The Rabbit Hole | Page 562 | Forex Factory

Options

Go to
Permalinks
Print Thread

Similar Threads

Peering down the algorithmic trading rabbit hole 11 replies

Badgers Bolt hole 39 replies

Different Charting software: Hole in charts? 0 replies

Pipbuilder's hole 2 replies

Black Hole Trading 0 replies

Attachments: The Rabbit Hole
Exit Attachments

The Rabbit Hole

  • #11,221
  • Nov 5, 2017 1:17pm Nov 5, 2017 1:17pm
Quoting Johnramb0
{quote} Yes I didn't watch them all the way through because they are nonsense and made by people who desperately want their fantasy to be true and will go to great lengths to knock a square peg through a round hole. It sounds like you are one of them. You are massively invested in this, not sure why.. could be because you hate the system (can't blame you) but it's causing you to be intellectually dishonest in my opinion. here is where I got my info from. https://www.metabunk.org/soundly-proving-the-curvature-of-the-earth-at-lake-pontchartrain.t8939/...
You have no idea what I'm massively invested in and what I'm not; this is from the guy who said he's been looking at this stuff for last couple of years, I'd say you have some change deposited in this judging by that.
Happy for you that you can assess something without watching and you have great skills in being able to blanket assess the mental state of people because their opinions differ to that of yours, remind me what do you do professionally that qualifies to make such blanket assertions ? Or is it you just don't agree with what they have to say ? This trait sounds a lot like that of a libtard. As for your advice I have to laugh as you lot here are my colleagues , go ahead give me some distance and fight your war elsewhere RAMBO. You must have strange family and friends if they would distance themselves from you because of a few differing opinions.

C Ya off to smoke a joint and bark at the moon.
https://youtu.be/mRH-URpgZrM
Once You See, You Can't Unsee But You Will Get The Odd Poke In The Eye
  • #11,222
  • Nov 5, 2017 2:17pm Nov 5, 2017 2:17pm
Quoting Stu Effex
{quote} Yep gravity pretty weak but it bends vast oceans and keeps them stuck to a ball. It's the science that's telling you this not your own senses I reckon.
My eyesight is not that good, I can't see molecules, you're right. And I guess you wouldn't trust an electron microscope. If you needed a heart transplant, would you trust science?
  • #11,223
  • Nov 5, 2017 2:26pm Nov 5, 2017 2:26pm
Quoting jen101
{quote} My eyesight is not that good, I can't see molecules, you're right. And I guess you wouldn't trust an electron microscope. If you needed a heart transplant, would you trust science?
I love science lol

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLUMINLTNLE
In detegere possumus omnes mortui sunt
  • #11,224
  • Nov 5, 2017 4:40pm Nov 5, 2017 4:40pm
Quoting Gamod
{quote} I love science lol https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLUMINLTNLE
You old, crinkly luddites trust science enough to get in your cars and on a plane. All that technology is based on Newtonian mechanics - theories.
  • #11,225
  • Nov 6, 2017 2:16am Nov 6, 2017 2:16am
Quoting jen101
{quote} My eyesight is not that good, I can't see molecules, you're right. And I guess you wouldn't trust an electron microscope. If you needed a heart transplant, would you trust science?
You don't need to see molecules, you can look up and see a moisture laden cloud and wonder how does gravity let that suspend itself, while at the same time has this huge pull to the centre of the earth on the oceans. Anyway this route is well trodden I have my thoughts and you have yours.
If I needed a heart transplant first I look at the survival rates of actually making it off the table then 1 year, 5 year , 10 year etc if the odds are good, I'll take the bet. Again we've been down this route before..... I'll defo take my chance with cancer and refuse what they have to offer. Heart transplant surgery doesn't seem to have made it into the business league yet unlike cancer. Maybe if they start to harvest hearts and it becomes more business like, (like cancer) that would be time to re-evaluate.
As for actually trusting science , I say there is science and science. Much of it is almost tangible. As for gravity I think we were sold on VHS when Betamax did the same thing.
Once You See, You Can't Unsee But You Will Get The Odd Poke In The Eye
  • #11,226
  • Nov 6, 2017 3:09am Nov 6, 2017 3:09am
Quoting Stu Effex
{quote} You don't need to see molecules, you can look up and see a moisture laden cloud and wonder how does gravity let that suspend itself, while at the same time has this huge pull to the centre of the earth on the oceans. Anyway this route is well trodden I have my thoughts and you have yours. If I needed a heart transplant first I look at the survival rates of actually making it off the table then 1 year, 5 year , 10 year etc if the odds are good, I'll take the bet. Again we've been down this route before..... I'll defo take my chance with cancer...
I explained why water in its gaseous state overcame gravity. You told me I based that on science rather than seeing it with my own eyes. The reason is that the molecules are agitated enough to contain more energy to overcome the gravitational pull. Now you say I don't need to see it. Is that not accepting scientific explanations? You're being circuitous.

