Lol course not. As in page one till now... Not that hard when you are on the road for a week...
But yeah we shall see if I can get it done
Oz
But yeah we shall see if I can get it done
Oz
VSA-divergence trading 187 replies
How to Blow $200 account using VSA--- 594 replies
VSA Journal 57 replies
VSA broker history change datas 11 replies
DislikedYes. Superlearning.
You really have to concentrate at 1 min chart, but it works.Ignored
Dislikedof course I hope you and tom are just joking about the 1 min , cause if you do not understand background you do not understand pros intent and background does not come form a 1 min chart....enough said
I have not traded any thing lower than a 15 min and have cleaned up every day this week and lastIgnored
Dislikedof course I hope you and tom are just joking about the 1 min , cause if you do not understand background you do not understand pros intent and background does not come form a 1 min chart....enough said
I have not traded any thing lower than a 15 min and have cleaned up every day this week and lastIgnored
DislikedJust learning 1min before. i use H1 & M15 in real life.
Many are talking about noise in lower timeframes, but every timeframe has noise.
If price moves from A to B in straight line, that is "no-noise", but we cannot see straight price lines in any timeframe.
Every system/strategy must work on every timeframe.Ignored
DislikedVery nice. R:R is very over rated concept. Assuming you can pinpoint your risk (a false assumption), you never know what your reward is until the trade is done. You can't, and luckily don't have to, predict how far the market will actually move.
VSA is good a telling you where your stop should be. It is market based an not based on the size of your account. Someone posted a good example of that earlier. The idea stop location was below the Shake Out-too far for many but the market doesn't care about that. The reward? Well that would depend on...Ignored
DislikedAren't trades so beautiful in retrospect?
Anyway, forbidden trading hours for me (first of all 'cause I'm sleeping, and second because I don't take trades before Europe's opening).
But trying to analyze it as if it was happening now, I think I wouldn't have entered there... that NS isn't convincing enough for me (should happen lower, as a test to the RUT's low body, to make me happy), and seems more like a ND (taking in account that, to the left of your chart, I see lower highs and lower lows being made);
Some bars later, seems like another...Ignored
DislikedTook the same, but later, after seeing no buying pressure around 1.3135.
But then I did something stupid... had a little "trading accident":
While I was flipping between windows on the computer, I accidentally double clicked or dragged (don't even know how, 'cause I only saw what happened when I came back to my live trading platform) on my "close_all" script, closing the short at 1.3124
I see now it is holding that area for now... but I wanted to watch yesterday's high area, where it already bounced today, around 1.3116.
Oh...Ignored
DislikedOh well... have to go out for a little hour anyway (little shopping and cigarettes)... I just hope it won't be like the last time I had to go out for 1h (when I closed a long with around 30 pips, and price went up 100 or 150 while I was gone!).Ignored
DislikedCan it be a failed test cause of the high volume? Or we need to see ne[t bar for confirmation?
Thanks!!!Ignored
DislikedI don't think that's a test, it doesn't even make a lower low. That's an effort to go up, now you have to see the result. But it's kind of dangerous shorting there, because there's stopping volume in that low.Ignored
DislikedAs I see it's not an effort. The range is not wide. I think it's just an up bar (maybe a test). As I heard from HG, test can be without making lower low.
If it is a test, we can see that it was a failed test with the next bar down on relativly high volume.Ignored