Disliked{quote} 1. usually. That is an observable truth. 2. is when. Most, not all. 3. That was individualistic. Can you read for context?Ignored
3
Peering down the algorithmic trading rabbit hole 11 replies
Badgers Bolt hole 39 replies
Different Charting software: Hole in charts? 0 replies
Pipbuilder's hole 2 replies
Black Hole Trading 0 replies
Disliked{quote} 1. usually. That is an observable truth. 2. is when. Most, not all. 3. That was individualistic. Can you read for context?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Waffle is what I'm reading. Stereotypes are a 'observable truths' when it suits you.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Observable truths and stereotypes are not remotely the same. Stereotypes are things like, ban muslims, Jews control the media, etc. Observable truths are behaviors people observe and hold those individuals to account.Ignored
DislikedBut often when people don't like information presented they go ad hominem and attempt to deflect. They start going after family members and whatnot. Now if you feel the need to be a White Knight, that is your prerogative, but at lest be competent about it.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Redefining words now? Stereotype: 'a widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing'. - "I am pretty sure you are quite secure. Conservatives usually are until they get some life experience" - yes that's a stereotype. - "One thing about wingers is when they do stupid, they go all out, and you have!" - that's a stereotype too. {quote} You managed to be a total hypocrite in the space of two sentences. Attempting to deflect by using an ad hominem ('White Knight') after first criticising...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Redefining words now? Stereotype: 'a widely held but fixed and oversimplified image or idea of a particular type of person or thing'. - "I am pretty sure you are quite secure. Conservatives usually are until they get some life experience" - yes that's a stereotype. - "One thing about wingers is when they do stupid, they go all out, and you have!" - that's a stereotype too. {quote} You managed to be a total hypocrite in the space of two sentences. Attempting to deflect by using an ad hominem ('White Knight') after first criticising...Ignored
So, I called you a white knight, and you called it an ad hom. You must need a dictionary also. I don't need to redefine words because I use them correctly. And you?
Disliked{quote} In the absence of cliffedwards, we have a new recipient of the Sanctimonious award.Ignored
DislikedHi Jen, since you opened this thread I think you can ban anyone who is trolling it by putting them on ignore.Ignored
Disliked{quote} She knows Alex. She banned Exodus. She is trying to show how tough she is. But I am under a deadline, so I will not be posting much longer at this thread. For whatever reason she just will not push that button and get rid of the last liberal on her thread!Ignored
Disliked{quote} I{quote} I will not be posting much longer at this thread. For whatever reason she just will not push that button and get rid of the last liberal on her thread!Ignored
Disliked{quote} I am pretty sure that you know nothing about sanctity. {quote} She knows Alex. She banned Exodus. She is trying to show how tough she is. But I am under a deadline, so I will not be posting much longer at this thread. For whatever reason she just will not push that button and get rid of the last liberal on her thread!Ignored
DislikedMy next libtard deterrent. Who needs to censor? Only libtards themselves. https://youtu.be/WfuZgAUBZ-4Ignored
Disliked{quote} Very Nice! So does this mean if I get one of these I will also be able to repel SJW's?Ignored
Disliked{quote} white knight noun noun: white knight; plural noun: white knights a person or thing that comes to someone's aid. a person or company making an acceptable counter-offer for a company facing a hostile takeover bid. "the company was sold off to a white knight to fend off a hostile raider So, I called you a white knight, and you called it an ad hom. You must need a dictionary also. I don't need to redefine words because I use them correctly. And you?Ignored
See a pattern there? Pretty pathetic backtracking, and as a guy who has been on this forum alone for over 5 years it would be impossible for you not to know the real meaning unless you are very stupid.
You are a hypocrite, and Jen is right, a sanctimonious twat too.
If you were anywhere near as smart as you think you are you would be very smart indeed.
DislikedHi Jen, since you opened this thread I think you can ban anyone who is trolling it by putting them on ignore.Ignored
Disliked{quote} Jen, get rid of jmn - some good modding in this thread has been sorely needed. I respect your willingness to keep debate going and not ban people for their opinions, that's to your credit, but there needs to be some control of disruptive posters too. Exodus imo should not have been banned, he was not in my view being sexist in my view, it was a misunderstanding, and he was one of the very best posters. This thread is worse without him. Appreciate it if you don't agree, but I think Ex should be back.Ignored