Menu
Sister Sites

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

Millionaire Run 3 replies

millionaire 3 replies

The quest to be a Millionaire 16 replies

Attachments: Millionaire Expert (save as EA)
Exit Attachments

Millionaire Expert (save as EA)

Quoting Macd-rsi
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mW8XmWlhd98 PHU SPECIAL LESSON PAINT YOUR DASHBOARD WITH YOUR PREFERED COLOURS
a very nice feature for color blind like me. thank you
THEORY: SL orders are always placed ABOVE the current pair's current price (opposite to BL orders that are placed BELOW the pair's current price) which is fine.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: audnzd-sl.jpg Size: 229 KB

I like to set pending SL orders (using SEND) BELOW the current pair's price as shown in the TESTER image. Is it possible?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: audnzd-sl2.jpg Size: 243 KB

To get this image, I dragged the current Ref_Price at 1.10213 to an arbitrary point at 1.07357 (new reference price).
I also dragged the Profit_Line to a new location at 1.08748, so that when price falls to this point the orders close.

QUESTION: What should I do to place orders using SEND based on my new Ref_Price (1.07357) and Profit_Line (1.08748) so that the result is SELL LIMIT orders all placed BELOW the current pair's price?

(O, D, TO, LD etc. will be set as shown- no questions here).
ZM
Common sense is not so common!
Quoting zippedmails
THEORY: SL orders are always placed ABOVE the current pair's current price (opposite to BL orders that are placed BELOW the pair's current price) which is fine. {image} I like to set pending SL orders (using SEND) BELOW the current pair's price as shown in the TESTER image. Is it possible? {image} To get this image, I dragged the current Ref_Price at 1.10213 to an arbitrary point at 1.07357 (new reference price). I also dragged the Profit_Line to a new location at 1.08748, so that when price falls to this point the orders close. QUESTION:...
SELL LIMIT orders all placed BELOW the current pair's price?--All orders will become market orders
Quoting Mt4canfx
{quote} SELL LIMIT orders all placed BELOW the current pair's price?--All orders will become market orders
Types of Forex Orders

this is covered in Pre School at babypips.com

If you chase two rabbits, you will catch neither one!
BRAIN.SURGERY Return This Year: 23.3%
Quoting Macd-rsi
are these videos useful?

I am also learning through the videos. Very usefull to me.

Thank you for your time recording them.

Can you direct me to where i can become your "buddy"?


cheers
Quoting Erebus
{quote} Types of Forex Orders this is covered in Pre School at babypips.com
i think his question is much deeper
Be yourself
Quoting zippedmails
THEORY: SL orders are always placed ABOVE the current pair's current price (opposite to BL orders that are placed BELOW the pair's current price) which is fine. {image} I like to set pending SL orders (using SEND) BELOW the current pair's price as shown in the TESTER image. Is it possible? {image} To get this image, I dragged the current Ref_Price at 1.10213 to an arbitrary point at 1.07357 (new reference price). I also dragged the Profit_Line to a new location at 1.08748, so that when price falls to this point the orders close. QUESTION:...
why not choose SS, SELL STOP
if you mean Q-orders or C-orders, moving white line is equivalent to conditional shift
Be yourself
Quoting phuclockbs
Dear Al-Otaibi, the display of MyEquityLevel is weird in my end {image}
true value is correct
just wrong format of broker number into xxx xxx xxx
space for each thousands decimals
Be yourself
Quoting Macd-rsi
{quote} why not choose SS, SELL STOP if you mean Q-orders or C-orders, moving white line is equivalent to conditional shift
Thank you Muhammad.
Basically, I am somewhat averse to SELL STOP and BUY STOP orders, and so I try to avoid them as far as possible.
Otherwise, SS orders is the right choice to go when price goes down below the market price.
(I was just curious to see if it is possible to 'cheat' a little with the EA and place SL instead of SS orders in the situation described)

As for Q-orders and C-orders, I think I need more demo practice to see how they work in the EA.
Could you kindly show how to set Q or C orders if I want to apply the situation illustrated in the TESTER?

...

@Erebus:
My question was addressed to Macd-rsi (Mr. 'Lightness'), NOT YOU (Mr. 'Darkness')!
Who asked for your opinion?
I was only curious to know if his EA code would allow such a 'hypothetical' situation?
So, there was no need for funny old guys like you to jump in to prove to everyone here that you have successfully passed 'Pre School at babypips.com'!
And, when was that by the way?? Just recently?
When do you want to grow up a little and stop prejudging or mocking others??!
Isn't it already too late for you Mr. Darkness?!

ZM
Common sense is not so common!
Dear Al-Otaibi,
Could you please add the Suspension option in the csv file of Autosave ?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 3333.jpg Size: 239 KB
Quoting phuclockbs
Dear Al-Otaibi, Could you please add the Suspension option in the csv file of Autosave ? {image}
What else?
Be yourself
Quote
Could you kindly show how to set Q or C orders if I want to apply the situation illustrated in the TESTER?
these orders were explained in detail month ago . .
there wil be a video on . .
for TESTER ... no changes . . .we keep it simpler since you have the control of REF PRICE . . there for either SL or SS or SLC or SLQ or SSQ or SSC ... are possible using TESTER ..
Be yourself
Quoting Macd-rsi
{quote} What else?
but in my opinion, its value in the original scv files is enough . .
so it is a type of a variable that we do not need to save ..

if it was YES in the original file ! do we have to repeat YES in the autosaved file //
??
Be yourself
Quoting Macd-rsi
{quote} but in my opinion, its value in the original scv files is enough . . so it is a type of a variable that we do not need to save .. if it was YES in the original file ! do we have to repeat YES in the autosaved file // ??
yes, we need it in the autosaved file, i think
because original file is for initial attaching but autosaved file is for resuming from the moment that we saved it
they are different, i think
necessity says: MIN_OFF_PIPS must be an array !! ?
Be yourself
Quoting Macd-rsi
{quote} What else?
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 5555.jpg Size: 39 KB
Quoting phuclockbs
{quote} {image}
corrected as a text
but the value in your mind itself is correct and exists in the expert memory . .

temprarily if you see for example 6 56 0
than mean 006 056 000 = 6056000
he remove left zeros

21596 (your picture)
Be yourself
Quoting Macd-rsi
{quote} corrected as a text but the value in your mind itself is correct and exists in the expert memory . . temprarily if you see for example 6 56 0 than mean 006 056 000 = 6056000 he remove left zeros 21596 (your picture)
i am talking about the autosaved file for FOR_ME system like yellow or white, outter or middle, delete chart or not ....
closed all and reset all over again by SEND 2hr42min ago
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: 4444.jpg Size: 211 KB

Thank you for all the benefits.
There is too much information and I don't know how to actually use it.
What will be the current standard operating procedure?
Do you manually close and reset when there is an increase in unrealized loss or do you keep it running all the time?
How do you handle settings such as stop loss and trailing stop?
Thank you.
2 traders viewing now