Closing price or minimum of the previous candle?

Well,

that's my first topic here at FF. I'd like to start with a subject that seems very simple, but it's not. I participate in a group of friends who discussed some subject at the end of the week. And the subject that we can't close in a consensus is: Let's put a sale as an example. Analyzing a possible sale, the order would be issued when it lost the closing or minimum of the previous candle?

Having both relevant prices and that there was stop.

I know some might say, you need to look at the context. But this debate is very clear. Issue order in overcoming the locks or maximas and minimas?

The intention of the topic is to resolve this existing doubt among many traders.

I hope we can come up with a result accepted by the majority.

As you cant execute a trade at the close of the bar, as by definitionthe bar is closed and so we have moved to the next bar, I would wait for the open of a new bar to make my decision and trade then.

Therefore, you open an order on the candlestick's close. Could you justify your answer?

Point 1.

Colleagues,

I'm sorry. I think it's misexplained. We have two price stops.

The maximum price and closing price. Let's just say another candle will appear in a moment. What is the most relevant price?

The closing price or minimum price? Which would be right to market. At loss of lock or minima?

The close is more important