My "Ultron" EA for GBPUSD H1 timeframe | Page 16 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Broker Challenge "NDD/STP" vs. True "ECN" and "Mkt Mkr" broker talk 46 replies

Dealing with "Invalid Price", "Requote", "Server Busy" in MT4 3 replies

Timeframe inside current timeframe - is that possible? 2 replies

Seeing higher timeframe indicators on lower timeframe 4 replies

Finding the best "personal" timeframe! 6 replies

Attachments: My "Ultron" EA for GBPUSD H1 timeframe
Exit Attachments

My "Ultron" EA for GBPUSD H1 timeframe

  • #301
  • Nov 13, 2018 11:12pm Nov 13, 2018 11:12pm
Hey If somebody thinks that he can improve this EA it's ok. As I told you in the first post, you can do whatever you want. We can learn from each other, and maybe I'm wrong about some things. If anybody has taken an effort to create a better version and is willing to share it, I'm happy with it.

My only wish is that you will respect that my version has OP in its name. If somebody didn't read that... fine but next time please be aware of my rule.
It's not because I claim that my version is superior or something, it's possible to create something better - always.
The problem is that as an original poster I receive a lot of messages, and cannot help if it's not my code, simply because I don't have that much time now for analysing everything I receive.

So I would like to thanks everybody for their effort in making this EA even better, but please, we need some order, otherwise, this thread will become a mess.

Have a nice day!
  • #302
  • Nov 13, 2018 11:16pm Nov 13, 2018 11:16pm
Quoting robots4me
{quote}Give the OP the pleasure of "owning" his project without everyone and their brother sticking their hands in and trying to take credit.
Thank you for your support! But I stated at the beginning that it's something like open source now, this is why I have shared this code with people. We just need some order in this thread

I do not claim that I'm the best if somebody will make improvement and others will approve that it works then it's ok for me that people will use this version.
People just should not mess with names, because it creates a mess in the thread.

Have a nice day!
  • #303
  • Nov 13, 2018 11:20pm Nov 13, 2018 11:20pm
Quoting Pawel.Gawron
Hey If somebody thinks that he can improve this EA it's ok. As I told you in the first post, you can do whatever you want. We can learn from each other, and maybe I'm wrong about some things. If anybody has taken an effort to create a better version and is willing to share it, I'm happy with it. My only wish is that you will respect that my version has OP in its name. If somebody didn't read that... fine but next time please be aware of my rule. It's not because I claim that my version is superior or something, it's possible to create something...
Thanks Mate
i have tried to start trades with a trend, now i prefer to follow the trend
  • #304
  • Nov 13, 2018 11:25pm Nov 13, 2018 11:25pm
Quoting Feex
{quote} No bad!)) {image}
Thanks for the work you do here. i need your recommendation on the best way to optimize results here. please recommend for me
1. The Version of this EA to use

2. Deposite/lot size.

3. Trailing stop? if yes, what value should be used.

i have read all the post here, i just want you to help me confirm my thoughts. Thanks
i have tried to start trades with a trend, now i prefer to follow the trend
  • #305
  • Nov 13, 2018 11:50pm Nov 13, 2018 11:50pm
Quoting Pawel.Gawron
Hey If somebody thinks that he can improve this EA it's ok. As I told you in the first post, you can do whatever you want. We can learn from each other, and maybe I'm wrong about some things. If anybody has taken an effort to create a better version and is willing to share it, I'm happy with it. My only wish is that you will respect that my version has OP in its name. If somebody didn't read that... fine but next time please be aware of my rule. It's not because I claim that my version is superior or something, it's possible to create something...
Thank you for the correct understanding of the situation. Unfortunately, not everyone thinks like you. And thanks for the interesting EA) I would say an unexpected EA. Very small code and very good prospects. All ingenious is simple)
  • #306
  • Nov 14, 2018 4:21am Nov 14, 2018 4:21am
i have installed but it wont open trades? it needs any indicator? in almost 2 weeks i only have one trade

thanks
  • #307
  • Nov 14, 2018 5:00am Nov 14, 2018 5:00am
Quoting smecas
i have installed but it wont open trades? it needs any indicator? in almost 2 weeks i only have one trade thanks
All you and I need is, Patience. It opened 3 trades this month. This screenshot is from a real account.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: ultron-ss.JPG Size: 73 KB
  • #308
  • Nov 14, 2018 6:55am Nov 14, 2018 6:55am
All ingenious is simple) = quote from Feex =
da n0o0b + $hit_Disturber
  • #309
  • Nov 14, 2018 7:20am Nov 14, 2018 7:20am
I did a backtest from 2001 to now. It had a period of many fails and lost most of the account from about May of 2008 to July of 2011. Anyone else run a backtest this far back and have the same results?

