Disliked{quote} No. Your response is good. There is a troll on the thread bullying people. He'll come for you now because of your post. Ignore him.Ignored
At what lot size/account size do you have scale issues? 39 replies
Which would you prefer: increasing lot size or TP size? 21 replies
Reliable Broker with nano lot, micro lot broker, leverage 1:400, 1:500 35 replies
Lot size, contract size, max position ? 1 reply
BUY run profit 1 lot, SELL LIMIT 2 LOT down again n BUY 1 lot - EA Reqd 5 replies
Disliked{quote} No. Your response is good. There is a troll on the thread bullying people. He'll come for you now because of your post. Ignore him.Ignored
Disliked{quote} No, it's more of a philosophical argument. One side says if you can make money out of something then why would you sell it. The other side of the argument is if you could make even more money by selling it then why wouldn't you.Ignored
Disliked{quote} i think its scam, and if you are not affiliate all is fine, but its realy difficult to decide. i think we dont get to a new step in this topic. because managing accounts brings much more win, you can always think about why they dont do. you can cheat much more in selling signals, so much easier to present win, if done in pips its most easy ofcourse and same time wrong. is your old question (starting post) completly solved with the many solution here from many persons?Ignored
DislikedHi! It's a nice thread here. Thank you BigOldFella for starting it! What about Autochartist? Is it possible to achieve same results with it? SPIgnored
DislikedHow does almost EVERY post on this site become a fight over one thing or another? Doesn't matter the participants...same shit different thread. People either attack the OP or bring an ongoing feud into a new thread....over and over and over....Ignored
Disliked{quote} sorry to say that, but with this information the chance that you have 1 million left on your account in one year is much smaller then you have 100k on the end in 1 year. .Ignored
Disliked{quote} And why would that be the case? At 65% hit rate and TP=SL, the optimum risk level is 30%. When you say it's likely that BOF is going to loose, you're basing that on an assumption the hit rate is going to change drastically?Ignored
Disliked{quote} And why would that be the case? At 65% hit rate and TP=SL, the optimum risk level is 30%. When you say it's likely that BOF is going to loose, you're basing that on an assumption the hit rate is going to change drastically?Ignored
Disliked{quote} the problem is, the numbers the signale services show are not correct.Ignored
DislikedAfter successfully turning a small sum of money into a substantial amount I've hit the lot size limit for IC Markets. To keep on increasing my equity I need to be able to trade >1000 lots. Where do I go from here?Ignored
Disliked{quote} Spot on. The system automatically works out the risk based on the historical results. So it's settled down around 26.2%. I'm not sure if this is the right way to do it but it works out the success rate after the commission, swap and spread have been taken out. You're right though, if there were no expenses then 30% would be optimal. None of this 2% per trade shenanigans.Ignored
Disliked{quote} The probability of a system with a 65% win rate having a losing streak of 4 trades in a row is 51%! Based on 50 trades taken! Just saying.Ignored