Planetary Cycles Trading (EUR/USD)

This Mars sextile Ouranus on Mo. 2:49 EASTDT marked quite a reversal [LOW]......

Today Tue. plenty of events....Merc. trine Jup. 8:29 ---Merc. opp.Neptune 12:07 --- Mars conj. Pluto 14:08

All HELIO.....

what;s your interpretation for risk assets: EURCHF, S&P500, EURUSD? USDCNH? Cheers friend..

I'm concerned about ERIS square pluto and saturn...

Man, hi.

I follow DOW and Euro usually.
Euro, I had a bearish anticipation which evaporated...by PA.......

DOW , I believe it has room to move up a few more days till 3 June + or- ...... Then collapse.

ERIS , I don't follow......

Regards.

10:55 EST E=1.09 85 after a top at 1.10 31..... wavewise looks like a top in my eyes....

TTTTA LBf - KeepItSimple
update from last year

Mario of 4X other way has posted a new video on how to use the Moon Sidereal and Synodic cycles in MT4 using the Fibonacci Time tool... well worth watching.

Oh wow, 5 years ago... I haven't used it to say how it works out in the long run. The gravitational pull of the Moon is linked to the Synodic Cycle though. My main, go to Astro setting these days in Timing Solution is the Moon-Sun which is the Synodic Cycle. So it is well worth looking into with lots of back testing.

do you still stand behind your forecast of a cit tomorrow into Friday?

Par = paralel
C.p = contra paralel

Paralel = same declination
contra paralel = opposition declination

Valency of Conjunction
show relationship conjunt aspect only,
the idea if we see many conjunct benefic planet,
instrument is assumed upturn.
example: sameday we have mer0°jup,ven0°nep,sun0°ura.
based on theory, stock will upturn.
And Conversely. As the complexity.

but there's no guarantee.

36 Planetary Combinations and 5 Aspects

Bradley would then consider every relation that these nine planets were forming with each other - yielding a total of 36 (8 + 7 + 6 + 5 + 4 + 3 + 2 +1 =36) planetary combinations.
What is a relation between two planets ? In astronomy and astrology the planets are mapped on a circle of 360 degrees. If you divide this circle into equal parts you get harmonic divisions. I.e. a division of 4 yields 90 (360/4) degrees, a division of 3 yields 120 (360/3) degrees. Thus if two planets are either 90 or 120 degrees apart, they form a relation with each other. In astrology these relations are called "aspects".
Bradley employed the circle divisions of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 6 for his formula, leading to aspects of 360, 180, 120, 90 and 60 degrees respectively. Bradley did not include the division of 5 in his formula since the result 72 (360/5) is not a multiple of 10. In fact by choosing only these 5 aspects Bradley was in good company.
Already in the years 100 - 178 AD, Claudius Ptolomaeus of Alexandria was the foremost and respected astronomer of his time. He wrote a famous book called "Tetrabiblos" in which he summarized the astrological findings of the old Chaldeans and stated the importance of these five aspects. So it happened that up to this date - the five aspects that Bradley used in his formula - are known as the "Ptolemy" aspects.

Weighing 180 events as positive or negative

Combining 36 combinations with 5 aspects yields a total of 180 (5*36) planetary events that comprise the Bradley formula. For each of these Bradley would use a wide orb of 15 degrees, but he would assign the greatest weights to those planetary pairs that were making exact aspects to each other.
Simply spoken, if there are many planets making exact aspects at the same time - the Bradley Indicator will reach a peak and a turning point in the stock market is indicated.
This is however not exactly true. Building on the theory of the musical scale and on the old astrological scriptures of Ptolomaeus and other famous astrologers, Bradley would classify some aspects as positive and other aspects as negative. All 60 and 120 aspects received positive weights and all 90 and 180 aspects received negative weights. Concerning the remaining 36 conjunctions Bradley classified each of them individually as either positive or negative. All conjunctions formed by Mars and Saturn received negative weights, because Mars and Saturn were traditionally considered the malefic planets according to the ancient scriptures. Most of the conjunctions of Venus and Jupiter received positive weights since these two planets were the traditional beneficiaries. The remaining conjunctions Bradley rated as either positive or negative according to his testing of the stock market at that time.

Rising to Fame

By constantly weighing 182 (Bradley also added the declinations of Venus and Mars into his final formula) planetary combinations in that manner Bradley hoped that his Siderograph would turn positive as stock prices rise and turn negative as stock prices fall. After more than 50 years of data we know that his happened some of the time, but not most of the time. However the turns indicated in the Bradley formula have coincided with stock market turns in such a regular fashion and with such an amazing accuracy that the Bradley indicator has reached fame and widespread acclaim beyond the narrow borders of financial astrology.

THE BRADLEY IS A MEASURE OF PLANETARY GEOMETRY

Why does the Bradley work ? Because it is a mathematical and hence objective measure of planetary geometry. Let me explain this. The Bradley will reach a turning point if many of the 180 planetary aspects are becoming exact at the same time. I have convinced myself that neutralizing the effects of the Venus and Mars declinations will NOT change the turning points in the Bradley formula, although this will alter the SHAPE of the Siderograph.
Strictly spoken the Bradley will reach a high if many trines (120) and sextiles (60) and some conjunctions (0) become exact at the same time and will reach a low if many oppositions (180) and squares (90) and some conjunctions become exact at the same time. However many aspects becoming exact at the same time will always tend to create a special form of planetary geometry. And that is why the Bradley indicator is a mathematical measure of planetary geometry and the success of the Bradley proves that planetary geometry works in forecasting turns in the stock market.

Even if the Bradley has a great record of signaling long term stock market turns, at certain times it has failed completely to signal an important turn. Why ? Because sometimes the positive and negative weights in the Bradley formula will cancel each other out and the Bradley will NOT indicate a turn, even if the geometry of the planets would indicate otherwise.

Thanks jnevins. My demo account expired on timing solution and as promised the projection line doesn´t work at all.

End of the week recap.... The market kept heading higher after my expected turn. Nevertheless, there was a net gain of 57 pips. Prediction was posted May 22.

Outlook for next week...

Down week in store... keep an eye out for a CIT around 02:15 Friday, UTC+3

Dk blue line is Moon synodic cycle, 1/5th harmonic 50% sm orb. Red is Harmonic box distillation of the Spectrum peaks.

I had another good week, with your chart in mind racked up 101 pips. I still have my sell over the weekend so I like the next projection.

Thank you Mr Jnevins and and other traders who take the time to educate us new and old traders to your way of looking at the EU.

Have a great weekend all

would you mind running the similarity function for this week. thanks

Thanks for this. Matches my prediction.

Thanks enoeraew, one still has to be on their toes to protect you gains with regular TA... this way of looking at the EU helps me to feel more confident about those entries and exits...

Sure thing.. here you go... the line is price action from the week of Friday March 27, 2020 and the subsequent week.

The second image is a look at those 2 weeks, March 23 - April 3.

What worries me with this week's prediction is the CIT I am expecting on June 2 and 3 .....

Sun 135* Jupiter
Venus sq. Mars
Sun conj. Venus

However, my only hesitation is that, from just observing price action and time cycles, I feel a new extended upward trend is about to commence. So the next phase may be upwards. We shall see.