Two-day detailed report
2
Trying scalping with a 1000 bucks - Scalping is expensive! 39 replies
strategy builder/tester for new scalping strategy 1 reply
1M & 5M Scalping System (Scalping Paradise) 21 replies
Reversals vs. CounterTrend Trade 28 replies
CounterTrend Trading 58 replies
DislikedHi guys, I was watching m5, maybe better than m1, I am wondering how many times the price hit ema9 actually, but need clear evidence first, like here, I’ve got a very small profit and could have entered more times when the price goes up, but ema9 behave like a magnet, {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thats right. I havent made 1 single trade today. Nothing fitted my critera. up 14% for the monthIgnored
Disliked{quote} Be welcome my friend Magiruss! I must say 2% Max DD and PF of 8 is very impressive and promising! However the sample is a bit too small to consider it to be fully representative of the strategy. By adding more setups and scenarios the PF should decrease and the Max DD should increase! But it really doesn't matter as long as our equity is moving in the right direction over the long termThanks for sharing! {quote} Hi Chali86! Most of the times the 9 EMA is too close to be used as target in my opinion. I have seen KoF using it when...
Ignored
Disliked{quote} Dear Abade, backtesting looks promising,just need to consider when ema fan is wide and price to be away from ema9,not to get destroyed buy strong trend like on this screenshoot AU,today sell gu was perfect, light blue is ema1 {image} {image} {image} {image} {image} {image} {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} That's right my friend! Those seemingly endless trends is why I don't trust the AUD pairs or metals for countertrend trading, even the all mighty KoF is trapped inside those now and then for not picking the low fruits that GU give instead during the same time-lapseAre you using the EMA 1 for support and resistance or to trigger entries? Thanks for sharing.
Ignored
Disliked{quote} Looking alone M1 is not clever. It is more dangerous using M1 alone and trade high position sizes. What if you have heavy momentum above several timeframe and build positions in the smaller timeframe? I have managed to trade that way. A new trend is starting with a so called countertrade on the smallest timeframe.Ignored
Disliked{quote} That's right my friend! Those seemingly endless trends is why I don't trust the AUD pairs or metals for countertrend trading, even the all mighty KoF is trapped inside those now and then for not picking the low fruits that GU give instead during the same time-lapseAre you using the EMA 1 for support and resistance or to trigger entries? Thanks for sharing.
Ignored
Disliked{quote} Looking alone M1 is not clever. It is more dangerous using M1 alone and trade high position sizes. What if you have heavy momentum above several timeframe and build positions in the smaller timeframe? I have managed to trade that way. A new trend is starting with a so called countertrade on the smallest timeframe.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Mostlly for triggering ,for long time playing with M1 to be honest, you know that great trader Parisboy ,on another thread, using FLD's also very successful,ma1 shifted 16,32 and 64 points in time and using those for SR...You can take a look... What I found on m1 is LMA shifted 16 points in time make this pattern over and over ,see screenshoot,blue one is lma1 ,but this one is danger also,because as usual after the event all is clear,one can trade after price cross shifted ma.... {image}
Ignored
Disliked{quote} This is a strong move/breakout in the D1 (daily) EURUSD chart: {image} This is the start of that breakout in a lower timeframe: {image} Does it look unmanageable? Not by a long shot. This is the next day (24) in the lower timeframe, the breakout in the daily is still developing with a small pullback: {image} The next day (25) the market keeps moving in the breakout direction and we got this: {image} Still manageable, lots of 20, 50 and 200 EMA touches. If you know a better example of a higher timeframe move that would become unmanageable...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I trade sort of like a grid. Add another position every -10 - 20 -30 etc max 10 positions. On the hope price retreats. I will exit either - 1 position or B/E or even + 1 you need to exept that your not going to hit it everytime and you need a management strategy. Because heavily positioned and hit a trend you could be in trouble. You want longevityIgnored
Disliked{quote} RieseP, Mark Douglas is one of the classics, and of course that I have read his book (I have a psychology degree myself as well)And of course that longevity should be the main focus of every trader and there is no such thing as 100% accuracy, I never implied otherwise. What I was trying to demonstrate with that example is that a higher timeframe breakout or trend does not imply that the lower timeframe becomes unmanageable by default.
Ignored
Disliked{quote} This is a strong move/breakout in the D1 (daily) EURUSD chart: {image} This is the start of that breakout in a lower timeframe: {image} Does it look unmanageable? Not by a long shot. This is the next day (24) in the lower timeframe, the breakout in the daily is still developing with a small pullback: {image} The next day (25) the market keeps moving in the breakout direction and we got this: {image} Still manageable, lots of 20, 50 and 200 EMA touches. If you know a better example of a higher timeframe move that would become unmanageable...Ignored
Disliked{quote} First I watch the daily and if I am on a strong move. Is the previous candle without suitable wicks? If so I wait further for candles building wicks, good if it on both sides. What are the place I watch that? I use as simple filter the ema 5 and 20. If price is not over or under both, I do not trade it. I watch for the same on H4, M30 and M5. If over all time frames we are complete above or under Ema 5 and 20? I will wait for my entry. I reenter if price manage to go against my position with the Ema 10. I compound my trade ffast if I am...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thanks my friend! I have already tested and compared to ICM, which has slighly lower spreads in GBPUSD (as low as 0.6 to 0.8 for standard accounts), however the spread (bid/ask lines) is not showing correctly in the chart and makes scalping a bit hard/weird in their MT4/MT5 platform (they show you the lower bid/ask of a commision account instead of the "real" wider one of a standard account). I have tried to explain that to tech support but they are completely clueless. Not an issue in the higher timeframes thank god as it's just a 3 point...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Why would you use a standard account when the expenses (commission) for EU/GU and UJ are about $ 5.50 (round trip - 1 Lot) with a spread of practically 0. Then you have no commission on CFD's although apart from the higher spread they "tweak" their profits manipulating the tick value at their convenience...Ignored