Disliked{quote} @moodyboot / andy I am not surprised to see your answer because from what I have read on george thread you most often behave as George's first "stringer" to explain to the general public an specifically to people to people who have some doubts about george "method", who asks charts with detailed explanations, and more simply a methodology which could be replicable by everyone. For the fun I am analyzing progressively ALL writings of George. To be clear for everyone on FF, on this thread and specifically for @robots4me initiator of this thread...Ignored
The thread is becoming a bit unmanageable for me. I'd like to return to the basics -- that is, focusing on the indicators @SwingMan and I have created. The use of higher-level fractals and MTF to generate target levels (TOPS and BOTTOMS) seems to be of value. And I'd like to continue in that direction -- to improve the indicator. @TopCover just now mentioned detecting 'gaps'. I'm not clear about their significance, but this is the kind of thing I'd like to see more of.
Going forward, if you are going to share a chart please include our indicator and a clear description of what you think could be an improvement and why.
Thanks...
4