SDTR Strategy Part II | Page 44 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

WRB/MC strategy:Coder needed to semi-automate my strategy 11 replies

strategy builder/tester for new scalping strategy 1 reply

Is opposite of losing strategy a winning strategy? 21 replies

Bollinger Band deviation strategy Part I 12 replies

Trading: Part Science and Part Art 28 replies

Attachments: SDTR Strategy Part II
Exit Attachments

SDTR Strategy Part II

  • #861
  • Edited 1:29am May 29, 2019 1:16am | Edited 1:29am
Quoting chrisdk2017
{quote} Interesting: From 6th May - today, H1: 194 pips. From 6th May - today, H4: 64 pips. D1 nothing here as well. H1 preset attached. Can you check which differences there are between mine and yours? {file}
Hi chrisdk2017,

There is another difference. Your EA trade 28 pairs (not 15 pairs)

best of luck
  • #862
  • May 29, 2019 8:21am May 29, 2019 8:21am
Quoting akizama
I still can’t seem to figure out how to get the support residence to show properly on h1 and daily time frame.
What S&R? Use the template on first post to load all the indicators correctly as they should be used.
Truth is like poetry. And most people f*cking hate poetry.
  • #863
  • May 29, 2019 4:45pm May 29, 2019 4:45pm
Quoting mrdfx
{quote} What S&R? Use the template on first post to load all the indicators correctly as they should be used.
Got it! nvm thank you.
  • #864
  • May 29, 2019 4:45pm May 29, 2019 4:45pm
I would really love if people can start posting there charts helps the learning experience.
  • #865
  • May 30, 2019 12:47pm May 30, 2019 12:47pm
Buy order opened earlier today on EJ on H4. All requirements was met and the EA was correct.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screen Shot 2019-05-30 at 14.45.39.png Size: 168 KB
Truth is like poetry. And most people f*cking hate poetry.
  • #866
  • Edited 5:38am May 31, 2019 1:48am | Edited 5:38am
Quoting Sergey-Sh
That's interesting...No signal P.S. The indicator was right. I got S/L {image} {image}
HI Sergey,

The EA didn't give a signal. But your entry was according to rules.
  • #867
  • May 31, 2019 2:27am May 31, 2019 2:27am
Quoting Mhd19
Wow, cool Fareed51. I have also applied it to the chart, but I have not dared to do it on a real account. looking at the results of the previous backtest, I was quite interested. but I am still traumatized by EA, because a few months ago my account balance was used up to 800 usd due to ea. at that time I used EA grid, martingale, also semi grid, semi martingale, and semi hedging. In the beginning, the profit was very high. In one day it reaches 50 usd. But, when market trending, the resulting floating minus swells very large. Even though before...
Better for you to trade manually.
  • #868
  • May 31, 2019 2:33am May 31, 2019 2:33am
Quoting chrisdk2017
Performance so far using 0.01 lot and both H1 and H4. V 1.26 of the EA. {image}
hi chrisdk2017,

nice results. The .set files you are using from page 1?

Thanks.
  • #869
  • May 31, 2019 2:38am May 31, 2019 2:38am
Quoting luaciego
{quote} I had a problem with the ea where it enter a trade multiple times. It lost like 27 dollars like that.
It also happened to me. Though I am using v1.27 from the first page
  • #870
  • Jun 4, 2019 3:12pm Jun 4, 2019 3:12pm
Guys I have removed the EA from this thread and will no longer be using it.

After monitoring the EA there were still come small bugs and unfortunately chrisdk2017 will no longer be assisting in the further development of the EA.

I will revert back to manual trading only and post set ups when I get them.

I am still open to another EA being created as I do believe its possible for this strategy to be automated successfully.
Truth is like poetry. And most people f*cking hate poetry.
  • #871
  • Jun 7, 2019 2:47am Jun 7, 2019 2:47am
Quoting mrdfx
Guys I have removed the EA from this thread and will no longer be using it. After monitoring the EA there were still come small bugs and unfortunately chrisdk2017 will no longer be assisting in the further development of the EA. I will revert back to manual trading only and post set ups when I get them. I am still open to another EA being created as I do believe its possible for this strategy to be automated successfully.
Hi mrdfx,

I am still doing the forward test at TF4. The main problem of this EA is that it opens multiple trades at the same price though "allow re-entries of the same pair" is set to false. But the filtering of this EA is nice. I like it.
  • #872
  • Jun 7, 2019 8:40am Jun 7, 2019 8:40am
Quoting salimc
{quote} Hi mrdfx, I am still doing the forward test at TF4. The main problem of this EA is that it opens multiple trades at the same price though "allow re-entries of the same pair" is set to false. But the filtering of this EA is nice. I like it.
Yes I still believe this EA has the potential to be profitable but unfortunately it still has a few bugs. I don't know anything about coding otherwise I would try to fix it myself or have developed it myself.

