Sorry to interrupt the dick talk....
This is obviously a Rubiks cube.
If someone tossed you one of these, you might grab it and play with it for a while.
Chances are, you'll mess it up and put it down after a while.
Some who have practiced playing with it a lot might actually solve it in record time.
Hedging is nowhere near as complicated as solving a Rubiks cube. It is hundreds of times easier.
I have never successfully solved a messed up cube but I have slightly messed up a brand new one and then retraced my steps backwards and fixed it.
I know it can be done. I just don't have the patience for it. Besides, it doesn't pay me cash if I actually put time and effort into it.
People who demand answers to how something is done in Forex are impatient like I am with the cube.
One of the quickest ways to cut through the bs to get at the answer is to claim it is not solvable or doable. That makes you look like a liar if
you don't prove that you are not lying. Tell me how it's done or you are a liar. Deliver the goods now cause I have no time for your lies.
MZ was quick to reply with his details of how he hedges. I personally don't do things his way. That shows you that there are different ways or reasons to hedge. RickM also showed his method. Either members could have opened threads on how to hedge and explain in detail with charts and examples if they wanted to teach hedging but instead, they explained their ways due to pressure. The pressure that they weren't lying and pretending to have something good going. Very nice of them BTW to explain how. Did anyone thank them?
If I was really looking for hedging techniques, I would have cherished their answers and I would have tested something like they do in a demo and if hit a wall, maybe I would ask these fellows how to deal with the situation.
LDFX is not interested in finding answers. He knows only how to speculate if a pair is going up or down, bet on it and take a SL way out if his speculation fails. TP is based on a rigid 1:3 RR for him and that's it. With that LDFX is the king of Forex. He makes I donno...something like 60% in 1.5 years if I remember correctly based on an old demo he has and believes nothing else beats his system.
I know it sounds like I am talking in his absence behind his back but I know he will read this and we have extensively discussed these things in another thread and also in PM's. That's why I do not believe his questions are sincere and I believe his aim is to quash any other creative method of trading than the old speculation and SL based on a mechanical 1:3 RR. For more info on that method please visit Babypips.
Point is, if you wonder how a Rubiks cube works, grab one and try it. No point hearing me telling you to twist the top row to the left and then turn it 180 degrees and twist the now top row to the right and so on.
Get that LDFX?
This is obviously a Rubiks cube.
If someone tossed you one of these, you might grab it and play with it for a while.
Chances are, you'll mess it up and put it down after a while.
Some who have practiced playing with it a lot might actually solve it in record time.
Hedging is nowhere near as complicated as solving a Rubiks cube. It is hundreds of times easier.
I have never successfully solved a messed up cube but I have slightly messed up a brand new one and then retraced my steps backwards and fixed it.
I know it can be done. I just don't have the patience for it. Besides, it doesn't pay me cash if I actually put time and effort into it.
People who demand answers to how something is done in Forex are impatient like I am with the cube.
One of the quickest ways to cut through the bs to get at the answer is to claim it is not solvable or doable. That makes you look like a liar if
you don't prove that you are not lying. Tell me how it's done or you are a liar. Deliver the goods now cause I have no time for your lies.
MZ was quick to reply with his details of how he hedges. I personally don't do things his way. That shows you that there are different ways or reasons to hedge. RickM also showed his method. Either members could have opened threads on how to hedge and explain in detail with charts and examples if they wanted to teach hedging but instead, they explained their ways due to pressure. The pressure that they weren't lying and pretending to have something good going. Very nice of them BTW to explain how. Did anyone thank them?
If I was really looking for hedging techniques, I would have cherished their answers and I would have tested something like they do in a demo and if hit a wall, maybe I would ask these fellows how to deal with the situation.
LDFX is not interested in finding answers. He knows only how to speculate if a pair is going up or down, bet on it and take a SL way out if his speculation fails. TP is based on a rigid 1:3 RR for him and that's it. With that LDFX is the king of Forex. He makes I donno...something like 60% in 1.5 years if I remember correctly based on an old demo he has and believes nothing else beats his system.
I know it sounds like I am talking in his absence behind his back but I know he will read this and we have extensively discussed these things in another thread and also in PM's. That's why I do not believe his questions are sincere and I believe his aim is to quash any other creative method of trading than the old speculation and SL based on a mechanical 1:3 RR. For more info on that method please visit Babypips.
Point is, if you wonder how a Rubiks cube works, grab one and try it. No point hearing me telling you to twist the top row to the left and then turn it 180 degrees and twist the now top row to the right and so on.
Get that LDFX?
Attached Image
3
️
