SWB Martingale EA

PS: I forgot to mention all of these are 1min TF as we are not banks and therefore need to be paid today or tomorrow not next year or decade. EG AUDNZD has been in consolidation since 2012. And EUR JPY since 1994. We dont have the patience for that nor does it make sense, so all my charts will and always are one minute.

@ Shamin1981, yes for many years many market conditions. The best EA I found since 2007

Which set did you use? Let's check it out. The quality is 25% , it's not very good

Thanks for getting back to me in regards to this Patron 150. Im not concerned about the quality because I know the numbers we are working with and visually I am watching it and see the trades will all be legitimately entered as the areas we are entering price will value there for a period of time to fill our positions. Think logicly here. If AUDUSD trades around 74/76 for months, this is fair value. If it explodes up to 80, or down to 70, our 1st question to ourselves is "are we covered?" If the answer is yes then we are happy, if the answer is no then it means we are not managing risk. I sugest everyone turns off the multiplyer and you will see foryourselves they always will cover 50% of these ranges. If price goers another 5k points, are we covered? If yes we are good . Its just numbers and working the ranges availible then dynamicly adjusting the tp in accordance with the range. MM will always reveal the range in MAX BB (4k) adjust your tp expectations to the new range if you like or simply trust your offside positions will be covered if we simply manage risk. Using the multiplyer is not managing risk. But we need something in the code to increase lots in order to grow the account once profitable baskets are closed. Id like to have it increase from 0.01 to 0.02 after 10 baskets are closed in profit. Can we do this?

PS My youtube videos are here but we are not discussing martingale. Its just speculation. But we all know speculators are not profitable so effectively all my videos are nonsense, hense why we are still studying this 18years later with no end in sight, (apart from swb) but you can follow if you like anyway. I may do some soon on SWB. https://www.youtube.com/@jonty172

NZDUSD has similar ranges but lower volatility. The targets will therefore need to be reduced slightly and the ranges reduced in the settings. However I will try 1st with AUDUSD volatility numbers which will be a very good test for the EA. In theory it should have no problems beating the NZD since it can beat the AUD on all date periods so far I have tried over the past 48 hours. If we remove the idea of Stops in our minds that were conditioned to us, we wont be concerned anymore, this will simply become a money making business rather than a hobby. And I believe this is how we do it. There is nothing to be scared of, EG if we dont get paid this cycle, its simply one time framing higher, the add ons are working to account for 1min move being projected through 5min fractal, because there is a move on that timeframe we did not see, due to our fixation with one timeframe. The reality is all timeframe folks are being paid, our job is to manage risk in the event in one time frames higher. (I call it a runaway move which is simply happening to close off a spread between two currency's we were no aware of due to our fixation on one chart, unfortunately we cant get the swb to read across all the currency's and then make a trade on one pair, if we could we would not be having this convo as we would be on the beach by now. But since MT$ will only let us fixate on one pair this is the only way it will work consistently over time. Get back to me please on the request I made in regards to adding in the equity curve ability. Very excited to see it in action. If we changed it for adding only on the next BB hit instead of the fixed range it would also free up capital/ margin, which would be a game changer in the code. Thanks again folks

6 Positions No problem

Another "scary"trade? Nope. As per picture 4 we observe Local sellers are being margine called, which means we now have permission to be on the buy side committed, given the face that A our target has not been fulfilled yet, which is not good for "their" books. Ans B we observe that the local sellers are not being paid. Which means they are margine calling them in the same way we would have been margine called on the way down had we not adjusted for volatility and managed risk by working the range given and refusal to gamble by using the lot multiplier, means we will remain in the game another trade.

This is why we are always wrong as retail, as we jump in with no information of past move or past anything. This level will be worked for a while in order to close the books as It was "brewing so long"

Reminder, we are doing NZDUSD on average AUDUSD Volatility settings, and its clearly proving itself as I record this in Testing real time with zero clue about what happens next. We can Repeat this on any Time Frame provided we adjust the range entry size to account for the MAX BB on the TF observed. If We Adjusted it for NZDUSD the results would be even better.

Another one here brewing. Reminder we are not using NZDUSD Target, we are using AUDUSD target as a test of strength of the EA, deliberately to try to test its limits. We cant do this on GBPUSD or it will blow up. Range Targets on NZ need to be at $2.20, AuD $2.80 and GBP would be close to $5, But the range would need to be changed from 70 to 140 on GBPUSD. Which quite frankly I dont have the stomach for.

Nzdusd complete. 26 June 2017 to present. Ultimately we run each pair individually on separate accounts assigned to each pair. So 2 pairs = 2 computers or 1 pc 2 separate platforms. Will release the settings when a coder sends us back to test collectively the code complete with the modifications I have suggested. Thanks again

GBPUSD It will cost $900 to play GbpUSD. Audusd $400 will do it, but as discussed GBP is twice the volatility in terms of its ranges and physical price in numbers. 75c AUDUSD cost to play $450, $1.30/40 = Double the game so double to cost to play and double the risk, however we should be able to get double the target price, which makes it worth it. In other words it wont work with a $400 account.

hello

wich set you use now ??
and TF, Pair, recomended spread

minimum deposit required

thanks

I tried SWB Grid on the AUDUSD using a demo account. This was fortunate as there was a pretty strong up uptrend folloed by downtrend. Although only using 0.1 stakes it caused severe damage the equity. I had an EA previously which did very well the first year doubling my equity but the following year it reduced the total down to one sixth which was a drawdown of about 80%. That to worked on a grid taking trades against the trend.