Broker which allow Arbitrage trading?

Hi Markus,

My VPS are 10GB/sec maybe not super fast, but it is enough for me.

Probably we can test some EAs and exchange.

If you click on the profile you can contact me via SKP, TW, etc.

Unfortunately, for simply understandable reasons I will not upload latest technologies to forums.

Best regards

Petra

Hello,
I am from Myanmar. Is there any broker who allow arbitrage ea ? I have automated arbitrage ea which is very profitable and it can run on live ( already tested ) but the broker denied my profits.

what broker did you use?
I can help you with that. Do you mind share your EA with me?

You should not say any ECN broker would be fine for Arbitrage trading, many of them won't even want to hear you mention it. Seems all retail brokers forbid it. Maybe it is because traders make too much money off it.

Probably traders should not try any arbitrage strategies since arbitrage condition means receiving profit with zero risk. Even if you don't try to exploit speed disadvantages related to broker platform, other types of arbitrage like swap arbitrage could be also flagged by a broker with respective action like widening spread or simply account termination.

Take into consideration that even if using proper STP broker in the end of the chain always sits some sort of a market maker in the form of a liquity provider. Now it is easy to imagine why for most of them arbitrage equals sacrilege

I can help in withdrawals. for more info text me privately.

Maybe, you should try FreshForex, other tons of brokers that could allow such ways of trading include FXCM and maybe Oanda. Just saying

Very risk to try Arbitrage. Have chance to loss deposit money.

Hi there,
Which EA is that?

"Forex arbitrage is dead" — they've been saying this since 2010. Here's what actually happened.
I've been building arbitrage software since 2000. Every single year since at least 2010, I see the same thread. Same arguments. Same conclusion: "arbitrage is dead, spreads are too tight, brokers detect everything, it's over."
The traders saying this are wrong. Not because arbitrage is easy — it isn't, not anymore — but because they're describing a version of arbitrage that stopped working in 2015 and calling it the whole story.
Let me be specific about what actually changed, and what didn't.
What died:
Simple two-broker latency arbitrage from a home PC with a retail trading terminal. No colocation, no fast feed, just two platform windows and a bot firing orders. This stopped being consistently profitable around 2016–2018, as brokers deployed execution-delay plugins. If this is what you tried and it didn't work — you're right, that version is gone.
What didn't die:
The underlying inefficiency. Price propagation between brokers is still imperfect. It always will be, because the forex market is structurally fragmented — there is no central exchange, hundreds of brokers quote independently, and liquidity providers update at different speeds. The gaps are smaller and shorter than in 2010. But they exist every single session.
What actually changed:
The barrier to entry went up. In 2010, latency arbitrage was accessible to anyone with $500 and an internet connection. In 2026, running it profitably requires:

1. VPS colocation at the broker's data center (LD4, NY4, or TY3) — not just "a VPS in London"
2. A proper fast feed, not a second retail broker account
3. Direct broker connection via FIX API or a reliable platform like cTrader or DXTrade
4. Masking strategies that make your order flow look like retail trading to broker AI systems

This isn't "arbitrage is dead." It's "arbitrage got professionalized." The people who complain it doesn't work anymore are usually the ones who didn't adapt the infrastructure.
On broker detection:
This is the real challenge in 2026. Brokers run behavioral AI that identifies arbitrage accounts through temporal correlation analysis, position lifetime distribution, and win-rate patterns on short holds. This is genuinely more sophisticated than anything that existed in 2018.
The response isn't to give up. It's masking: strategies that run technical indicator-based entries in parallel with arbitrage logic, creating an order history that looks like a retail technical trader rather than a latency arbitrageur. Does it add complexity? Yes. Does it work? The accounts running it are still active.
The pattern I've watched since 2010:
Every time a detection wave hits, and a batch of simple setups gets flagged, the forums fill with "arbitrage is dead" posts. Then the traders who adapt — better infrastructure, masking strategies, better broker selection — keep running. The traders who don't adapt quit and write the posts.
I'm not saying arbitrage is easy or that everyone should do it. The infrastructure investment is real. The learning curve is real. Realistic returns are 20–40% per month under good conditions — not the 500% in three days that some vendors promise, and not zero either.
But "dead"? In 2026, with proper colocation, a fast feed, masking strategies, and correct broker selection — no. Not dead. Just harder than it was, and therefore less crowded than it was.
For a detailed technical breakdown of what a 2026 latency arbitrage setup actually looks like — infrastructure, masking strategies, and realistic benchmarks: Latency Arbitrage: Complete Guide 2026

First time hearing of this maybe not from where i trade