20 days results.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
- #24
- Edited 7:25am May 27, 2025 6:54am | Edited 7:25am
- | Joined May 2009 | Status: Sucessful Praying FxTrader2Investor | 343 Posts
{quote} --- I've successfully implemented all the required changes to fix the issue with sell trades in the EA: 1. Modified the global variables: - Removed `double ZigZagValue;` //+------------------------------------------------------------------+ --- Download: {file}
Takes Both Sells and Buys on USDJPY... Tested For all 2025, on H4; H1 and m15
Try Different pairs then Optimize and See.
Current Schedule does not allow for my further Contribution But I know the feeling when one needs a Collaborative/ Community input.
..#P.S. used the Defaults seen on the modified version here,
..#AudUsd Shows Promise on m15, with both sells and Buys taken.
May I Suggest @ frxdhs Try taking a Muti-TimeFram Directionality Focused approach toyour MA Section.. This seems to lend itself beautifully to the triple time frame Groupings from that philosophy.
To that extent I used (H1-m15-m5) here and mapped that onto MA(60, 15, 5) for you results seen above. All else was left as came defaulted. These time frames are from the Metatrader4.0's nine(9) Fixed time frames: arranged in groups of threes such that there is at least a factor of "3x" between the neighbours in the group.
So taking Mn to M1; one would similarly get 7 or so other triple time frame groupings for directionality and those would similarly be used in your triple MA Approach.
Fo that extent, the lowest in the Group triple: would form the "test Time frame" or the hosting time frame. In the results seen here from H1-m15-m5, it was tested on m5.
Further for an example {D1-h4-h1} would be MA(1440;240;60) and tested on h1 . even {H4-h1-m15) would be MA(240;60;15) and tested on m15 .
Just some suggestions to assist your process. Terribly sorry personal time and resources do not allow for more inputs here at the moment.
Not necessarily a quid Pro Quo But if (yourself along with other participants here) are able: Do give an input by an effort i too am trying to get community effort on. . << https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...?goto=lastpost >>
Do, have Blessed Journey towards all your GOdly Endeavours.
Attachment g
- #27
- Edited 3:49am May 28, 2025 3:33am | Edited 3:49am
- | Joined May 2009 | Status: Sucessful Praying FxTrader2Investor | 343 Posts
actually this is not my strategy. I try to make an ea via chatgbt from datas from below website. maybe one of the master coder can make more profitable ea from that datas. https://www.myfxbook.com/strategies/...-test-2/255662
These Strategy Settings as reflected should be instructive in arriving at more optimal parameter for what you currently have.
P.S. Kingly say which AI instant did you employ and if you care to how did you manage to the actual execution from the idea you had to getting it to deliver your testable code. Really admirable imho. Good Stuff!
- #29
- Last Post: May 28, 2025 3:52am May 28, 2025 3:52am
- | Joined May 2009 | Status: Sucessful Praying FxTrader2Investor | 343 Posts
Had this done a day or so ago but with your sharing more of the origin and settings description Who know??
So now we have Gold, AUD and GBP.
Let us see what can be made of the afore posted settings. Seems from the source you provided, the related performances were Trained on Gold, ; 500:1. For the Test i have shared those were on 100:1 and $500.00 Starting balance.
So now we have Gold, AUD and GBP.
Let us see what can be made of the afore posted settings. Seems from the source you provided, the related performances were Trained on Gold, ; 500:1. For the Test i have shared those were on 100:1 and $500.00 Starting balance.