For all the stock buyers in dream-la-la-land The Fed's "Not-QE" & The $33 Trillion Stock Market In Three Charts that is really really a good one....
- #24,241
- Jan 4, 2020 1:33am Jan 4, 2020 1:33am
- Joined Aug 2016 | Status: Trader | 10,425 Posts | Online Now
- #24,243
- Jan 27, 2020 8:43am Jan 27, 2020 8:43am
- Joined Jun 2010 | Status: zero | 20,603 Posts
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-in-guantanamo
A country run by psychopaths, sociopaths and perverts.....
No other words for that....
A country run by psychopaths, sociopaths and perverts.....
No other words for that....
- #24,244
- Feb 5, 2020 11:54pm Feb 5, 2020 11:54pm
- Joined Jun 2010 | Status: zero | 20,603 Posts
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...-in-guantanamo
- #24,247
- Feb 12, 2020 5:06am Feb 12, 2020 5:06am
- Joined Apr 2013 | Status: Now I know you | 5,576 Posts
don't predict direction, but dance with flow of water
- #24,248
- Feb 12, 2020 10:25am Feb 12, 2020 10:25am
- Joined Jun 2010 | Status: zero | 20,603 Posts
EURUSD
now below of the low from Oct 2019
Elliotticans need to do serious recounting now
very tricky and wired structure since the low from Oct 2019
first I thought, we would get a big 1-2, 1,2 movement,
but to be honest, the first 1 has a slight overlap between 4 and 1 (leading diagonal), and the second wave 1 would have also been a leading diagonal.
What is the chance of seeing two leading diagonals one after the other???
So next best idea was to assume that the wave up from the low in Oct 2019 was wave 1, followed by an ABC-flat, where the high on 31.12.2019 was the wave B of this flat.
But with today's price below the low from Oct 2019, this is also moot.
So we once again have to judge the whole structure from the top in Feb 2018
What can we make out of this?
maybe this?
Is this a possible context?
Swannell found, that in an ABC flat the wave B is max. around 200% of wave A, where most of the time the length is between 75 and 160%. We are between 160 and 200%
In above case the count would be valid from this point.
By looking on wave C, Swannell found that the extremes would be 15% and 295% of A, where most of the times it would be between round about 90 and 200%.
In above shown count we are roughly around 70%.
In other words, the count is valid, but likelihood is a bit low.
So let us give it another try:
Wave Z can go lower than pictured!
May be a valid count. Pitty is, that Swannell had not enough data on triple threes or triple zigzags for the statistics. It would have been more compelling, when the waves "x" had retraced more (best 50% or more). But that is not the case here.
now below of the low from Oct 2019
Elliotticans need to do serious recounting now
very tricky and wired structure since the low from Oct 2019
first I thought, we would get a big 1-2, 1,2 movement,
but to be honest, the first 1 has a slight overlap between 4 and 1 (leading diagonal), and the second wave 1 would have also been a leading diagonal.
What is the chance of seeing two leading diagonals one after the other???
So next best idea was to assume that the wave up from the low in Oct 2019 was wave 1, followed by an ABC-flat, where the high on 31.12.2019 was the wave B of this flat.
But with today's price below the low from Oct 2019, this is also moot.
So we once again have to judge the whole structure from the top in Feb 2018
What can we make out of this?
maybe this?
Is this a possible context?
Swannell found, that in an ABC flat the wave B is max. around 200% of wave A, where most of the time the length is between 75 and 160%. We are between 160 and 200%
In above case the count would be valid from this point.
By looking on wave C, Swannell found that the extremes would be 15% and 295% of A, where most of the times it would be between round about 90 and 200%.
In above shown count we are roughly around 70%.
In other words, the count is valid, but likelihood is a bit low.
So let us give it another try:
Wave Z can go lower than pictured!
May be a valid count. Pitty is, that Swannell had not enough data on triple threes or triple zigzags for the statistics. It would have been more compelling, when the waves "x" had retraced more (best 50% or more). But that is not the case here.
- #24,249
- Feb 12, 2020 11:33am Feb 12, 2020 11:33am
- Joined Jun 2010 | Status: zero | 20,603 Posts
eurusd
1h TF
Channel
1h TF
Channel
- #24,250
- Feb 14, 2020 6:54am Feb 14, 2020 6:54am
- Joined Jun 2010 | Status: zero | 20,603 Posts
eurusd 1h TF Channel {image}
channel again
15min TF
