Any non-repaint indicators that work well trading forex | Page 7 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

How To Make Repaint Indicator To Not Repaint? Need Help! 40 replies

Share favorite NON REPAINT, valid and solid indicators here 33 replies

What does it mean when Indicators repaint? 31 replies

Do these Indicators Repaint or Not? 4 replies

MTF indicators that don't repaint 20 replies

Attachments: Any non-repaint indicators that work well trading forex
Exit Attachments

Any non-repaint indicators that work well trading forex

  • #121
  • Mar 17, 2018 9:33am Mar 17, 2018 9:33am
Quoting COmar.FX
{quote} Hi braintheboss .. is this final Fixed from your research, How is development now?
Its the begins. Its only an early build with incomplete algortihm and its surpassing my best theorical performance. Its fractals. Nobody should think it can work as a real SR tool. But really is more similar a wave catcher with strong zones...

PD: Evidently not repaints...
Try don't lose pants never...
  • #122
  • Mar 17, 2018 9:45am Mar 17, 2018 9:45am
This a is small analysis about improvement made for new algorithm...

https://www.forexfactory.com/showthr...4#post10861434
Try don't lose pants never...
  • #123
  • Mar 17, 2018 11:19am Mar 17, 2018 11:19am
Quoting dkrock
{quote} Your screenshot appears to be a bit cherry picked. Correct? I see many reverses, but in history you have ignored them. If that is a real decision, then congratulations! If not, then you are either fooling yourself, or us, or you have missed out on the reversal pips. I am not really sure what you are doing, and frankly, do not take any offense, but I do not really care, so I won't make any real challenges. I only say that because I am not willing to change my strategy, so I am not going to attempt to understand yours. I did compare your results...
Hi please share below indicator on this chart.
  • #124
  • Mar 17, 2018 11:45am Mar 17, 2018 11:45am
Quoting dkrock
{quote} Your screenshot appears to be a bit cherry picked. Correct? I see many reverses, but in history you have ignored them. If that is a real decision, then congratulations! If not, then you are either fooling yourself, or us, or you have missed out on the reversal pips. I am not really sure what you are doing, and frankly, do not take any offense, but I do not really care, so I won't make any real challenges. I only say that because I am not willing to change my strategy, so I am not going to attempt to understand yours. I did compare your results...
Many reverses are 7 pullbacks marked in more 700 pips movement? Its a big trend with a few pullbacks. I didnt ignore pullbacks in capture. Just depending your strategy you will filter it or you will catch some pips in reverse. Anyway are you comparing a D1 chart with a H1? Are you sure you understand the difficult is filter all noise in a low TF?

I reckon coders we have big ego but you show one tool can do same ( in my thread i have different captures showing how adapts to different pairs with same settings ). Maybe im optimistic but I have enough reputation as coder here. Anyway I agree with you in last part. Everyone search their way. Not exists one path or system for success in forex...
Try don't lose pants never...
  • #125
  • Mar 17, 2018 11:48am Mar 17, 2018 11:48am
I forgot one thing. Its fractal tool. Is not a complex or mix of various tools. Is only a different way to detect fractals...
Try don't lose pants never...
  • #126
  • Mar 17, 2018 12:19pm Mar 17, 2018 12:19pm
Quoting dkrock
{quote} I saw your accumulated pip count, which does not show the individual trades along the way. I was just comparing results to see if there was anything of interest to me. I can easily go to the 1HR chart and do the same thing, but I don't think you have any interest. I trade sample sizes, not fractals, but profit is profit. No problem.
Im only showing how I get little zones in big waves legs in low TFs. I'm week trader then I never do that kind of big trades. Anyways using D1 I can get that 700 pips in one trade. In H4 normally zones size are more 300 pips in average.

