High Level Accuracy Method With Little To NO Draw-down

Quoting newbegger

Disliked

{quote} wow, true polar bear club. Got freezing temps at my place, I have layered close on to stay warm. My house is too big to keep at boxer shorts temps in the winter. Time to sell this huge house. It's too much house to heat at a comfortable temp for empty nest.

Ignored

Quoting Moof

Disliked

Hi FXCyborg, Thanks for your thread. 3 trades taken during the Asian session today, I think I need to pass on the low RR trades and the GBPJPY entry was shaky at best. Your thoughts would be appreciated.{image}{image}{image}

Ignored

Quoting fxLoveLots

Disliked

Hello, FXCyborg I think I found a setup within setup according to what we should be looking for as the perfect setup. Please comment if I'm doing it correctly Question 1: 30M entry already happened but wasn't great setup since drawdown (RR) not great. So I drilled down eventually to the 1M to find setup with setup (from 30M to 1M) with best RR. as you explained BUT 30M entry already triggered. So is the 1M (setup with setup) still valid for entry? Question 2: Is TP for 1M setup is 30M structural low, if I understand your...

Ignored

Quoting iamsovereign

Disliked

edit-- combine this with the DOM and it complements this very well. Hi, maybe a stupid qurstion but what do you mean with DOM? Regards

Ignored

Quoting vonboettiche

Disliked

Hey, what happens when we see two valid setups? Here I have a buy and a sell setup on 15m TF for GBPUSD {image}

Ignored

Quoting spreadbet

Disliked

{quote} i ll answer to see if i understand the set up correctly. the sell set up is invalided because the 3rd bar is engulfing the 2 bars, not just the last one. and the trend is up so only buy set up. the up set up seems good, in lower time frame no set up in set up so i guess that you just have to wait for a restest..

Ignored