Hidden divergence

Quoting Ill-b-back

Disliked

{quote} Without positive thinking, how is anything positive achieved in life? How on earth does one achieve a goal unless one believes they can achieve it? 1) If you don't think you can achieve something, you give up and (you guessed it) you don't achieve it. 2) If you believe you can achieve something, you strive until you either achieve it or until you no longer believe you can. "Positive thinking means being untruthful". This then means one is to assume the negative as being truth (see 1 above). Such is life...

Ignored

Quoting drsa1970

Disliked

Hi Chamane, I like the strategy and trading logic behind that, and I was following the thread for the last few days. would like to make sure if below setup is a valid trade setup for USDJPY(W1/D1) ? {image}

Ignored

Quoting chamane

Disliked

{quote} Hi drsa1970, I am also following that pair. The HD pattern is clear enough on the Weekly chart even though there is some noise between the peaks. I switch to the Daily chart and wait for an entry signal. For me, price will have to cross the dotted trendline and MACD cross the 0 level (yellow circles). (Also, there is a regular divergence on the Daily TF). If it ever happens, it will mean the start of a trading zone and I will enter a short trade at each MACD signal on the 2 HR chart. But we have to be patient and wait for the right setup....

Ignored

Quoting MrDarren

Disliked

i am in {image}

Ignored

Quoting Mingary

Disliked

{quote} 1) and 2) have nothing to do with "positive thinking" ""Positive thinking means being untruthful". This then means one is to assume the negative as being truth (see 1 above)." Indeed, "negative thinking" - until proven otherwise - should be the default position rather than "positive thinking", but neither is best.

Ignored

Quoting MrDarren

Disliked

SL+ let's profit run !!! {image}

Ignored

Quoting vitall

Disliked

{quote} That was RD not HD Did you use H4 to enter or indicator crossing on D1?

Ignored

Quoting Ill-b-back

Disliked

{quote} No. "Positive thinking" - until convinced otherwise - should be the default position.

Ignored

Quoting Mingary

Disliked

{quote} I said neither is best. so, no. No default position is best. "Positive thinking" the glass is half-full "Negative thinking" the glass is half-empty No amount of positive or negative thinking will change the fact that the glass is filled half-way

Ignored

Quoting Ill-b-back

Disliked

{quote} You said "negative thinking" should be default position.

Ignored

Quoting Mingary

Disliked

{quote} 1) and 2) have nothing to do with "positive thinking" ""Positive thinking means being untruthful". This then means one is to assume the negative as being truth (see 1 above)." Indeed, "negative thinking" - until proven otherwise - should be the default position rather than "positive thinking", but neither is best.

Ignored

Quoting Mingary

Disliked

{quote} No amount of positive or negative thinking will change the fact that the glass is filled half-way

Ignored

Quoting Mingary

Disliked

{quote} Why would I say that. That would make no sense at all... {quote}

Ignored

Quoting MrDarren

Disliked

{quote} hello bro, i am using classic divergence and hidden divergence for trigger. I am using H1-D1 time frame.

Ignored

Quoting Ill-b-back

Disliked

{quote} Correct. But if we see it as half full (positive), we can perceive ourselves achieving something, therefore trying it, persisting with it until we achieve it or until we no longer believe we can, so eventually give up. If we see it as half empty (negative), we struggle to perceive we can achieve something, and either don't bother trying or give up too easily as our early failed attempts confirm in our minds, our preconceived notion we can't do it.

Ignored