I find it odd that it is very successful but has a 3 year period of mostly losses. Anyone have an explanation?

I put the vertical lines on the chart to show the period where the draw down occurred.
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Untitled.png Size: 174 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: download.png Size: 52 KB
  • #310
  • Nov 14, 2018 7:57am Nov 14, 2018 7:57am
It started in a mood of eerie calm, but then 2008 exploded into a global financial earthquake. Nick Mathiason and Heather Stewart look back at events that shook, and brought down, giants


https://www.theguardian.com/business...h-banking-2008
da n0o0b + $hit_Disturber
  • #311
  • Nov 14, 2018 8:03am Nov 14, 2018 8:03am
Quoting pipsy7
It started in a mood of eerie calm, but then 2008 exploded into a global financial earthquake. Nick Mathiason and Heather Stewart look back at events that shook, and brought down, giants https://www.theguardian.com/business...h-banking-2008
Basically even this happens again Turn off ultron. Wait for an adapted condition When we are out of Go back to good old ultron
  • #312
  • Nov 14, 2018 9:17am Nov 14, 2018 9:17am
Quoting Evgeniy.Pro
{quote} Dear Emonts. Thank you for posting the mql5 version of EA here. But could you post the source code as well? I do not like to test the EA without knowing exactly what is inside. And for sure I may have the desire to change something. Thank you in advance.
Hi,

Send me email address.

BR
It is not important how often you fall down, but how often you get up again
  • #313
  • Nov 14, 2018 9:56am Nov 14, 2018 9:56am
Quoting meepstone
I did a backtest from 2001 to now. It had a period of many fails and lost most of the account from about May of 2008 to July of 2011. Anyone else run a backtest this far back and have the same results? I find it odd that it is very successful but has a 3 year period of mostly losses. Anyone have an explanation? I put the vertical lines on the chart to show the period where the draw down occurred. {image} {image}
There was a discussion about this few pages earlier. It's possible to make ultron perform OK in such conditions. Maybe there is a way to make this EA auto correction of its behaviors, I don't know. Current settings are not made for extreme crisis, like the one from 2008
  • #314
  • Edited 11:22am Nov 14, 2018 11:04am | Edited 11:22am
We got lift off...a bit too far from MA..is it correct? Red is calibrated MA based on the last 6 months....yellow is original MA 50

Calibrated gave a signal, MA 50 - did not...
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 243 KB
  • #315
  • Nov 14, 2018 11:08am Nov 14, 2018 11:08am
Really? Nothing on mine
  • #316
  • Nov 14, 2018 11:44am Nov 14, 2018 11:44am
and ..a SL...that was a quickie
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Screenshot1.png Size: 244 KB
  • #317
  • Nov 14, 2018 1:48pm Nov 14, 2018 1:48pm
Quoting driven18
and ..a SL...that was a quickie {image}
I will trust my original calibration, no position today

But trading is trading, hope you will get a great result in a long-term run.
  • #318
  • Nov 14, 2018 1:52pm Nov 14, 2018 1:52pm
Quoting Ansab001
Really? Nothing on mine
He is using his own modification, I will try to report trades when they will happen.
  • #319
  • Nov 14, 2018 3:39pm Nov 14, 2018 3:39pm
Quoting Pawel.Gawron
{quote} I will trust my original calibration, no position today But trading is trading, hope you will get a great result in a long-term run.
I am actually surprised that MA 50 did not get any signals today, as MA(look at the image) are very close to each other.

Pawel, any comments on why MA 50 did not get any trades today? I believe exponential increase/decrease were at play even for MA 50 today.
  • #320
  • Edited 10:03pm Nov 14, 2018 4:58pm | Edited 10:03pm
Quote
why MA 50 did not get any trades today?

If you want to open a trade because you think the MAs are close enough, then open a manual trade using the same SL and TP. Since the EA does not manage open orders, then the result will be the same as if the EA had opened the order.

Take a look at the source code -- it is very simple. There are a few conditions that have to be met before a signal is generated -- e.g. x > y. Even if x and y are very, very close -- e.g. x is 4.99999 and y is 5.0, the condition will not be met and a signal will not be generated. If you trade manually the human brain can decide whether close is good enough -- but the EA uses algebra and it doesn't know what "close to each other" means.
0 traders viewing now