Writing it down gets it out of my head...

If you want real US election info you'll find it on TheGatewayPundit dotcom
Pretty amazing what's going on...there are pages and pages of breaking stories.

If you're interested in how your elections are staged all over the world, here's a 45 min video of how the software works:
https://globalintelhub.com/large-sca...idential-race/

Very interesting thread..

The Global Reset you've been calling for and backing for all these months is NOT going to reset the way your masters want it to.

It's turning out to be a GLOBAL REAWAKENING.

The March 3 date of the signed agreement in the lawsuit referred to in the article link below establishes the conspiracy to use the China virus was put together PRIOR to the virus getting bad and PRIOR to the lockdowns happening. (if it was signed on March 3 then the negotiation for this illegal agreement likely started in February. It's an illegal agreement because the Constitution states that only the state legislatures may make the voting rules, not the secretary of state or anyone else.)

The fact that Hillary Clinton's attorney negotiated an agreement with the Georgia Secretary of State to change how absentee ballots are supposed to be processed shows a plan was in place sometime in February, if not months prior to the virus being loosed on the world, for the virus to be used as a tool, a reason, to lockdown the country and the lockdown to be used as an excuse for use of absentee ballots, and the absentee ballots to be processed in illegal ways and, therefore, this shows the plan was in place to steal the election.

So, we now know the china virus was used waaaaay in advance as an excuse, a plan, to steal the election.

This establishes conspiracy to commit treason by the globalist elites, the democrat party, the media, social media, the deep state, etc, etc, etc.

Here's the link: https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...ey-marc-elias/

it's pretty obvious some people only post what the media tells them is going on. they repeat the media word for word. post the exact same ideas.
if a person is going to survive in trading it can only be done by doing our due diligence, doing our research, digging into things and verifying thing for ourselves.
Remember when you were a newbie trader and you listened to another trader's hot tip and traded it? Sure, it may have worked once or twice but it didn't turn out too well in the long run did it? Yep, you understand what i'm saying. and we both know this applies to more than just trading. It applies to everything in life. do your research. dig in. get underneath what you're being told. find the truth for yourself.

Proof of conspiracy to steal the election: Per a lawsuit filed in Georgia (by covington catholic sandman's attorney), it appears the Georgia rino marxist secretary of state signed a secret deal with hillary clinton's attorney to change how absentee ballots would be processed in the state. this was signed on March 3 so it would have likely been in the negotiation stage in February or even before that time. This was an illegal agreement because the US Constitution specifically states that the state legislatures are in charge of establishing the rules and processes for voting. This means a state secretary of state can NOT make any rules or agreements contrary to the legislature's.

in my opinion, the March 3 date of the signed agreement establishes that the conspiracy to use the virus to steal the election was put together PRIOR to the virus getting bad and PRIOR to the lockdowns happening. In fact, pelosi was in san francisco's chinatown making light of the china virus on Feb 24 and on March 30 deblasio was still downplaying the virus in nyc.

This suggests the D's had a plan in place for the virus to be used as a tool to induce lock downs in the future; meaning the lockdowns had not already begun prior to the signature on March 3. in fact, the first lockdown did not start until March 19 and was in California while Georgia did not lock down until April 3.

This also shows there was a plan in place to use the conspired and planned upcoming lock downs as the excuse to induce the use of mass absentee ballots months before there could have even been a perceived need for them.

These two things together show the plan was in place to steal the election sometime in February or even before that.

So, we now know the china virus was used waaaaay in advance to commit treason by conspiring to steal the election.

Let's go one step further: Based on this information, in my opinion, it may now be possible to show the virus was put out on purpose by china/un/who/etc with the above intent. Discovery during this lawsuit could be used to prove this. So, watch for there to be an out of court settlement of this case so there is no proof China/Who/UN/whomever else conspired to release the virus allowed to come to light.

This is one hell of a movie we are all living in...it's got everything! I am 85% confident in a good ending....