Anyhow why are you accepting that water contain molecules? What are molecules? What are in molecules? What are in atoms? What are the forces within an atom? The sub atomic particles? Is that not science you are accepting?
  • #11,227
  • Nov 6, 2017 4:06am Nov 6, 2017 4:06am
What I don't understand with gravity is why and where in space it stops working.

We are told that the puny little moon affects our oceans but at the same time 200 miles up in space there is NO gravitational pull from the earth.

Where do we become weightless at 199 mls or is it 100 mls - makes no sense to me.
In detegere possumus omnes mortui sunt
  • #11,228
  • Nov 6, 2017 4:10am Nov 6, 2017 4:10am
Still think EU is a democracy? More evidence of the common denominator.

The document lists 226 MEPs from all sides of political spectrum, including former President of the European Parliament Martin Schulz, former Belgian PM Guy Verhofstadt, seven vice-presidents, and a number of committee heads, coordinators, and quaestors. These people promote the ideas of Soros, such as bringing in more migrants, same-sex marriages, integration of Ukraine into the EU, and countering Russia (http://www.nybooks.com/articles/2014/11/20/wake-up-europe/). There are 751 members of the European Parliament. It means that the Soros friends have more than one third of seats.

The Visegrad group is trying to stand tall under the EU pressure on migrants’ policy. The European Commission of Migration and Home Affairs is pushing a new bill to make migrants quotas obligatory. At least 30 Soros supporters work for the commission.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-05/soros-myth-european-democracy-shocking-revelation
In detegere possumus omnes mortui sunt
  • #11,229
  • Nov 6, 2017 4:19am Nov 6, 2017 4:19am
Quoting jen101
{quote} I explained why water in its gaseous state overcame gravity. You told me I based that on science rather than seeing it with my own eyes. The reason is that the molecules are agitated enough to contain more energy to overcome the gravitational pull. Now you say I don't need to see it. Is that not accepting scientific explanations? You're being circuitous. Anyhow why are you accepting that water contain molecules? What are molecules? What are in molecules? What are in atoms? What are the forces within an atom? The sub atomic particles? Is...
Jen since I started talking about this stuff I have consistently made the point about trying to view and explain much of this stuff without resorting to what science tells us. When I said you don't need to see, I was of course talking about molecules which is why I said just look up at a moisture laden cloud because we can see it and making the point referring to your comment about weak gravity. Is it gravity that pulls the moisture out of the cloud ? Clearly it (gravity ) chooses to ignore it for a time whilst at the same time keeps huge oceans pinned to a ball, so I have issues at how selective gravity is.
Once You See, You Can't Unsee But You Will Get The Odd Poke In The Eye
  • #11,230
  • Nov 6, 2017 4:27am Nov 6, 2017 4:27am
I know we've done the flat earth to death - but no curvature visible at 400+ kms - Give me a break LOL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=727&v=TDEBNguWfcg
In detegere possumus omnes mortui sunt
  • #11,231
  • Nov 6, 2017 4:28am Nov 6, 2017 4:28am
Science poster boy Cox flies in a typhoon here. Is what they say they are doing going against what science tells us ?

04:30 to 11:00 approx should be enough.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4k8e89?GK_FACEBOOK_OG_HTML5=1
Once You See, You Can't Unsee But You Will Get The Odd Poke In The Eye
  • #11,232
  • Nov 6, 2017 4:30am Nov 6, 2017 4:30am
Quoting Gamod
What I don't understand with gravity is why and where in space it stops working. We are told that the puny little moon affects our oceans but at the same time 200 miles up in space there is NO gravitational pull from the earth. Where do we become weightless at 199 mls or is it 100 mls - makes no sense to me.
As previously discussed with you, at 200 miles up you are not free from gravity. There is actually no such thing as zero gravity. You are never free from gravity where ever you may be in space.
Adriaaaaan
  • #11,233
  • Nov 6, 2017 4:39am Nov 6, 2017 4:39am
Quoting Johnramb0
{quote} As previously discussed with you, at 200 miles up you are not free from gravity. There is actually no such thing as zero gravity. You are never free from gravity where ever you may be in space.
Haven't you just posted loadsa cartoons showing weightlessness on the ISS
In detegere possumus omnes mortui sunt
  • #11,234
  • Nov 6, 2017 4:42am Nov 6, 2017 4:42am
SA has been bombing the shit outta Yemen for years - They fire a rocket at Ryhad and it's an act of war ROFLMFAO.