The special thing is precisely convert to simple fractal tool making 500 zones in one making 50 times less. Maybe for you is not impressive but for be a simple algorithm is better than many pro complex systems
Try don't lose pants never...
  • #127
  • Mar 17, 2018 12:25pm Mar 17, 2018 12:25pm
Quoting dkrock
{quote} All good. You have nothing to prove to me. It is unusual to meet someone who can make profit, and your method is nothing like mine, so it is interesting, but far too different for me to analyze and incorporate. I was showing you an alternative, just as you have shown me an alternative. No problem. Good Luck.
Ok. No problem too. Im always open to opinions
Try don't lose pants never...
  • #128
  • Mar 17, 2018 12:47pm Mar 17, 2018 12:47pm
Quoting braintheboss
{quote} Im only showing how I get little zones in big waves legs in low TFs./quote] In order for me to trade the 1HR chart, I have to trade the 4HR chart. You will be happy to know that I see 5 trades during that period, with 2 of them break-even, so really only 3 trades.
Are you taking zones in my capture as reference. Or is with your system?. I readed the last part now. OK. I will show one thing
Try don't lose pants never...
  • #129
  • Edited 1:34pm Mar 17, 2018 12:52pm | Edited 1:34pm
Im building my own auto system and how all auto systems never works as expected. In my case flat markets kill me but not for common problem having a lot of wrong entries. I use compression price ( consolidation zones ) for place entries. And this sometimes have a side effect in my system. But with new algorithm I get this:
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Captura de pantalla (220).png Size: 99 KB

And its when i solve my system problem because size between zones is enough big for can play to ping pong while market is in range. And last trade always will take the breakout direction as you can see in the last zigzag leg before bull movement

PD: I use zones in reverse ( signals ) closer to zones and directional when a zone is broken. SR are 18 full days. Not bad for be H1 TF
Try don't lose pants never...
  • #130
  • Mar 17, 2018 1:47pm Mar 17, 2018 1:47pm
Quoting dkrock
I absolutely agree that consolidation sucks and is the biggest enemy. I also agree that as long as the movement between signals is large enough for profit, then it is really a range, not a consolidation. I have two methods for defeating it. One is a customized indicator I developed over several years of analysis. The other, more simpler method, is to move to a higher time frame and wait for its signal. Pictorially, you can often find a flag, or pennant, or triangle being drawn between two trend lines, and its breakout also signals the end...
For me consolidation areas normally are short areas after a big movement ( as you commented typical of flags, etc ). But an auto system is simpler then only see 2 areas ( trend and flat/range/consolidation ).

If I say I play in consolidation areas is because all tools used sync when volatility is low after a big movement ( typical in consolidation areas ). But I cant have full control about when trades are opened. In that long range area ( capture ) maybe i have a few but not in all waves length inside SR area but Im sure I never will have one at middle of breakout movement.

Really my tools are simpler because I like simple things but I always try every one do his part very well. That is reason I'm very satisfied with my commented tool. Simple algorithm but very effective taking waves. Is not perfect yet but i have much room for improve it.

