For me, trading is a simple job of predicting the future. Some methods are more reliable than others and we can learn through our own observations. There are some major grey areas nothing unlike astrology wherby anyone can claim competence and it is very difficult to disprove that. I know that when i was a younger man I craved to be respected and revered for a wealth of knowledge I didnt have, in fact I couldn't even piss straight in a bottle.
If i have learned one thing in life is that 'time served' quite often leads to competence, not always, but often. I Imagine also that Nut is the kind of chap who would give it to you 'straight'.
So in regards to Fibonacci, which I consider a dark art, I would rather have the straight to the point version not the mystic meg analysis. I dont mind a pointer to a book where I can find the information for myself. I could easily read a 300 page book.
I am afraid i cannot draw any hard conclusions from the first video as i do not have the confidence to make them, as for the second, it might come in useful if I meet my broker face to face.
I will wait patiently in my home made pyramid, Im in no rush.
If i have learned one thing in life is that 'time served' quite often leads to competence, not always, but often. I Imagine also that Nut is the kind of chap who would give it to you 'straight'.
So in regards to Fibonacci, which I consider a dark art, I would rather have the straight to the point version not the mystic meg analysis. I dont mind a pointer to a book where I can find the information for myself. I could easily read a 300 page book.
I am afraid i cannot draw any hard conclusions from the first video as i do not have the confidence to make them, as for the second, it might come in useful if I meet my broker face to face.
I will wait patiently in my home made pyramid, Im in no rush.