On ignore list of scammers, deceivers and low IQ individuals. Exclusively

- Joined Feb 2015 | Status: Patience | 1,317 Posts
When you are successful perhaps give a thought to others ... Kiva dot org
Just 1 Trade Monthly but Accuracy 90%+ 59 replies
DAX - is it Possible to trade with 100% accuracy 94 replies
Accuracy vs. net profit 10 replies
historical data accuracy puzzlement. 1 reply
accuracy problems or stable market 0 replies
Disliked{quote} How dare you Merka? Holidays??? Bmir is currently teaching those 'lucky 100' (who signed the NDA) to trade with 100% accuracy. As a side note, when you sign an NDA you have to give all your personal details...Ignored
DislikedFor those members with common sense, we all know what is this all about. For the others, dont forget that the mother of stupidity is always pregnant.Ignored
Disliked{quote} How dare you Merka? Holidays??? Bmir is currently teaching those 'lucky 100' (who signed the NDA) to trade with 100% accuracy. As a side note, when you sign an NDA you have to give all your personal details...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Just asked a legit question because he is not active since July. I suggest you to calm down and relax. You sound too frustratedIgnored
Disliked{quote} Just asked a legit question because he is not active since July. I suggest you to calm down and relax. You sound too frustratedIgnored
Disliked{quote}Talk about team players, they come here and are critics of the OP and demand "challenge" people to come up with the rules, but first calling them low IQ or whatever names and then "demand" that others do all the work and "make it easy" for them or because no-one does, then they say they must be right ... WOW ... talk about arrogance ... with a capital A.Ignored
Disliked{quote} And they call themselves high IQ but are unable to work out what Digger1 is texting ...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Plus in all the time not one of them has come up with a plan to help others & win at FX ... just be critics of others ...Ignored
Disliked{quote} If you want help from others, suggestion, then try being polite and treat people with respect and ask nicely ... and someone may help you ...Ignored
Disliked{quote} I won't because I don't know how to help anyone with the attitude that you people display and believe me I have far better things to do with my time ... except for the 5 minutes it took to write this ... but then, it was enjoyable and satisfying ...Ignored
Disliked{quote} Thanks to the OP and others who positively contribute ...Ignored
Disliked{quote} its refreshing to see this post and it is so true , kindest regards to youIgnored
Disliked{quote}I haven't interacted with you but you chose to be rude.Ignored
Disliked{quote} I want it all, I want it all, I want it all and I WANT IT NOW!!!Ignored
Disliked{quote} I love it when people mention IQ. For example I am way above normal, perhaps even a genius..got tested 4 times at menza and got a score I can't even count...think it was over 70. Only a few people are as capable as I am, I read only 2-3% have IQ like me. Bring it!Ignored
Disliked{quote} Hi Merka, I was just being sarcastic, but not toward you. Rather it was pointed to the hoard of gullibles who believe this pile of crap and gave up their personal data for signing the NDA. I refer to them as 'lucky 100', but also in a sarcastic manner. I hope this clarifies the misunderstanding. Cheers, BIgnored
Disliked[Sigh] Here we go again... For PayItForward {quote} You'd better believe it. The first thing I want everyone to note is once again how my prediction was proved 100% accurate; i.e. PayItForward (and ALL B.Mir supporters) avoided answering my four questions from post 589. {quote} No, no. Don't try and change the history of the way things played out. Here is the proper chronology of events that you and anyone else can verify...Ignored
Disliked[Sigh] Here we go again... For PayItForward {quote} You'd better believe it. The first thing I want everyone to note is once again how my prediction was proved 100% accurate; i.e. PayItForward (and ALL B.Mir supporters) avoided answering my four questions from post 589. {quote} No, no. Don't try and change the history of the way things played out. Here is the proper chronology of events that you and anyone else can verify...Ignored
Disliked{quote} And you're a slimy, wilfully dishonest child whos mistakes getting the last word (sorry, emoji) with winning. Let me quote myself this time: {quote}Ignored
Disliked{quote} Clearly overworked the only synapse (with only one available Google might help you understand "synapse") ... the post was way too easy to get this sort of lengthy response ... absolutely hilarious ...Ignored
Disliked{quote}KNOW WHAT THE PHUCK IT IS THAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT, My friendIgnored
Disliked[Sigh] Here we go again... For PayItForward {quote} You'd better believe it. The first thing I want everyone to note is once again how my prediction was proved 100% accurate; i.e. PayItForward (and ALL B.Mir supporters) avoided answering my four questions from post 589. {quote} No, no. Don't try and change the history of the way things played out. Here is the proper chronology of events that you and anyone else can verify...Ignored
Disliked{quote} And you're a slimy, wilfully dishonest child whos mistakes getting the last word (sorry, emoji) with winning. Let me quote myself this time: {quote}Ignored
DislikedPayItForward {quote} You can spout 'absolutely hilarious' all you want and pretend that you have the moral and intellectual high ground. For serious minded people though, we all see through it. Once more, you notice how you cannot answer the direct questions put to you whereas I address everything that you dish out? Instead of using ad hominems in place of an argument then please go to post 589 and answer the 4 questions put there. Unlike B.Mir my ability to predict the...Ignored
Disliked{quote} if you wanna get my attention (which it seems you seek so badly), you need to do better. These retarded-style replies make me wonder...Ignored