Menu
Sister Sites

Options

Bookmark Thread

First Page First Unread Last Page Last Post

Print Thread

Similar Threads

MT4 candle-by-candle manual backtesting 9 replies

Indicator for average candle size for up or down candle? 1 reply

How to make EA that send Open Price of Candle for every new candle 5 replies

Day's first H4 candle correlation to daily candle 14 replies

Correlation between first 4 hour candle and daily candle 1 reply

Attachments: Third candle bounce
Exit Attachments

Third candle bounce

I'm open to any idea regarding increase the profitability by adding new condition or changing the existing ones.

Note that i'm not a dev, just using CHAT GPT4o to code this
Quoting david79454
I'm open to any idea regarding increase the profitability by adding new condition or changing the existing ones. Note that i'm not a dev, just using CHAT GPT4o to code this
Can it code a mt5 version ?

Not that I cant do it manual, but would be nice with an alert for a faster scan
Quoting TranceGhost
{quote} Can it code a mt5 version ? Not that I cant do it manual, but would be nice with an alert for a faster scan
il sure it can, but mt5 is not working on my MacBook so I can’t test it…
no body posting trades.
the following happened today.
Attached Image(s) (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 7 KB
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 5 KB
ITB - Seeing Orderliness amongst 'Randomness'
Hi David,

I found some interesting data.

V3 - EOD YEs
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 11 KB

V3 -EOD NO
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 12 KB

V1 - default
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 9 KB


So i dont know why but V1 is by far most successful. Can you open on V1 ( the first ea you posted), input for the risk...by default its 3% if i am not mistaken. I would like to test it even more, and see why its working better then latest version.

Somebody mentioned MT5, which i dont use, the only advantage i could see is that we could test all the pairs at the same time and see how would dynamics work in case when the multiple trades are opened on a different pairs.


Today i had only 2 manual Trades, and deleted all the other pending orders since it was a madness on my regular job:
AUDCAD SL
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 11 KB
XAUUSD closed in profit
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 10 KB
Nice trading day, no hassle.
Help to be helped.
Quoting Lazar83
Hi David, I found some interesting data. V3 - EOD YEs {image} V3 -EOD NO {image} V1 - default {image} So i dont know why but V1 is by far most successful. Can you open on V1 ( the first ea you posted), input for the risk...by default its 3% if i am not mistaken. I would like to test it even more, and see why its working better then latest version. Somebody mentioned MT5, which i dont use, the only advantage i could see is that we could test all the pairs at the same time and see how would dynamics work in case when the multiple trades are opened...
Hi, can you explain me what you want me to do with the V1 ? i'm not sure to understand
That you add option to enter risk % in the version from this link post:
https://www.forexfactory.com/thread/...0#post14905010

As it is , i think now its 3% by default and it cannot be changed.
Help to be helped.
Quoting Lazar83
Hi David, I found some interesting data. V3 - EOD YEs {image} V3 -EOD NO {image} V1 - default {image} So i dont know why but V1 is by far most successful. Can you open on V1 ( the first ea you posted), input for the risk...by default its 3% if i am not mistaken. I would like to test it even more, and see why its working better then latest version. Somebody mentioned MT5, which i dont use, the only advantage i could see is that we could test all the pairs at the same time and see how would dynamics work in case when the multiple trades are opened...
V1 has more trades because it does not has the condition added on v2 & v3 (2 bearish/bullish in a row):

Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 9 KB
Quoting Inthebox
no body posting trades. the following happened today. {image} {image}
Hi Inthebox, I focus my analysis on bigger tf, where I pull the trigger on daily tf, so I go slow. I work 9 hours per day far from pc.
On evening time I scan the market and put an red flag for the pair near to the setup.
If you like I will post my analysis tomorrow. I found very interesting scenario.
Quoting david79454
{quote} Hi, can you explain me what you want me to do with the V1 ? i'm not sure to understand
Is there a specific reason you are filtering by this condition? I don't recall reading anywhere on this thread anyone mentioning this.
Attached Image
Quoting Lazar83
Hi David, I found some interesting data. V3 - EOD YEs {image} V3 -EOD NO {image} V1 - default {image} So i dont know why but V1 is by far most successful. Can you open on V1 ( the first ea you posted), input for the risk...by default its 3% if i am not mistaken. I would like to test it even more, and see why its working better then latest version. Somebody mentioned MT5, which i dont use, the only advantage i could see is that we could test all the pairs at the same time and see how would dynamics work in case when the multiple trades are opened...
Can you also test this on EUR USD 2020 01 01 till today. My result are not really good. Your one seems to be more promising but we are using same ea.

