DislikedIf your strategy needs a risk of ruin of 100 trades, you should not be trading at all. It's flawed to use the same risk of $1 on a $100 and a $1250 account.Ignored
DislikedAlso, like I have mentioned several times you should have the same risk setting on the prop as on your own account. The source of funds should not make a difference. Would you trade your own 100k differently than a funded 100k? I would not.Ignored
DislikedIn any case, I recommend that you take another look at your numbers and compare for example a 100K funded account for which you paid for example $500 to trading the $500 as your own account.Ignored
Here is a model that I put together for MFF's instant funding model, that showcases the math a bit better (this does not compare against the challenge model because the results would be laughable):
I realize that the instant model that you are promoting is probably better than MFF's model, but no instant funding model can compete against a challenge model. And if you are producing 10% per month without issue, then you should have no problems with satisfying the requirements for that.
1