https://sputniknews.com/middleeast/201711061058843616-saudi-consider-act-war-iran-houthis/
In detegere possumus omnes mortui sunt
  • #11,235
  • Nov 6, 2017 5:05am Nov 6, 2017 5:05am
Quoting Gamod
{quote} Haven't you just posted loadsa cartoons showing weightlessness on the ISS
It isn't really weightlessness although this is the term used to avoid unnecessary time wasted explaining why it isn't weightlessness to simple minds.
Adriaaaaan
  • #11,236
  • Nov 6, 2017 5:11am Nov 6, 2017 5:11am
Quoting JohThanks John, now Inramb0
{quote} It isn't really weightlessness although this is the term used to avoid unnecessary time wasted explaining why it isn't weightlessness to simple minds.
Thanks John, Now I understand why the ISS keeps crashing - if it was weightless it would just stay up there wouldn't it, sorta floating above the clouds..
In detegere possumus omnes mortui sunt
  • #11,237
  • Nov 6, 2017 7:00am Nov 6, 2017 7:00am
Quoting Stu Effex
Science poster boy Cox flies in a typhoon here. Is what they say they are doing going against what science tells us ? 04:30 to 11:00 approx should be enough. http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x4k8e89?GK_FACEBOOK_OG_HTML5=1
What bit do you feel goes against science?
Adriaaaaan
  • #11,238
  • Nov 6, 2017 7:58am Nov 6, 2017 7:58am
Up until a few years ago I believed fervently in the moon landings, then I started asking q's and the answers I got made no sense, but still for a long time I was undecided..

Now I have come off the fence - WE DID NOT GO TO THE MOON...PERIOD.
And I doubt there is an ISS either. Flat earth?? still not sure LOL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=14&v=GH6-BDVWCog


https://www.theburningplatform.com/2017/11/06/amazing-nasa-confession/#more-162928
In detegere possumus omnes mortui sunt
  • #11,239
  • Nov 6, 2017 8:16am Nov 6, 2017 8:16am
If you are interested in something then you should do a little hard work and research.


Saudi state-funded religious scholars, who generally follow the Hanbali school of Islamic jurisprudence, are variously described as “Wahhabi” after Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab or “Salafi.” Salafism refers to a movement within Sunni Islam that developed in Arabia in the first half of the 18th century and advocated a return to the traditions of the “devout ancestors” (the salaf). There is extensive academic and political debate over these terms and their usage, as well as their relationship to a spectrum of Sunni religio-political movements, including the Salafi-Jihadi ideologies that have fueled armed groups such as al Qaeda and the Islamic State or ISIS. This debate is beyond the scope of this report, but further reading on this topic can be found in the sources cited in the footnotes.

http://www.arabnews.com/node/1102196/saudi-arabia

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-yousaf-butt-/saudi-wahhabism-islam-terrorism_b_6501916.html

https://www.hrw.org/report/2017/09/26/they-are-not-our-brothers/hate-speech-saudi-officials






Quoting Gamod
The Visegrad group is trying to stand tall under the EU pressure on migrants’ policy. The European Commission of Migration and Home Affairs is pushing a new bill to make migrants quotas obligatory. At least 30 Soros supporters work for the commission. http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-11-05/soros-myth-european-democracy-shocking-revelation
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Visegrad.png Size: 462 KB
  • #11,240
  • Nov 6, 2017 8:49am Nov 6, 2017 8:49am
Quoting StrongOnStab
If you are interested in something then you should do a little hard work and research. Saudi state-funded religious scholars, who generally follow the Hanbali school of Islamic jurisprudence, are variously described as “Wahhabi” after Muhammad ibn Abd al-Wahhab or “Salafi.” Salafism refers to a movement within Sunni Islam that developed in Arabia in the first half of the 18th century and advocated a return to the traditions of the “devout ancestors” (the salaf). There is extensive academic and political debate over these terms and their usage, as...
Not sure what the point of this post was, but if you have done any serious research into the subject you, presumably, know that George was also heavily involved in BiH and that Wahabism is closely aligned with Zionism.

Sorry but I can't take anyone who quotes HRW and HuffPo(FFS) seriously.
In detegere possumus omnes mortui sunt
16 traders viewing now