Disliked{quote} Re Grenfell - I think all we have done is ask q's and point out the inconsistencies. For instance - atm there have only been 79 confirmed deaths. There were at least 500 ppl asleep in the flats at the time of the fire - did they all go walkabouts? Where are the survivors? I don't remember you calling BS on anything before - would appreciate if you could be more specific. You can't say many of the links posted here are bs unless you can back it up. Sounds to me like you dismiss everything as BS before even questioning it - try applying some...Ignored
I gave you an example of me reading your post about the warship and coming out of it thinking, 'that's a valid point'. There I was convinced that there might be something different between what actually happened, and the official explanation as I understand it.
The Grenfell tower fire, just because we don't know where each survivor is, doesn't mean they are dead. What's this massive relief effort about if there were only a few survivors, about buying flats and lodging people in the hotels? We have incomplete information on the survivors because most people care about the dead, we have an ongoing investigation on the exact numbers of those who have died, and people jumping to conclusions.
There is a difference between dismissing everything and asking to be convinced, not sure why you are implying I'm doing the former when I said I was actually doing the latter. You said I should try some critical thinking first, that's exactly what I'm doing, I'm being critical! How can you not see that. I need to be convinced.
True I should give more examples, but I have no desire to go back and wade through tons of shit just to explain why I said what I did. If I'm honest, I've long stopped clicking on the vast majority of your links for exact reason I mentioned.
