@parisboy -- I have a question / comment about the backshifting that I hope you can address. I'm about to make a controversial statement: There is no reason for CMA 16 to be backshifted by 8. The backshifting should go like this:
CMA 16: Backshift = 0
CMA 32: Backshift = -8 (-32/2 + 8)
CMA 64: Backshift = -24 (-64/2 + 8)
CMA 128 Backshift = -56 (-128/2 + 8)
CMA 256 Backshift = -120 (-256/2 + 8)
That initial backshift of 8 introduces a lag of 8 that serves no purpose. Using the backshifts I listed above would yield the exact same results with the benefit of CMA 16 not being backshifted.
@parisboy -- do you know what I mean?
CMA 16: Backshift = 0
CMA 32: Backshift = -8 (-32/2 + 8)
CMA 64: Backshift = -24 (-64/2 + 8)
CMA 128 Backshift = -56 (-128/2 + 8)
CMA 256 Backshift = -120 (-256/2 + 8)
That initial backshift of 8 introduces a lag of 8 that serves no purpose. Using the backshifts I listed above would yield the exact same results with the benefit of CMA 16 not being backshifted.
@parisboy -- do you know what I mean?
1