If Trump losses trading is over because:
- there will be one currency...can't trade if there is only one currency
- commodities will be owned by the state so nothing to trade
- there will be no stocks because all businesses will be owned by the state
- there will be one crypto currency allowed and it will be owned by the state...all others shut down and funds lost
It's called the 'Great Reset' where only a few elites will rule:
Written by John Binder19 Nov 2020338
4:24
Global political elites like European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and former Secretary of State John Kerry view Democrat Joe Biden as a driver of World Economic Forum’s “The Great Reset” mission that seeks major transformation of the world’s economy.
In a panel discussion by the World Economic Forum, Kerry said Biden is ready to rejoin the Paris Climate Agreement — which threatens to eliminate more than a million American jobs — and be a driver of the”Great Reset” whereby unelected global bureaucrats are looking to alter the world’s economy by abolishing money, private property, and democracy for the sake of a “New World Order,” according to James Delingpole.
“The notion of a reset is more important than ever before,” Kerry said. “I personally believe … we’re at the dawn of an extremely exciting time.”
Kerry said the U.S. rejoining the job-killing, industry-gutting Parish Climate Agreement is “not enough.”
“I know Joe Biden believes this. It’s not enough just to rejoin [the Paris Climate Agreement] for the United States. It’s not enough for us to do just the minimum of what [the agreement] requires,” Kerry said. He went on:
The Biden administration will focus on every sector of the American economy. There will be a 2035 goal to achieve net neutrality with respect to power and production … we’re ready to come back in and help to lead and raise the ambition in Glasgow to accelerate this incredible capacity for a transformation in the private sector.
Von der Leyen said the European Commission looks forward to Biden rejoining the U.S. to the Paris Climate Agreement, calling the former vice president “President-Elect” and a “friend in the White House.”
Part of this new cooperation between a Biden White House and the European Commission, according to von der Leyen, includes writing “a new rulebook for the digital economy and the digital society.” She said:
So, covering everything from data to infrastructure, but also talking about security and democracy, technology to fair taxation — all of these are topics are on the table with digital change. So ladies and gentlemen, the need for global cooperation and this acceleration of change will both be drivers of the Great Reset. And I see this as an unprecedented opportunity.
It’s good to have a friend in the White House. We should not forget what kind of strength we can develop … we need a new agenda and of course, we will have to start with the most pressing issue which is COVID-19 … the second big topic is climate change, fighting climate change … the third topic is the tech topic.
Biden already adopted the World Economic Forum’s “Build Back Better” slogan used for the Great Reset by using the phrase on the campaign trail this year.
Kerry also admitted that the rise of the nationalist-populist movement around the world is “a reflection of the inability of democratic governments in many parts of the world to deliver” on issues facing their citizens.
“What astounds me is that as many people still voted for the level of chaos and breach of law and order and breaking the standards and … I think that, the underlying reason for that is something that everybody has to examine,” Kerry said of the more than 71 million Americans who voted for Trump in the November 3 presidential election.
“I think Europe has to look at that with Brexit and the rising national populism — nationalistic populism. Which is really one of the priorities that we all have to address. You can’t dismiss it,” Kerry said.
The establishment media will play a role in the Great Reset, the World Economic Forum suggests. New York Times columnist Ben Smith said the media sees themselves as rule-makers where they set the national agenda — not Americans.
“I think in this election you saw major media outlets just much more careful about picking up, for instance, these stories about Hunter Biden just because they were on the internet in a way that Wikileaks came to dominate the campaign last cycle,” Smith said.
“I think that you’re seeing the mainstream media institutions become a bit more confident in trying to set the national agenda, trying to establish priorities that they think are the priorities rather than simply reacting to what’s happening on social media,” Smith continued.

We're using Ivermectin as a preventative.

India and Bangladesh as well as countries in Africa and South America have literally shipped it to their residents for free. They did this for less than $3 a dose. Their statistics have improved dramatically.

What made me decide to use it was reading a research paper where Argentina had 1400 front line medical people in a four month study. 700 took Ivermectin and 700 did not. ZERO of the 700 who took it got sick. 56% of the people who didn't take it became ill.

