Disliked{quote} The activity you describe is not the medicine prescribed. Theres no doubt they mislead/fraud whatever definition people want to call it. But it is not grounds for an SRO and it most definitely is not grounds for an ex parte case. What was done is vulgar over reach. IT could have been resolved with a Cease and desist and penalties very cleanly and easily. Instead they trumped up a story, which is a lie and has been proven a lie, in order to get an over reached SRO. Whilst both situations might be right, it does leave massive question as to...Ignored
MFF and their attack dog lawyers were having none of it.
Trade with confidence, trade without fear.