🚫 the super ea banned from mql5

We will go through a new update:
The creation of a fork, a connection between what we already have and a new implementation in which I have been conducting some tests.
My goal is to generate integration with a volume footprint analysis strategy, using data processing techniques that in my tests have proven to be very efficient.
As can be seen below, I have been developing an indicator to trade in various markets, mainly those that require great precision and speed, such as the XAU/USD asset.
The results below represent a single trading day and brought very important data that I want to integrate into the expert advisor.
This will not be an easy task due to the amount of data the indicator generates. However, I have been considering creating a call in the expert advisor so that it loads the indicator separately, processes the data received, and then takes the initiative to open an order or not.
This will be the first attempt. If it does not work as I imagine, I will have to research and integrate it differently later.
I believe we will have something even more efficient in a few days, which should amplify and further improve the quality of what we have already developed.

For one week everything is going very well.

A new update is ready, and for that reason, I am returning here to communicate:
Added features:

- Balance percentage control.
- Virtual balance control where the EA bases its strategy on the virtual balance set by the user and not on the account balance.
- Automatic lot increase.

In theory, this new update tends to yield something equivalent to 105 per month with a very well-controlled drawdown.
The account has been added for monitoring under the name EA GOLD IN$IDER, which can be observed on my profile.


To acquire this EA, contact via TELEGRAM @code88br and mention EA Gold In$ider

The new version seeks to stabilize the drawdown by addressing the main factor: profitability.
Thus, the backtest over the last 5 years shows a stable return of around 10% per month, in a very safe manner.
This is not a guarantee that returns will always exceed 10%, but that the 5-year average shows monthly returns in this range, with well-balanced drawdown and without exposing the user to unnecessary risks.

So I leave the question: In the last 5 years, how many frustrations have you had?
How many trading accounts have you lost due to not having a suitable Expert Advisor?
This EA has remained safe and profitable over the last 5 years of backtesting.

To acquire this EA, contact via TELEGRAM @code88br and mention EA Gold In$ider

The new version seeks to stabilize the drawdown by addressing the main factor: profitability.
Thus, the backtest over the last 5 years shows a stable return of around 10% per month, in a very safe manner.
This is not a guarantee that returns will always exceed 10%, but that the 5-year average shows monthly returns in this range, with well-balanced drawdown and without exposing the user to unnecessary risks.

So I leave the question: In the last 5 years, how many frustrations have you had?
How many trading accounts have you lost due to not having a suitable Expert Advisor?
This EA has remained safe and profitable over the last 5 years of backtesting.

To acquire this EA, contact via TELEGRAM @code88br and mention EA Gold In$ider
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
https://www.forexfactory.com/attachm...l?d=1776104975
https://www.forexfactory.com/attachm...l?d=1776105027
https://www.forexfactory.com/attachm...l?d=1776105040

Is There Such a Thing as the Perfect EA?
I've asked myself this question for a long time...
Experts and academics alike always respond the same way:
“It's impossible.”
They claim that anything related to this subject is a joke — after all, not even Harvard PhDs have managed to create such a thing.
But what would become of the nonconformists if impossibility did not exist?
Without it, we wouldn't dare to walk the obscure path of the unknown — a path too intimidating for most of those formed in the world’s top institutions.
They lack the courage to question the very foundation of what they were taught.

A Question That Never Left Me:
“Does an EA really need to be extremely complex — accounting for multiple economic factors and even unpredictable political or institutional decisions — to be effective?”
Maybe not.
Maybe a well-structured mathematical formula is all it takes.
What if we could strip away all that unnecessary complexity, and focus only on mathematics to determine when to enter and exit trades?
While others suffer from fear, taxes, volatility, emotional pressure, and margin calls...
We remain grounded in the mathematical logic of our system.

From Theory to Test:
This was all just an idea in my head at first.
I had the calculations.
I had the logic.
But MetaTrader 4 had its limitations.
I couldn’t fully test the outcome due to the lack of flexibility in built-in variables.
We always need to add some conditions — like Take Profit, distance between orders, etc.
Then came the idea:

The Structure of the Cycle:

1. Open an initial order of 0.02 lots in any direction
2. Place two opposite pending orders of 0.01 lots at predefined risk distances
3. These pending orders act as price stabilizers, locking in losses within an acceptable range
4. When price reaches a significant distance again — a new cycle is launched

And the goal?
To mathematically imbalance the system in favor of a global take profit —
...at which point, all orders are closed together in profit.

No Indicators. No Patterns. Just Math.
Forget signals. Forget candlestick formations. Forget overbought or oversold zones.
The chart itself becomes irrelevant.
Because this strategy is based purely on MATH —
The same force that won Nobel Prizes for past scientists.
They changed the world through numbers.

Call Me Crazy? Maybe. But So Was Einstein.
Yes, many who read this might say:
“This is madness. It can’t work.”
But guess what?
Einstein was also called mad — until his theories proved to be more accurate than anyone imagined.
His ideas still shock scientists even today.

The Results So Far:
In my initial 30-day test,
This simple mathematical logic returned over 200% profit.
Without indicators.
Without complex algorithms.
Just structured logic.
Just mathematics.

FOR THOSE SEEKING A SAFE WAY TO TRADE THE FOREX MARKET
Please review this extended-period backtest of the EA provided here in this topic.
Inside the File:

1. A robust backtest conducted over the last 5 years for rigorous stress testing and profitability analysis.
2. All technical data, parameters, and metrics are fully included within the file.

Interested? Contact directly via Telegram: @code88br

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1S_P...ew?usp=sharing

Today available for only $99.
Contact me via TELEGRAM @code88br

Today available for only $99.
Contact me via TELEGRAM @code88br

Today available From $499 to $99 OPEN SOURCE CODE.
Contact me via TELEGRAM @code88br

Today available From $499 to $99 OPEN SOURCE CODE.
Contact me via TELEGRAM @code88br

We created an auto-lot version for those who are looking for a slightly more aggressive growth.
In our client and trading group, users are setting aside 10% of their main account and connecting it to this version.
The goal is to achieve growth 8 times faster than the standard version of the EA.

What would normally take 8 weeks, or 2 months, is expected to be achieved in about 10 days.
It is flowing very well and the results are promising.

This auto-lot version, which automatically calculates the lot size, also brings fixes for bugs generated by the MetaTrader platform itself, such as freezing when there is a very high data flow.

The EA first performs data processing to execute orders more precisely and read the market more cleanly.

Upon acquisition, both versions are sent.
Contact me via TELEGRAM @code88br

1 month

2 month in backtest

3 months