the exact parameters as stated in post #183. Running 1M Gold. Only difference is, that I am using fixed lotsize of 0.1 just like Pusztafie. A 2% gave me an error 134, which is "Not enough money". Loss 336$. No value in this half friday result. Just to show that I am running from monday morning. Goal is to have several days where my results are following the cfudge results, before I begin to think about improvements. Can never be the same of cause,...
Hi RiskFighter

Yeah! Today was not a good day to start testing...LOL

I want to show my trade result graph for the last 10 days...Feb. 2 to Feb 13.

If I remember correctly the account as of Feb 2 was around $2300.00 to $2500.00

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: feb 2 to feb 13 graph.jpg Size: 53 KB
  • #255
  • Edited 9:48pm Feb 13, 2026 9:28pm | Edited 9:48pm
Quoting cfudge
{quote} Hi RiskFighter Yeah! Today was not a good day to start testing...LOL I want to show my trade result graph for the last 10 days...Feb. 2 to Feb 13. If I remember correctly the account as of Feb 2 was around $2300.00 to $2500.00 {image}
So 10 days is beginning to be some basic data to analyze the conditions. If you look into the log you can find the days that those trades were running and then manually draw 9 vertical lines in order to show the days. With this tool it is possible to go into the different days on HTF. We might learn something that can help with some kind of multi timeframe analysis/tools for this strategy.

Example: If the daily chart showed some kind of PA telling that next day might be steep trending? Can we then in advance be warned about the next days trading and can we develop filters that help for trends and invoke these before the actual trading takes place? Or maybe just not be trading the following day. No trades = no loss.

Just thinking out loud.
MetaTrader 4 - so many advantages.
  • #256
  • Feb 13, 2026 9:39pm Feb 13, 2026 9:39pm
In general it is of great value to have data from larger periods. But at the same time we want to play with the settings to improve the strategy.

Therefore it is advisable to have minimum 2 demo accounts for this system.

 

  1. Should be running untouched for longer periodes. Only touched when there is an update in the strategy which is believed to be the future, based on analysed test results. A change log could be of value.
  2. This is the play box. You can do whatever you like. Data will not be consistant over time, but that is not important. Example: You want to switch to another timeframe to follow an idea. This means that trading data will be corrupted. Then statistics are not valid for some extend.

Even more accounts could be used to play out different ideas on a daily basic.

MetaTrader 4 - so many advantages.
  • #257
  • Feb 13, 2026 9:46pm Feb 13, 2026 9:46pm
My consern is to have a consistant development. We have seen so many threaths were people did changes frequently in the meaning og improving the strategy, and what seemed to be a good idea, was turned into a fiasko by constantly changing the strategy and never keeping a track of what was really working.
MetaTrader 4 - so many advantages.
  • #258
  • Feb 13, 2026 9:51pm Feb 13, 2026 9:51pm
Allright. 5am is coming up. I need to watch some funny Youtube to empty my brain in order to get some sleep.
MetaTrader 4 - so many advantages.
  • #259
  • Edited 11:27pm Feb 13, 2026 9:58pm | Edited 11:27pm
Quoting RiskFighter
In general it is of great value to have data from larger periods. But at the same time we want to play with the setting to improve the strategy. Therefore it is advisable to have minimum 2 demo accounts for this system. Should be running untouched for longer periodes. Only touched when there is an update in the strategy which is believed to be the future, based on analysed test results. A change log could be of value. This is the play box. You can do whatever you like. Data will not be consistant over time, but that is not important. Example: You...
To that point I would like to show some figures for the way we are trading this right now and then show results for 2 other ideas I have tested along side this regular one for the past 2 weeks. I will call the 3 wayS as follows REGULAR---MULTI BANDS---MULTI BANDS W/RECOVERY TRADES.

Results for 10 days are in pips and $ amounts. I took an average trade position size of 0.06 which is $1.6/pip (I think that is correct)

REGULAR $3,146.00/1967 pips

MULTI BANDS $19,437.00/12148 pips

MULTI BANDS W/ RECOVERY TRADES $12,264.00/7665 pips

I will be putting the rules and screen shots and a video out tomorrow highlighting these 2 additional ways of trading this system.

Chris

PS: I hope everyone can see what I am doing here. I have started this thread with an idea and 2 indicators. I did not want this system (or any of my systems) to end up 10 or 20 pages in and it be unrecognizable from what was presented in the beginning. Basically I did not want to throw indicator after indicator at this and end up with a rainbow...I feel the changes made have helped with profits and this new idea is within these guidelines, it is still the same two indicators I started with with a few tweaks.
  • #260
  • Feb 14, 2026 3:27am Feb 14, 2026 3:27am
Quoting cfudge
{quote} To that point I would like to show some figures for the way we are trading this right now and then show results for 2 other ideas I have tested along side this regular one for the past 2 weeks. I will call the 3 wayS as follows REGULAR---MULTI BANDS---MULTI BANDS W/RECOVERY TRADES. Results for 10 days are in pips and $ amounts. I took an average trade position size of 0.06 which is $1.6/pip (I think that is correct) REGULAR $3,146.00/1967 pips MULTI BANDS $19,437.00/12148 pips MULTI BANDS W/ RECOVERY TRADES $12,264.00/7665 pips I will be...
Exactly. You are not testing and integrating several systems on the same demo. You are separating them. That is very wise.
MetaTrader 4 - so many advantages.
3 traders viewing now