Disliked{quote} No, cannot stack on one challenge. My 20% off purchase was done like 2 weeks ago. I have not taken advantadge of this new offer. So, yes, ultimately I could pick up 2....one at 20% off and one at 19% off.Ignored
Featured US Prop Firms
{quote} I am always open to looking, if you can show it in real numbers. I just cannot see how it could ever be beneficial when you are INITIALLY paying more for what they are actually giving you....I mean $860 for a $1200 max loss with 50% split....so $860 for $600.........how do you ever recover from that? Especially when for $500 you can do $100K high stakes which offers 8K (10K loss @80%) which, even better than FTMO only requires 1.3, so would be $1,150 in personal, offering a value of 6.95?
Regarding HyperGrowth, if we only consider what we get on the first level it would be a big no. As you mentioned it would give negative value over the investmet, but what can make it worth is the scaling plan. I'm taking the smallest account which costs $260 for the calculation. If we just compare side by side the results on both accounts with the same target ratio, the personal account would be a no brainner all the time. The return is about 7.5x higher on the personal account:
I believe that is not a fair comparison since the personal account is compounding all the profits while the instant account is taking payouts along the way. One better comparison would be to keep all the profits in the instant account, which would make the target ratio smaller at each level. Instead of only the DD allowance, I'm also adding all profits made (after split) as risk in this table. In this scenario the instant account gives a better result from level 4 on, getting to about 3,91x the return in comparison:
Another fair comparison would be to put all the profits into a personal account and compound it at the same rate. It starts to be positive from level 3 getting to about 1,92x in comparison to the personal account alone. This example would bring the highets return but it's definetely harder to achieve than the previous one for obvious reasons:
I'm not discussing how hard it might be or if it is even really achievable. I just wanna share that this model might give a positive perspective after the first levels. Probably most people won't even get above those first levels and in that case I agree that it's really totally not worth. It only becomes interesting for a longer perspective and for that reason I would only consider the most stablished and reputable companies.