Turtle Soup Enthusiast

Shitty stonks cant even spike up

Missed my entry by 2 points even taking the spread into account.
I'm claiming a moral victory.
Did exactly as I predicted.
Hey Ho.
There's always tomorrow. And the next day. And the next.

Dollar Draw on liquidity for this week. Long live the United States of America

S&P 500.

Invalidation for ES at highs of previous week. Week 2 should provide a liquidity pool which shouldn't be touched if bearish. Euro idea going to plan. SMT with DXY right now. If we start making lower prices on Euro and higher on Dollar, true SMT.

Nice spot my friend.
A combination of concepts leading to a bias.

Seems to be some true believers here on this this thread; have you seen this?



Two sides to every story...

So which camp are you in, believer or sceptic?

Haha. For me I’ve never really cared about any of the talk of the algos real or not. I’ve backtested countless hours and his concepts work. In my opinion everything works. Even ‘retail’ strategies. You just have to have good mindset, which very few have. It’s just about what strategy resonates with you the best.

Wednesday LOTW profile. Change in state of delivery through a breaker. Funny how the chop fest ended in a range turtle soup. This on the Dollar was a case of multiple touches of a key level which isn’t preferable. However I seen this and adjusted stop placements. Profits running here. Range high is the target and then weekly highs. I gurantee the chop disheartened a lot of people and led them to believe a bearish dollar. The market will always try to sike most people out first.

You need to be more specific, that camp of his method works or don't work? Or the camp of his scam works and people paid money for nothing?

I have watched quite a few of his YT videos, and it appears to me that most of the controversial material centers around the smaller time frames trading and mainly Index from what I gather.

So maybe that theory works, maybe not, either way, the issue here is that he apparently scams people with false claims backed by false documentation; again, which camp are you in on that?

Maybe no one cares they got scammed, as it says in the video, once you believe, you pay, and the brain washing sticks.

There was a video on longer time frame price action that did make sense to me, so I had no problem understanding the concept he presented there; have a look.

There is no doubt he has vast trading knowledge, price action knowledge, and maybe even is profitable, so no problem with his concepts. In fact, I have posted his Weekly Bias video several times, it is a great concept and totally FREE.

The issue as pointed out in the videos is that he presented those concepts as enormously profitable, charged $150 per month, every month to how many thousands of gullible followers, and they won't admit to it for various reasons.

And the way he presented the profits has been shown to be deceptive and basically fraud; now we all know the Forex industry is full of massive scams, what is your opinion on that side of I.C.T.?

Not sure if i have dropped this here b4, sorry if i have

A few more.. I cant drop the MP4 stuff i have says file too big

And the way he presented the profits has been shown to be deceptive and basically fraud; now we all know the Forex industry is full of massive scams

Forex has always and always will be full of scams and gurus selling shit you can figure out yourself. GURUs only sell you Hope n dreams then fuckoff with your money and it will never change

Euro idea. That’s only if we take out the top first. No obligation to go there before continuing lower. But if it does I think that will happen.

I am not here to convince people one way or the other of the merits of ICT concepts.
Michael is a polarising figure.
I can only speak from my experience.
I have seen so much written about ICT.
Over the last 2 years it has become particularly prevalent, especially on YouTube.
The question that needs to be asked is why.
No one is attacking Niall Fuller, Justin Bennett, Nick Shawn or any of the other countless trading Gurus on the internet.
Yet everyone of them, without exception, is trying to sell a course, mentorship or trading system.
There is a lot of money to be made going this route. Especially when you can't trade.
Now what happens when someone shows you concepts that actually work. Sales drop.
Iman Trading is just another in a long line of failing traders who've had their easy money income stream smashed.
It is revealing that at the end of his video he credits Vinniy Emini for the content.

A man who won't even show his face to the camera in his videos.
A man who has been on a quest for 2 years trying to discredit ICT.
A man you has no verifiable track record.
A man who has tried and failed at every turn to get ICT into court to supposedly get scammed traders their money back who bought an ICT mentorship.

Well I bought a mentorship. There is so much content. And I am still learning 6 years on. What I can say is that his concepts work. I have poured over charts for as long as I can remember. Everywhere I look I see repeatable things just like ICT teaches. So for me I am firmly in the camp of believer in what he has taught.
Others will always disagree. And that's fine.
As too all the drama that goes on around ICT. I take it all with a pinch of salt. I have watched it go on for so long. Even back when he was on Baby Pips.
It's just that now it has become more vociferous.

As I stated at the beginning of this post everyone will form their own opinion. I have mine. Others will take a different view. I am not here to change that.