Hi,
I too was puzzled initially. It took me a few minutes staring at the diagram to understand. You just need to try and follow the logic behind the numbers.
Split each trade into 3 lots (parts)
Stoploss 50pts
1 lot exit at +50
1 lot exit at +100
1 lot leave to run (looks like +150) from last row.
For next trade
From the previous trade take all your losing lots and multiply by 2
From the previous trade for each winning lot add 1.
Add up the lots
Make it divisible by 3 either by rounding up or down.
Thats the number of lots for the next trade.
You can see from the diagram you can see how the method sort of increases your lots when you lose and decrease your lots when you win.
Note the direction of each trade changes according to 'a' strategy so it isn't an average down kind of strategy.
Just my observations based strictly on the diagram.
You could change targets and stoploss to fit in with your particular strategy. I haven't tested it and it would take a bit of testing to see if there was any more benefit to this compared to a standard all in and all out strategy.
Best regards
Alan
Quoting Agent2005DislikedI watched the tutorial clip. Unfortunately, it doesn't explain WHAT multi-plexing is or how to do it.Ignored
Split each trade into 3 lots (parts)
Stoploss 50pts
1 lot exit at +50
1 lot exit at +100
1 lot leave to run (looks like +150) from last row.
For next trade
From the previous trade take all your losing lots and multiply by 2
From the previous trade for each winning lot add 1.
Add up the lots
Make it divisible by 3 either by rounding up or down.
Thats the number of lots for the next trade.
You can see from the diagram you can see how the method sort of increases your lots when you lose and decrease your lots when you win.
Note the direction of each trade changes according to 'a' strategy so it isn't an average down kind of strategy.
Just my observations based strictly on the diagram.
You could change targets and stoploss to fit in with your particular strategy. I haven't tested it and it would take a bit of testing to see if there was any more benefit to this compared to a standard all in and all out strategy.
Best regards
Alan