It was discovered that it would work for the china virus at a nursing home in Canada by accident. A few residents on the fourth floor had scabbies (a parasite that gets under the skin and spreads to other people quickly). So they treated all the residents on that floor with 12mg of ivermectin, but not the workers. Four tiny pills. Then around 2 weeks later the china virus hit the nursing home. People were getting sick on other floors, but not on the fourth floor. They figured out that Ivermectin was the reason. So, they gave it to everyone, including the sick people. One person who was already having problems with dehydration before the china virus hit went to the hospital. NO ONE else went to the hospital or died!

An older woman in Buffalo NY was in the ICU and intubated/ventilator. The family worked very hard and persuaded one of the ICU doctors to give her Ivermectin. She was off the ventilator in 48 hours and left the hospital soon after. https://buffalonews.com/news/local/a...541448755.html

The list goes on and on...

The virus protocol is here: https://covid19criticalcare.com/

Gold trade and the trading process:

Here's the result of the low risk, high potential reward trade posted earlier along with some of my process written on the chart.

Enjoy your weekend.

Gold trade still going.
The above post shows the entry within a few minutes of opening the trade.
And the second picture above shows the first 1/2 of the trade closed at 1% take profit and some of my process.
This post shows the second close for another 1%. This was 1/4 of the original trade and it went 2x as far as where the first 1/2 closed.

Still have 1/4 of the original trade on and the stop isn't quite at break even. It's hopefully safe below the demand box a little bit.
Develop your trading system from things you understand and "see". Add risk management and trade management and you have your trading process. Tweak it until it's profitable and consistent for you.
Do your trading process over and over.

Other than the technical trading reasons for my entry last night there was a fundamental/news reason: The US House passed the $1.9 trillion stimulus and the Senate had started debate about 3 hours before my trade. Gold has gone up strongly after each of the previous US stimulus packages were passed. If price is oversold or overbought on a large timeframe then news is likely to reverse it. We'll see if that happens next week when the US senate announcing the continued theft of taxpayer money for their donors/friends and poorly managed cities and states.

Gold trade still long. The last 1/4 of my original trade is still open. The US Senate passed the fake china virus stimulus so my guess is there will be a gap up at the open. It's rare that I leave a trade on over the weekend and isn't the smartest thing a person can do. However, the first 3/4 of the trade is closed with a 2% profit: I took 2% risk with a $7.12 stop loss. When it went up $7.12 to match my stop loss i closed half for a 1% gain. When it went up another $7.12 (total of $14.24) I closed 1/4 of the original trade (half of the remaining trade) for another 1% gain.
So, if the market gaps down past my stop it would need to gap down quite a bit (nope, I'm not doing the math to figure out the exact number) for that remaining 1/4 of the original trade to lose my 2% booked profit from the trade. We'll see what happens at the open.

The remaining part of the gold trade from Friday into Sunday hit 3x, but I didn't close it. And, yes, I should have. I am learning more of how the market makers move the markets and that sometimes when a large long term reversal may be in the cards, I need to slow down and stay one step behind them instead of in front of them. Trade what you see, not what you think...then you'll end up trading what you think. It seems a lot of commercial and prop traders had also loaded up for gold so the mm's went hunting for stops for an extra day prior to finally what appears to be a turn bullish on Gold this week.

Always learning. Always getting better.

scalping trading done right...

first pic is a 1 minute chart trade for eur/usd short based on price hitting supply on the higher time frames. just a quick counter trend scalp for 9.5 pips. 1.25% using 2% risk. I cut the trade off because it stalled at the 5 minute bollinger band middle line...being a counter trend trade i didn't take any chances with it.

second pic is a 1 min chart trade for gold short; again, based onhigher time frame supply. locked in profit on the first two out of three parts of the trade and then pulled stop to break even. last lots stopped out coming into news at break even. $2.27 move and $3.29 move. about 2.5%

third pic is news trade i did NOT take - can one predict the direction of the market 1 minute before the news? don't blame me for losing $ after taking a news trade!

Going to go get some sleep...

Every great swing trade begins with a good scalp trade.

Moving stops to b/e isn't always the best idea!

So, I was tired and just wanted to go to sleep. That was my first problem...trading tired. It's usually that way by 4am on a Friday morning! And, if you've read my thread you'll know I'm haunted by Fridays. I tend to trade scared and want to lock all the profits in and quit for the week on a positive note.

