Disliked{quote} you just talking like guru who neglects his own logic. when you state "past means nothing" then why build EA which calculates past data to get probabilities? why publish results if past is done and gone and means nothing? see that was illogical and that I pointed out regarding your EA results - indeed looks good 0.56 lots for 200usd account might be too much but ok SL is 5 pips, so the risk for 1 deal is 13% of the account here. Then I see when smaller lots size then SL in pips more - for example 12 pips. Good...Ignored
1. First of all, I don't use past data to calculate probabilities.
2. If I don't post the past how would someone wanting to put an input see if the idea works or not? You just can't accept it that I don't use historical charts Don't you? And it's okay, it's hard to impossible to unlearn something.
3. Your math is probably wrong, the worse ever Risk this EA will ever take or took is less that 6%. Again, what are pips? How do those help one to be profitable????? I don't care about pips, they don't matter, I don't calculate pips. I take risk, I calculate how much risk and that is all. Of 100 lots will results in a 5% risk trade, then 100 lots will be traded.
4. That 56 lot trade was a bug, I even enquiry about it on mql5. If you'd care to notice, it's 2x risk, meaning it's 10% and bug was fixed. If you can check my timeline on mql5, I did address the but and it affected December's results. Notice how the trade was done seconds after the entry? That's a bug. EA takes time to calculate. It's impossible for trades to be that close.
Martingale is a gambling strategy that requires infinite amount of money. It's stupid.