There is the updated version with risk pourcentage accessible in the parameter manually.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: Capture d’eÌcran 2024-06-21 aÌ€ 20.18.32.png Size: 11 KB
Attached File(s)
File Type: mq4 zeze original.mq4   16 KB | 96 downloads
these are my results for the period EUR USD 2020 01 01 till today, 50k deposit
ZEZE EA
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 8 KB


ZEZE Original
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 11 KB


Question, in Zeze original risk 0.03 mean 3% risk correct? So 0.5% risk would be 0.005?

I am testing on darwinex so i am not sure about the discrepancy between our results. I know that Sunday candle can mess results significantly.
Help to be helped.
Getting closer to dashboard. Look at the three candle code. I made it symbolic. It will take time to get it.

The idea behind is like rubber bands, doors and explosions.

Say a door has a spring that closes. You open a door a bit and then spring closes it. That's what we want when we trade the bounce: open the door and then have it close on us and kick us out with pockets full of money.

But if you push the door open too far, you run into a room and face another door. The house has three doors. If you run through three doors, the house explodes. Or, rubber band snaps.

Left is for Long. Right is for shoRt. We record long situation on the left, and short situation on the right. They are separated by bar "|".

We record second candle, or candle[1] close to "|" and first candle or candle[2] next, separated by "."

We'll have to put in dashboard to see if it makes it easy to train the eye.

We record what is right now and what third candle or candle[0] did to previous two candles.

If price is below a candle's low and didn't poke above it, then for short side it's "-", which means nothing happened. For long side it's "*", which means total disaster, explosion, rubber band snapped.

If price is below a candle's low but did poke above it, then for short side it's "]", the door was opened and then closed.
If price is above a candle's low, then for short side it's ">", the door is opened, rubber band is stretched.

We don't care whether candle is green or red. We count its levels for short side from bottom up. and we count from up to bottom for long side. The effective configuration will tell us the colors if we are interested.

We record what happened towards the bar "|". which means current events are near the bar, and past events are away from the bar. ]>>| means price is inside the body of candle[1], and it did poke below the body into the bottom wick. We know this because left of the bar is for the long side, and we count levels from top to bottom for longs.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 13 KB
1.02^200
Quoting d5400
Getting closer to dashboard. Look at the three candle code. I made it symbolic. It will take time to get it. The idea behind is like rubber bands, doors and explosions. Say a door has a spring that closes. You open a door a bit and then spring closes it. That's what we want when we trade the bounce: open the door and then have it close on us and kick us out with pockets full of money. But if you push the door open too far, you run into a room and face another door. The house has three doors. If you run through three doors, the house explodes. Or,...

how are we supposed to use this code in live trading ?
Quoting david79454
{quote} how are we supposed to use this code in live trading ?
It should help anticipate desired price movement. It will be in a table for multiple timeframes and multiple instruments.
1.02^200
Quoting d5400
{quote} It should help anticipate desired price movement. It will be in a table for multiple timeframes and multiple instruments.
can you give some examples ? I have to admit that I don’t really understand your post and all the logic.
Quoting david79454
{quote} can you give some examples ? I have to admit that I don’t really understand your post and all the logic.
I don't want to type out all codes for multiple timeframes. Examples will be easier to give with working dashboard. The logic is simple: there's no bias, only opportunity, that's why code gives three candle configuration from both perspectives: long and short. More is coming.
1.02^200
Looks familiar
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 8 KB
1.02^200
Quoting d5400
Looks familiar {image}
According to this, maybe we can try to add a new condition "candle n-1 must have been take the low of candle n-2"
i'm not profitable with this strategy. tested gold, D1-H4. period 2024-06, result -9 RR.
Attached Image (click to enlarge)
Click to Enlarge Name: screenshot.png Size: 72 KB
1 trader viewing now