About how mix tools I used different TFs depending tool and behaviour I need but normally I use H1/H4...
Try don't lose pants never...
  • #131
  • Edited Mar 19, 2018 12:10pm Mar 18, 2018 12:46pm | Edited Mar 19, 2018 12:10pm
Quoting braintheboss
{quote} For me consolidation areas normally are short areas after a big movement ( as you commented typical of flags, etc ). But an auto system is simpler then only see 2 areas ( trend and flat/range/consolidation ). If I say I play in consolidation areas is because all tools used sync when volatility is low after a big movement ( typical in consolidation areas ). But I cant have full control about when trades are opened. In that long range area ( capture ) maybe i have a few but not in all waves length inside SR area but Im sure I never will have...
Good job Brooo....
just like me ,,, i'm trying this my NRP simple system without auto system... i transact 3 days with total trade: 186 from 2018.02.07 up to 2018.02.09 ... with good results. usually I limit 100 trade only to test manually.... enjooooy
Gross Profit:2 439.50Gross Loss:3.63Total Net Profit:2 435.87
Profit Factor:672.04Expected Payoff:13.10
Absolute Drawdown:0.00Maximal Drawdown:2.60 (0.05%)Relative Drawdown:0.05% (2.60)
Total Trades:186Short Positions (won %):86 (98.84%)Long Positions (won %):100 (99.00%)
Profit Trades (% of total):184 (98.92%)Loss trades (% of total):2 (1.08%)
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: usdchf-h1-instaforex-group (1).png Size: 52 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: DetailedStatement 6.gif Size: 6 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: usdchf-h1-instaforex-group.png Size: 46 KB
  • #132
  • Mar 18, 2018 5:15pm Mar 18, 2018 5:15pm
Quoting COmar.FX
{quote} Good job Brooo.... just like me ,,, i'm trying this my NRP simple system without auto system... i transact 3 days with total trade: 186 from 2018.02.07 up to 2018.02.09 ... with good results. usually I limit 100 trade only to test manually.... enjooooy Gross Profit:2 439.50Gross Loss:3.63Total Net Profit:2 435.87 Profit Factor:672.04Expected Payoff:13.10 Absolute Drawdown:0.00Maximal Drawdown:2.60 (0.05%)Relative Drawdown:0.05% (2.60) Total Trades:186Short Positions (won %):86 (98.84%)Long Positions (won %):100 (99.00%) Profit Trades (%...
Nice only 2 losses out of 186 trades using half trend BB and CCI.
Let it turn and find your entry.
  • #133
  • Mar 18, 2018 8:48pm Mar 18, 2018 8:48pm
Quoting COmar.FX
{quote} Good job Brooo.... just like me ,,, i'm trying this my NRP simple system without auto system... i transact 3 days with total trade: 186 from 2018.02.07 up to 2018.02.09 ... with good results. usually I limit 100 trade only to test manually.... enjooooy Gross Profit:2 439.50Gross Loss:3.63Total Net Profit:2 435.87 Profit Factor:672.04Expected Payoff:13.10 Absolute Drawdown:0.00Maximal Drawdown:2.60 (0.05%)Relative Drawdown:0.05% (2.60) Total Trades:186Short Positions (won %):86 (98.84%)Long Positions (won %):100 (99.00%) Profit Trades (%...
Can you please post the indicators you used. Thanks.
  • #134
  • Mar 18, 2018 9:11pm Mar 18, 2018 9:11pm
Quoting iwishtowin
Hi please any non-repaint indicators which are best for trading forex.
Ever tried price itself? Works wonders... especially after thousands of hours of screen time.
mind over matter
  • #135
  • Edited 11:42pm Mar 19, 2018 11:22pm | Edited 11:42pm
and now the entry for Buy ... and close in the middle of BB daily line
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: usdchf-m30-instaforex-group-3.png Size: 41 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: usdchf-m30-instaforex-group-5.png Size: 38 KB
  • #136
  • Mar 19, 2018 11:36pm Mar 19, 2018 11:36pm
Quoting FerruFx
{quote} Yes exactly ... It was a fractals until the price breaks it and makes it disappear ...
Ah, but here is where the need to define the fractal comes first; simply, do NOT call it a Fractal until the required number of candles are formed and Closed

You can't have it both ways, you can't call it a fractal before it closes and then accuse it of disappearing, doh

And that solves the problem of repainting, the indicator must be coded not to display any hint of fractal until the candle is Closed

This is fault of programming not of the fractal itself

It takes a lot for me to IGNORE you, but you can try.
  • #137
  • Mar 20, 2018 12:51am Mar 20, 2018 12:51am
Quoting Erebus
{quote} Ah, but here is where the need to define the fractal comes first; simply, do NOT call it a Fractal until the required number of candles are formed and Closed You can't have it both ways, you can't call it a fractal before it closes and then accuse it of disappearing, doh And that solves the problem of repainting, the indicator must be coded not to display any hint of fractal until the candle is Closed This is fault of programming not of the fractal itself
Agree

Anyway, the standard fractals indicator provided in all MT4 platforms is well called fractals, plot fractals before it is a fractals ... then remove it within that unfamous 2nd candle!
MT4/MT5 EAs/Indicators/Alerts coder
  • #138
  • Mar 20, 2018 2:01pm Mar 20, 2018 2:01pm
COmar.FX can you attached the indicator you posted the picture above for me.
thanks.
  • #139
  • Mar 21, 2018 9:37am Mar 21, 2018 9:37am
Quoting braintheboss
Im building my own auto system and how all auto systems never works as expected. In my case flat markets kill me but not for common problem having a lot of wrong entries. I use compression price ( consolidation zones ) for place entries. And this sometimes have a side effect in my system. But with new algorithm I get this: {image} And its when i solve my system problem because size between zones is enough big for can play to ping pong while market is in range. And last trade always will take the breakout direction as you can see in the last zigzag...
What’s the indicator that covering the candle by 2 sites? It looks like BB; I am really interested to know more.
  • #140
  • Mar 21, 2018 9:50am Mar 21, 2018 9:50am
Quoting LuizGuilher
{quote} What’s the indicator that covering the candle by 2 sites? It looks like BB; I am really interested to know more.
I think you are talking about dashed lines in zigzgag. Its zigzag high/lows
Try don't lose pants never...
3 traders viewing now