I called the trade in picture 1 in the trade room: "GBP/USD short."
The pair literally jumped up a pip or so when I was entering the shorts so I ended up with a very small 7 pip stop loss. This means my first close for 1x my stop loss happened quickly. I risk 2% and that closed half the trade for a quick 1% profit which would cover my remaining 1% stop loss for a break even trade if my stop was hit.

Picture 2: Then the pair hit my second take profit where half of the remaining lots (1/4 of the original trade) closed for another 1% take profit. (1/4 of the trade equals one half of one percent risk and it closed at 2x the stop loss = 1% profit.)

At that point my process requires the stop loss to be pulled to break even + 1 pip (b/e+1).

However, I noted in the trade room that I really wanted to move my stop loss back to the original area. Why? Because there was a very solid higher timeframe down trendline right across the top of my 1 minute supply box and price was around the .50 area and it was the right time of the trading session for a trade like this to continue short with some volume.

But I didn't do it! Ugh, I went back and thought this through: there was only 1/4 of the original trade left and the trade cycle had already locked in 2% of the trade so losing this trade would have lost me half of a percent. Now isn't it worth risking losing a quarter (half a percent of the account) of the 2% you just made in exchange for gaining a few percent? YES! YES! YES! But no, I needed to go to bed...and for some unknown reason (okay, we know the reason...Friday!) my fogged brain couldn't see the math and couldn't comprehend that I use stops and take profits so I didn't need to be awake for any of this to happen! Hello!

Suffice it to say, the G/U moved down 120+ pips on a 7 pip stop loss = 17x my stop!!! So, it moved over 4%. Who in their right mind, not their Friday mind, wouldn't be willing to risk 1/2 a percent to get over 4%?

So, sometimes we have to not just see the fact that you're in a great trade, we have to act on it and either not change the stop to b/e+1 or we have to be willing to put it back to the original stop area.

The stop shouldn't be moved until price has moved a minimum of x pips from the entry. My stops are normally 12-15 pips and the stop this time was 7. So, I will wait until price has had a chance to move away further than 2x the stop if the stop is less than 12 pips before moving the stop. I could probably then just make the rule that the stop isn't moved to b/e+1 until price has moved 24 pips. I will monitor this.

Is Pfizer vaccine a fraud?

Some interesting statistics I've been studying regarding covid19 and the Ivermectin my family has been taking for the last few months as a preventative:

We've been taking it now for a few months and have had zero side effects other than being free to move around and do whatever we want without worry.

Here are some stats that I just wrote about for an on-line blog that should be considered:

Everyone seems to skip over the concept that a high percentage of people will NOT get "the flu" to begin with. Other than HCQ working if started immediately upon having flu-like symptoms, take the 3-month study on Ivermectin in Argentina for example: 58% of the front-line healthcare workers who did NOT take Ivermectin got "the flu". Um, hello, that means 42% did NOT get "the flu".

Of course, everyone also overlooks the fact that ZERO of the front-line healthcare workers who took Ivermectin over the 3-month trial ended up with "the flu". ZERO who took Ivermectin as a preventative got ANY type of flu.

So, does this mean the 42% who didn't get "the flu" already had immunity to "the flu"? Or does this mean that +/- 92% of "covid19" cases were false positives due to the WHO telling people to do the PCR test magnification at 38-40x instead of at the correct magnification?

And, does this mean that the Pfizer vaccine is worthless because it only "protects" around 93% of people from getting covid19...the same % of false positives?

The Argentina trial I'm referring to is called IVECAR trial. Feel free to discover the info for yourself by doing a duck duck go search for the term: IVECAR trial Argentina.

Yep, +/- 93% of the 'covid19' cases are the regular seasonal flu. In other words, false positives due to the CDC/WHO forcing people to over magnify the PCR tests...they admitted to this "testing error" a couple months ago...you know, AFTER the election.

Think about this...the Pfizer vaccine only works for around 93% of people who take it.

hmm, that might mean it doesn't work at all for covid19.

So, is the Pfizer vaccine a fraud?