Disliked{quote} Live is still a liability at least initially. But a final liability. The thing about futures is the cost is so low, the margins are razor thin. I wouldn't be surprised if some of these futures shops are running on reserves now and trying to pivotIgnored
Look at APEX, $33 up front and then $85 for activation fee (was $130)....SO $118 FOR 2.5K DD, equivalent to $472 for 10K DD, which is right in line with a 100K 2 step forex firm with 10K DD.....plus consistency rules, tailing DD and payout caps
These are like 2 step challenges where you pay small for step 1 and then more for step 2 while you build your buffer.
These are indeed 2 step challenges if you can only withdrawal above the buffer....they are just more cleverly marketed as cheaper, 1 step evals.
The firms with the "no activation fee" are simply baking it into the eval cost. They make the "all-in" cost a little less, luring in those that are such great traders, they are going to pass in 1 go, so might as well take the lower cost. These firms are actually making more money as they charge more up front and I'm certain the pass rate is still the same.
Now the new, smarter (for the firm) model is straight to funded, pay 2-3 times more "all-in" cost than the 2 step and skip step 1 (the eval). Once again, you are nnot really straight to funded as you still must pass step 2 (the buffer). These companies are the smartest....charging even more up front and probably the same % will get to payout. These are also the ones with a "path to live" to remove you from their balance sheet once you hit 10K, 6 payouts or whatever that particular firms rules are.
I am pro- prop, when used properly as a means to accelerate your personal account 3-4 times quicker for the same "real $$$$ risk" as opposed to simply depositing into a personal account. However, the reality is, not nearly as good a deal as the clever marketing makes it appear.
5