Thanks Zoltan.
Pete, you ask a very good question. A couple of weeks ago in preparation to make our Pro traders investable, we merged their histories that qualified them for the program with their AxiSelect program. This has prompted a number of valuable questions from the community.
Here is the key point we are trying to achieve.
A trader can enter the AxiSelect program with a 2 yr stellar track record. They can make it all the way through to Pro (roughly 6 months with say 1% performance) with a score of say 70. This 6 month Pro track record is not marketable. What we decided to do is merge the history and provide a clear mark on the performance FACT SHEET to show performance prior to joining the program and post.
I hope this is clear and yes if anyone has a better solution let me know.
Pete, you ask a very good question. A couple of weeks ago in preparation to make our Pro traders investable, we merged their histories that qualified them for the program with their AxiSelect program. This has prompted a number of valuable questions from the community.
Here is the key point we are trying to achieve.
A trader can enter the AxiSelect program with a 2 yr stellar track record. They can make it all the way through to Pro (roughly 6 months with say 1% performance) with a score of say 70. This 6 month Pro track record is not marketable. What we decided to do is merge the history and provide a clear mark on the performance FACT SHEET to show performance prior to joining the program and post.
I hope this is clear and yes if anyone has a better solution let me know.
each and every one will have "red flags"...i would say lag in one area or another when compare to another. given that there is no perfect one, the overall experience what should be considered. ( in mind what i said above: ultimately it is broker vs trader, and the broker has the upper hand when comes to decisions, like price filled, A or B book, spread, commission, etc)