Disliked{quote} Yes, however, even if you choose 5 days but the red dotted line only reaches on the past 3rd day (only reads 3 days of tick data), the volume profile is incomplete.Ignored
1
Point to Point a.k.a. Deterministic Trading with Orbit the Tool 103 replies
Dow futures point to more than a 1,000-point fall at the open 1 reply
Point and figure charts 7 replies
Pivot point reference point? 7 replies
Disliked{quote} Yes, however, even if you choose 5 days but the red dotted line only reaches on the past 3rd day (only reads 3 days of tick data), the volume profile is incomplete.Ignored
Disliked{quote} The most important thing is the red dotted line. The indicator can only read as far as the red dotted line.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Correct, When you said you keep dragging it i thought it was annoying you lol, but you like to drag depending on chart then I am just lazyIgnored
Disliked{quote} Very nice and easy understandable! Do you search only buys today in UC or is there a possible situation for sell?Ignored
DislikedUC yesterday trend day today range day, easy trading UC m 15 without anything where was bought {image} {image}Ignored
Dislikedm5 GN on my games chart (footprint) to see big big buyers GBP is in demand today {image}Ignored
Disliked{quote} If you use 1 minute, go to M1 chart and drag the chart backwards because the indicator does not automatically read past ticks. If you use 5 minutes, go to m5 and drag again, etc. The red dotted line shows the limit of ticks the indicator can read, just drag more if you want more data.Ignored
DislikedGood work. The market profile is an average system and not trustworthy. I actually tried this system some time in October, not yours but the market profile concept. My experience with the market profile is its susceptible to news, market session, market status. Its profitable in some conditions but risky in others. It does well with some pairs but poor with others. When you adjust your indicator to look back in order to set the the point of control to shown by the red line isn't that highly subjective and contradicting your earlier statement where...Ignored