Disliked{quote} This is exactly why you shouldn't trust them. They forgave negative balances because they are on the other side of your trade. It's like betting with a bookie where he has control on the outcome of the game. This is why so many brokers took a hit and even went out of business. Those were the true DMA brokers not holding the other side. So, yeah, of course they were able to forgive negative balances, THEY WERE HOLDING THE MONEY.Ignored
OANDA is a market maker so it has to take the opposite side of all trades no matter how big the trades are if it doesn't have enough trading volume on that opposite side of the trades. Anything wrong with that?
If you don't mind please answer this simple question. Would you rather trade with a broker that is regulated, makes good profits and has lots of liquidity or a broker that is regulated or not, makes low profits and is always on the verge of bankruptcy? By the way 3 brokers went bust on me over the years, 2 of them were regulated and I got my money back. By the way it took 16 months to get my money back when Alpari UK went bust. I lost over $46,000 with the other broker that was not regulated. Well I learned from this mistake
2