Dislikeds.b say FL is a ftr that break a sr or lsk s.b say Fl is a ftr that hold price up or down .break of fl make new fl in both insight.Ignored
Readthemarket (Ifmyante) - Is it legit stuff or not? 19 replies
Price Will Tell - Supply/Demand Price Action Trading 1,858 replies
Price Action + Demand & Supply Zone + Money Management 0 replies
Price movement as a function of Supply and Demand 43 replies
Suppy, Demand and Price Action 28 replies
Dislikeds.b say FL is a ftr that break a sr or lsk s.b say Fl is a ftr that hold price up or down .break of fl make new fl in both insight.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thanks a lot, I really appreciate your help! I checked the history of the area you mentioned, and yes indeed I noticed that the price is affected by it. I'll keep an eye on the situation as it evolves, thanks again. I hope to learn as much as possible, I've been working at 300% to understand all these concepts for quite a few months nowIgnored
Disliked{quote} That setup didnt work. But price went up a bit and found a very similar place with a FTR, and my reasoning is, the level we considered is lower scale. The level price actually drawn to is higher scale. because it is visible in m30 also.Ignored
Disliked{quote} That setup didnt work. But price went up a bit and found a very similar place with a FTR, and my reasoning is, the level we considered is lower scale. The level price actually drawn to is higher scale. because it is visible in m30 also.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Only the 4th one from the bottom is a FTR. Others are not FTRs. Let's ignore the first FTR for the moment, because we cannot say it is a FTR or not, because we dont have anything to the left in that chart. So it is hard to say if it is a FTR or not. See the second one. second FTR from the bottom touches the 1st FTR. Third FTR touches the second FTR. What is FTR? "Failure to Return". They have not failed to return!. So they are not FTRs. But 4th one.. It has not returned to the 3rd FTR. So it has failed to return to the previous one. It is...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Only the 4th one from the bottom is a FTR. Others are not FTRs. Let's ignore the first FTR for the moment, because we cannot say it is a FTR or not, because we dont have anything to the left in that chart. So it is hard to say if it is a FTR or not. See the second one. second FTR from the bottom touches the 1st FTR. Third FTR touches the second FTR. What is FTR? "Failure to Return". They have not failed to return!. So they are not FTRs. But 4th one.. It has not returned to the 3rd FTR. So it has failed to return to the previous one. It is...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Well that theory is certainly different from IF's first post of an FTR, as we clearly see it come back and touches the previous top. {image} Also, when we look closely..we may have missed out another important "kink" ..depending on what is to the left on this chart. So, that would make the 4th one not an FTR either by your definition. {image} I don't want to sound like I am just criticizing you. I am here to learn too. But, over a decade down the line..there is still much confusion on RTM methodology.....my own thought on FTR was a retrace...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi fdx, if I may continue your observatgions. Can we say (from bottom up) first is FL and second too because they kept price up?Ignored
Disliked{quote} No you are right. We should criticise if something is off from the original teaching. Your first image shows exactly what a FTR is. Red box is the FTR. You see the immediate low above the red box? It didn't retrace back to the red box. {image}Ignored