Quoting FeexDislikedWho told you that we do not respect the author ?!Ignored
2
Broker Challenge "NDD/STP" vs. True "ECN" and "Mkt Mkr" broker talk 46 replies
Dealing with "Invalid Price", "Requote", "Server Busy" in MT4 3 replies
Timeframe inside current timeframe - is that possible? 2 replies
Seeing higher timeframe indicators on lower timeframe 4 replies
Finding the best "personal" timeframe! 6 replies
Quoting FeexDislikedWho told you that we do not respect the author ?!Ignored
Disliked{quote} If you respect the author of EA, then you should have read his post, where he asked not to use "OP" in the name of any modification. But you did not read it either. What's wrong with you?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Wow, you are on war path, or what? No I did not read that. Sorry, just try to help. But i don't see why you attacking me? Let's keep it friendly here.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Because you added your name and Yuriyzp at the top of the display -- as though this was your EA. Your modifications did not improve the algorithm or its performance -- yet you insert yourself in the code and attempt to take credit for something you did not create. Very uncool...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Wow, you are on war path, or what? No I did not read that. Sorry, just try to help. But i don't see why you attacking me? Let's keep it friendly here.Ignored
Quoting FeexDislikedIf the price has not reached 73 pips and has gone back, then the order will close at 68 pips, as programmed in EA.Ignored
Quoting FeexDislikedEspecially for the blind showing the picture: Who sees well will be able to easily notice that the author’s copyright has been preserved! and added authors modification. What's wrong?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Not true -- the next bar could drop by 10 pips (or more) -- and then you would close below 68.Ignored
DislikedObviously @Pawel has spent a lot of time developing and testing the Ultron EA. Why would you want to keep messing with it? Are you so clever that after possessing the code for a few hours you are going to make significant improvements? And for how many weeks or months have you tested your results on a real account? You did one back test? Well, that's reassuring... The original EA is extremely simple -- written in less than 100 lines of code. And it works. It was the author's design and intent to keep it simple. I suggest we honor his request and...Ignored
Quoting FeexDislikedYou are definitely blind)) it says MOD !!!!!! Do you see it?))Ignored
Disliked{quote} The point is that only your name is displayed when the EA runs. Also, "MOD" could mean anything. Perhaps you added something important, perhaps you simply added an information box. No one knows. But you still claim credit -- as though the EA was yours and the original author is long gone. If you really had to add a name -- it would have been more gracious to mention Pawel, rather than just yourself.Ignored
Quoting FeexDislikedI see you know better than me how my code works?)) Fantastic)) But you are mistaken, as always) Lower 68 order can not close!Ignored
Quoting FeexDislikedHow many weeks or months?
How many months have you been testing EA?)))) Do not you think that it is very stupid to ask the question "how many weeks or months" if an EA appeared Oct 27, 2018 6:34am?))Ignored
Disliked{quote} You keep calling me blind, but since you did not provide the *.mq4 source code then there really is no way someone else could confirm, is there? Sort of convenient. Also, sort of selfish, considering the OP shared with you the source code for his Ultron EA. {quote} That was exactly my point -- I was being sarcastic. There is no way you could have done as much thinking and testing as the OP. That is why it seems odd that (a) you think you know better about the EA than the OP, and (2) that because it "seems" to work in the back tester that...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thanks Feex. Can you set the variables similar to your own to see how the results are, can you also backtest the original one with same data (and post all 3 results in one topic). It's nice to see a good comparison as i am not sure if my modified version is an improvement or not. Thanks. /edit: I did some testing myself as well. with the right numbers it does create more profit and the hours are very important to set right. My input data for optimal results; stopLossPips = 525 TakeProfitPips = 700 TralingStopLossRoom = 150 hour1 = 6 hour2...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thanks Feex. Can you set the variables similar to your own to see how the results are, can you also backtest the original one with same data (and post all 3 results in one topic). It's nice to see a good comparison as i am not sure if my modified version is an improvement or not. Thanks. /edit: I did some testing myself as well. with the right numbers it does create more profit and the hours are very important to set right. My input data for optimal results; stopLossPips = 525 TakeProfitPips = 700 TralingStopLossRoom = 150 hour1 = 6 hour2...Ignored