Disliked{quote} So life is...the first I had problems to understand it and coded it wrong...the second big....big...big problem was the changing to 26 pairs...there were heavy pairs and I know that for 2-3 months my EA had problems at THIS point...but I have solved and use my "original" "wrong" strategy which I have calculated to be more successful on selected pairs...such is life...I done my best but it was not good enough at this moment...sorry for you... And I did not left...there was another EA coded which was tested...and you can t have 2 EAs for 1...Ignored
- View Post
- Disliked by Thread Starter
- View Post
- Disliked by Thread Starter
- Joined Aug 2015 | Status: Vucking good EA coder I am! | 2,302 Posts
{quote} Just saying, even if your original/wrong strategy is more successful- you are acknowledging that the Williams %R was the base you built upon. The original creator is Chris, is there anything preventing you from sharing it with him? It is in good faith. If it is not your intention, how does it help when you say it makes "XXX"% and is better, but refuse to go into details.
Please note that there will not be anymore additions or changes. This is the final version, if you really need something else added you will need to write your own EA
This is very clearly said that there is NO wish to change anything at this strategy...that s why I was free at this point!
Vucking good EA coder...
- Joined Jul 2015 | Status: Member | 2,269 Posts | Invisible
{quote} https://www.forexfactory.com/showthr...7#post12373367 Please note that there will not be anymore additions or changes. This is the final version, if you really need something else added you will need to write your own EA
It does not say, you should not share the work with the original creator.
1. Chris shared his work- You claim you have a better version of the same- All i am saying is, it would be in good faith if you share it with Chris only[not with the whole ff community]
2. Currently people are testing the EA's performance and sharing the results. If some one says, "look i am making XXX%" , but it is a different version and does not want go into more details-it does not add value to what is currently being done.
Thanks
- View Post
- Disliked by Thread Starter
- View Post
- Disliked by Thread Starter
- View Post
- Disliked by Thread Starter
- View Post
- Disliked by Thread Starter
- Joined Apr 2013 | Status: Member | 1,158 Posts
Long weekend...yeah!
Here are the results from June 5 to August 30 2019...DD not changed much.
Gold charts 15min to daily.
Chris
Here are the results from June 5 to August 30 2019...DD not changed much.
Gold charts 15min to daily.
Chris
- Joined Apr 2013 | Status: Member | 1,158 Posts
Another week under our belts...DD is gone but closed few 4 hr trades in loss. That is OK.
I have realised that this whole time there were two trades from before testing this system that I had forgot about. Right now they account for basically all of the shown DD, so my DD the past few months was not nearly as bad as I thought.
Anyway, here are the results from June 5 to Sept 6 2019.
Nice weekend to you, Chris.
So what the results tell me is that with an account around $10,000.00 you can run this system with the current parameters, if you had $15,000.00 to $20,000.00 then you could step up the position size and start making a supplemental income.
I have realised that this whole time there were two trades from before testing this system that I had forgot about. Right now they account for basically all of the shown DD, so my DD the past few months was not nearly as bad as I thought
.Anyway, here are the results from June 5 to Sept 6 2019.
Nice weekend to you, Chris.
So what the results tell me is that with an account around $10,000.00 you can run this system with the current parameters, if you had $15,000.00 to $20,000.00 then you could step up the position size and start making a supplemental income.
- | Joined Jun 2014 | Status: Invisible | 1,484 Posts
Another week under our belts...DD is gone but closed few 4 hr trades in loss. That is OK. I have realised that this whole time there were two trades from before testing this system that I had forgot about. Right now they account for basically all of the shown DD, so my DD the past few months was not nearly as bad as I thought
Is this still without SL and kijun except for M15 (kijun)?
Looking at the DD, it seems that if you square the position size to the same DD level, you get far better results with kijun (and on H1 also with arrow SL) - on M15....H1 (got no results for H4, D1).
- Joined Jul 2015 | Status: Member | 2,269 Posts | Invisible
Another week under our belts...DD is gone but closed few 4 hr trades in loss. That is OK. I have realised that this whole time there were two trades from before testing this system that I had forgot about. Right now they account for basically all of the shown DD, so my DD the past few months was not nearly as bad as I thought
- Joined Apr 2013 | Status: Member | 1,158 Posts
Nice results aaven...Thank you for you help and dedication to this system. I appreciate it.
I think this thread has proved that this concept can bring profits consistently.
I am working on another system (just posted an EA tester request with Abokwaik on his thread in Platform Tech).
If I can get good results from that, too, then we could have several EAs bringing in steady income
I will keep posting weekly results but I feel this thread has come to it's conclusion.
Thank you everyone, Chris.
PS...It's my birthday today so it is nice to end on a positive note
I think this thread has proved that this concept can bring profits consistently.
I am working on another system (just posted an EA tester request with Abokwaik on his thread in Platform Tech).
If I can get good results from that, too, then we could have several EAs bringing in steady income
I will keep posting weekly results but I feel this thread has come to it's conclusion.
Thank you everyone, Chris.
PS...It's my birthday today so it is nice to end on a positive note