Disliked{quote} Ok Verv if you referring to Charlettesville incident perhaps you should not have replied to my isolated comment. With respect we have numerous topics on the stocks at once. Well this is one place were there is a line for sure about mentioning Jews. MAG was booted in a former life too for being critical of Israel etc etc. Regardless the point I was making is if we say anything, there is a feeling of having to qualify everything due to a fear of labeling. Just as you did when you qualified with "Not scapegoating Jews". If it is your perceptions...Ignored
I said to Magogg numerous times that he needs to pay attention to the authenticity of the stuff he is posting. We are in an age of information warfare and there is not enough scrutiny of some of things posted on this website and especially in this thread (I'm guilty too). The enemies of liberty (and the West) are constantly exploiting the freedom of speech laws by producing information that is not accurate with a view to fracturing our politics and our society.
It is known that Russian and Chinese spread propaganda online (the West does it - no doubt) and people like Magogg, who are not doing their due dilligence have become unwitting vehicles for that disinformation. The Kremlin is considered to have been helping in the past both the 'far left' and the 'far right' and has been responsible for some of the now well known conspiracy theories, why they would do that should be obvious. The CIA published a pamphlet on how the conspiracy of AIDs started, how it spread, and why its likely origin was the Soviet KGB? That's an example of this disinformation, and how the rumor started, spread and gained traction.
I'm not saying all of it is disinformation, but I am saying that if you find a website criticising ONLY the USA or the EU, or the UK, and never the actions of Russia for example is a dead giveaway. As I said to Magogg, anyone can make any claim online or on youtube, historical scholarly work has peer review.