OK. So pretty much everyone knows that "Every Tick" testing is more preferred and for the most part more accurate than "Control Points" testing. And most everyone has experienced that most EAs that test very well on "Control Points" do awfully when run on run on "Every Tick".
I just experienced for the first time in several years, an EA with a particular setting that tested well on "Every Tick" but horribly on "Control Points". It's very unusual I think.
Has anyone experience this often? If so, is there any reason why it would do so well on "Every Tick" and poorly on "Control Point" instead of the usual "looks great on Control Point and not so great on ET? Or, is this just a super random thing?
I just experienced for the first time in several years, an EA with a particular setting that tested well on "Every Tick" but horribly on "Control Points". It's very unusual I think.
Has anyone experience this often? If so, is there any reason why it would do so well on "Every Tick" and poorly on "Control Point" instead of the usual "looks great on Control Point and not so great on ET? Or, is this just a super random thing?