We need someone with coding knowledge to come in and help fix the small bugs and then we can all enjoy the EA together.
Truth is like poetry. And most people f*cking hate poetry.
  • #873
  • Jun 7, 2019 10:28am Jun 7, 2019 10:28am
Quoting mrdfx
{quote} Yes I still believe this EA has the potential to be profitable but unfortunately it still has a few bugs. I don't know anything about coding otherwise I would try to fix it myself or have developed it myself. We need someone with coding knowledge to come in and help fix the small bugs and then we can all enjoy the EA together.
Right you are. let's wait.
  • #874
  • Jun 8, 2019 3:04pm Jun 8, 2019 3:04pm
Quoting mrdfx
{quote} Yes I still believe this EA has the potential to be profitable but unfortunately it still has a few bugs. I don't know anything about coding otherwise I would try to fix it myself or have developed it myself. We need someone with coding knowledge to come in and help fix the small bugs and then we can all enjoy the EA together.
Can u inform me about the bugs that the EA is having now? Can we add another filter (as its performance in the hourly chart is not good)? If I have all the information I may talk to a coder.
Thanks.
  • #875
  • Jun 12, 2019 8:35am Jun 12, 2019 8:35am
You say that the arrow repaints. Is it still possible to backtest this strategy?
  • #876
  • Jun 13, 2019 1:45am Jun 13, 2019 1:45am
According to the rules in Post #1long trades should be taken only at levels, S61, S78, S100 only!
Would you not take a trade at pivots with a higher number?
  • #877
  • Jun 13, 2019 1:55am Jun 13, 2019 1:55am
Does anyone know the sucess rate of this strategy using the parameters given in Post #1?
Has anyone tried it using SMA5 instead o fEMA10?
  • #878
  • Jun 28, 2019 9:13am Jun 28, 2019 9:13am
Quoting mrdfx
Hello guys a very happy new year to you and I wish you a prosperous and profitable 2019! As its a new year and to new beginnings, I thought its a good idea to reboot the Simple Daily Trend Reversal strategy and start a new thread. The first thread was very successful when it started in 2017, and also in 2018 with over 224 pages, 4463 posts, and over 1.3m views! We had many great developments, and we learned a lot. You can find the first Simple Daily Trend Reversal thread here: https://www.forexfactory.com/showthread.php?t=713593...
Please can someone upload the set files. i dont see the indicators when i attach the template. i want to set them manually. thank you
  • #879
  • Jul 2, 2019 10:39pm Jul 2, 2019 10:39pm
Thank Master for your sharing and impressive method.
Trend reversal trading always carry the risk when countering the waves, but always are very attractive to traders for huge profit.
How do you think about adding the Divergence to confirmation of trend reversals more accurately?
  • #880
  • Edited Jul 4, 2019 1:50am Jul 3, 2019 10:04am | Edited Jul 4, 2019 1:50am
Quoting matthew89
I have been observing this method for a while now, and as good as it is, I think another filter would be a good idea. If the markets are heavily trending then this is the killer of any reversal type system. Does anyone have a suggestion of another filter that could be added to this system? Ideally one which stops us entering trades when the trend is too strong? Perhaps if the the ADX is above an extreme level then ignore the setup?
There is so much most people need to learn about the idea of PERSPECTIVE and RELATIVITY. An obvious trend on a large timeframe chart can and WILL have lower time frame charts cycling through down and up trends. These cycles on an m5 chart won't even register on a daily chart, but they can be PERFECTLY VALID up trends and down trends on the m5 chart! Don't try to say , "Oh, that's nonsense, because the m5 is too small." This whole idea of PERSPECTIVE and RELATIVITY means if you are given three charts to view without any indication of the time frames EXCEPT that the middle chart is 4x the smallest chart, and the largest chart is 4X the middle chart, you will see the SAME RELATIONSHIPS of trends and cycling among those three charts NO MATTER WHAT YOU USE for the smallest!!! Without any indication of the actual time frame, you would not know m1-m4-m16 from H1-H4-H16!

Looking at charts of the CORRECT RATIOS of timeframes is the core of Intrinsic Market Timing (IMT). The "timing", that is, is it time to make an entry on chart X, is BUILT IN to the price movements that unfold over time on a series of charts. Using IMT, you will have few mistakes making "correct" entries. You WILL have some good entries that turn into losing trades because unexpected events can trigger an immediate move against you that runs to your stop. This does not mean that you made a WRONG ENTRY; it merely is one of the uncontrollable, unanticipatable events that sometimes happens. Same as with the reversal signals here. As some have already seen, you made an entry absolutely according to the rules of this system, but some event occurred after entry that resulted in a losing trade. If you find that over time your account is shrinking, even though you absolutely followed the rules, then clearly, other rules are needed that will reduce the number of entries that turn into losers. This takes time, work, and analysis of those losing trades to try to find out if they have some commonality that you can make use of to add a new rule to filter them out.

So, let's say that you are watching the H1 for a reversal signal; you need to be checking H4 and m15 as a filters.

If H1 is signaling a buy, how does the H4 chart look? Does it look like H4 is just now ready to go up, making a reversal from being in a downtrend, or does this look like H4 has been going up a while, has been in a pullback, and MAYBE will continue up, but no signal that it is reversing. If you see the former, then there is HIGH PROBABILITY that H4 is going to signal a reversal. Now, before just jumping in on the H1 buy signal, look at M15. Is it still going up, or is it either stalled or even going down now? Obviously, if it is going down, the H4 CANNOT POSSIBLY continue going up to make a reversal signal when price is going the wrong way! So now you need to sit and wait for m15 to SHOW YOU PROOF that the trend really is reversing on the larger charts. The proof is, if, during this time that the m15 travels down, the H1 does NOT also turn down before the m15 turns back up. Then when m15 turns up, look for the buy signals on m15, H1, and H4. Take the buys in order, as long as the price simply runs up. If you made buys on either m15 or H1 but H4 has not yet made the buy signal and then either m15 or H1 turns down, you once again must wait for the turn back up to CONFIRM a high probability that H4 will now signal a buy. (If BOTH m15 and H1 turn down, stop looking at m15; H1 must make the turn back up.

That is your introduction to IMT as an additional filter.
To free Gazans of Hamas, use whatever it takes.
0 traders viewing now